Unit 1 Flashcards
Morality
the Content of right and wrong- how you behave
Ethics
the process of determining right and wrong- why you behave the way you do
Non-normative Approaches
Examine morality without concern for making judgments as to what is right and wrong
Descriptive ethics
a sociological discipline that attempts to describe the morals of specific cultures.
Metaethics
investigates the meaning of moral language and the justification of ethical theories
Emotivism
moral judgments are merely emotive opinion (e.g. Boo for abortion!).
Prescriptivism
moral judgments are analogous to a doctor’s prescription
Normative Approaches
make judgment as to what is right and wrong.
General normative ethics
concerned with ethical theory and the study of moral systems.
Aretaic/virtue ethics
focuses on the character of a good person and the virtues that enable one to live a good life.
Applied ethics
concerned with specific moral and social issues (e.g. abortion, war, homosexuality).
Deontological
based on principles in which actions or intentions are inherently right or wrong.
Teleological (consequentialism)
based on the perceived consequences of an action.
Utilitarianism
an action is right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
Ethical egoism
the right thing to do is whatever is in the person’s self-interest
Relativism
right and wrong are not absolute
Cultural relativism
what is right is determined soley by one’s culture (e.g. “when in Rome do as the Romans do”)
Moral Subjectivism
what is right is relative to personal preference ( e.g. Whatever is right for you is ok but don’t force your views on me)
The War of Extermination
Ultimate blessing through Israel does not preclude historical judgment through them
The War of Extermination 2
The Conquest was just judgment.
The War of Extermination 3
God’s promises of destruction often are conditional
The War of Extermination 4
God’s judgment was limited to one time and a small geographical area and in order to bring a Savior for all
The War of Extermination 5
Israel’s conquest was not complete obliteration and involved ANE war rhetoric
The War of Extermination 6
The Conquest was prototypical of the final judgment