Unit 10 Flashcards

(74 cards)

1
Q

Reasons for change

A

External-pestle
Internal-performance-good=expand, poor=retrench
leadership-may change organisational culture or structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Disruptive change+example

A

Forces firms to suddenly do things a different way, characterised by a shift in the underlying forces of an industry. e.g internet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lewin’s force field analysis cons (3)

A

Identifies and evaluates driving/restraining forces of change. Ranks in importance.

  • requires full participation to provide accurate info to be realistic
  • may not cause a consensus. May cause a divide between people who oppose/support
  • effectiveness depends on skill level of group who are doing it, there may be gaps in information etc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Drawbacks of change (4)

A

Cost
Time
Loss of focus-managers lose focus on core activities
Resistance (K&S)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Kotter & Schlesinger reasons for resistance (4)

A

Different assessments-understand reasons but disagree/have a better plan
Fear+misunderstanding-do not trust motives
Prefer things as they are-don’t like change
Self interest-worse off if change occurred..?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Kotter & Schlesinger overcoming resistance (6)

A
  1. Education+communication
  2. Participation+involvement
  3. Facilitation+support
  4. Negotiation+agreement
  5. Manipulation+co-optation
  6. Explicit/Implicit coercion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Manipulation+co-optation

A

Giving desirable role in change. For appearance, rather than contribution. Cheap and quick if other strategies are unsuitable/fail, but Unethical, can lose trust if seen as manipulator.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explicit/Implicit coercion

A

Forcing employees-by risk of job loss, transfer or derived promotion. Fast but hurts trust etc. Risky as people resent being forced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hofstede’s national culture (6 dimensions)

A
Power distance
Individualism v Collectivism
Masculinity v Femininity
Uncertainty Avoidance
Long term Orientation
Indulgence v Restraint
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Handy’s Organisational Culture (4)

A

Role-clearly delegated authority
Task-teams formed to solve tasks
People-people are superior
Power-centralised, fast d-m

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Power culture pros cons (1,2)

A

+Centralised (quicker, expertise, overview)

  • Struggle when growing to keep decisions making central (react slowly compared to comp)
  • Employees resistant, don’t have a say

Good in Greiners creativity phase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Role culture pros cons (1,3)

A

+Clearly delegated roles of authority.

  • Employees not involved and not used to doing things differently so resist
  • Slow communication as more levels
  • Silo mentality-don’t help other departments

Good in stable environment, or a country with high UAI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Person culture pros cons (1,1)

A

Objectives defined by personal ambitions.
+joint decisions, so employees are likely to be comfortable (no resist)
-decision making be hard to make due to self interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Task culture (2,3)

A

Focus on tasks in teams.
+respond well to objectives
+change is normal, as teams change (less resistance)
-conflict between teams for resource/budget
-confusing if too many products/projects
-training costs

Good for strategic drift as flexible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Value of change (5)

A
Maintain CA
Adapt to external environment
Grow and compete more effectively
Improve efficiency and productivity
Improve HR relations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Flexible organisations

A

Respond quickly to external changes. Workplace is flexible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Knowledge and information management (KIM) and benefit and example

A

Organising, storing, sharing info so everyone can benefit from its use.

Allows more flexibility as info more accessible, easily respond to change or make decisions

Staff share lessons learnt to avoid same problems in future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Ways to be more flexible (7)

A
Part time
Job sharing
Flexitime
Compressed hours
Annual hours
Telecommuting 
Zero hour contracts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Strategic drift

A

Strategy becomes less suited to environment making it no longer fit for purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Difficulties when strategic decision making (internal and external)

A

Pestle
Unforeseen circumstances
Competitors actions

Poor leadership
Poor allocation of resources
Resistance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Planned strategy vs Emergent strategy +example

A

Emergent strategy develops overtime

e.g viagra was intended to be for medical use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Pros cons of planned strategy (2,3)

A
Clear sense of direction
Easily communicated
Lacks flexibility
Costly+Long
Can be too detailed/unreasonable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Pros cons of emergent strategy (3,4)

A

+quick, cheap
+flexible, can respond to changes, use hunch, more creative and innovative (Avoid strategic drift)
+based on decisions of junior management, more up to date

  • can cause mistrust due to changes
  • unclear end goal (not motivating)
  • can be hard for large companies as needs coordination (better for flat structures)
  • ill prepared in terms of resources/time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Education + communication (K&S)

A

+shows need for change

  • requires good relationship
  • time and effort (short run?)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Participation and involvement (2,2)
+good when initiators don’t have all info +reduces resistance -can lead to poor solution if not managed well. -time consuming
26
Facilitation & support
Expensive time consuming
27
Negotiation & agreement
+simple | -expensive e.g wage rises
28
critical path analysis
Identify the most efficient way of completing a project
29
Why CPA is needed
Projects are complex, high risk and sig investment or have narrow deadlines needed to be met
30
Info required for CPA (3)
List of activities Duration Dependencies between activities
31
CPA calculates
``` Critical path (longest path of activities to complete project) EST and LFT that each activity can start and finish without slowing down the project Float activities and critical activities ```
32
Float time formula
LFT-EST-Duration
33
Uses of CPA (2)
Minimise project time e.g shorten critical path by allocating resources from float activities or outsource Prioritise tasks Use JIT-improve CF
34
Disadvantages of CPA (3)
Time consuming Estimates Doesn’t show if project is good, or the costs of project so needs to be used alongside other tools Obsession with critical path-shortcuts-quality issues
35
Organisational culture
The ways things are done, and expected to be done.
36
Strong culture and advantages
Strong-employees agree with values of company. +require less supervision +loyal (turnover low) +motivation
37
Weak culture
Employees are forced to comply with values of business.
38
Define strategy
Plan for achieving corporate objectives
39
Examples of strategic planning tools (5)
``` Market mapping Stakeholder mapping Pestle Swot STP PFF ```
40
What does implementing strategy require? (3)
Leadership Communication Organisational structure
41
Benefits of strategic planning
Clear direction, communicated easily Way of measuring performance Efficient use of resources More effective decision making
42
Drawbacks of strategic planning
Analysis may be inaccurate | Inflexible-employees may stick to plan as they think they have to
43
Corporate governance and why it’s needed
The system by which companies are directed and controlled. Needed due to the divorce of ownership and control
44
Responsibilities of directors in corporate governance
Set objectives Lead Manage risk (contingency plan) Report to shareholders
45
Contingency planning and 3 reaons for it
Preparing for unexpected events-reduce panic, reduce impact, protect brand
46
Evaluation of contingency planning
Expensive, so not worthwhile to prepare for every possible thing that can go wrong If not carried out, forced to make quick decisions. Needs strong leadership to react and limit damage caused Employees need to be trained to the contingency plan for it to work
47
Organic structure (3)
Informal Flexible More adapted to change (decentralised)
48
Mechanistic (3)
Formal+bureaucratic Centralised No perceived need to change, so greater resistance.
49
Power distance
Extent to which power and wealth is distributed and tolerated. High-accept hierachy without argument
50
Uncertainty avoidance
High-avoid risk taking to minimise uncertainty
51
Individualism v Collectivism
Extent to which people are expected to look after themselves rather than support each other. Personal achievements
52
Masculinity v Femininity
Masculine-highly competitive, focus on power and money Femininity-focus on caring and quality of life
53
Long term orientation
High-society looks to future and accepts new ideas | Low-follows tradition
54
Indulgence v Restraint
Indulgent-allow people to satisfy desires | Restraint-regulate desires
55
4 types of organisational structure to implement strategy effectively
Functional Product-based Regional Matrix
56
Functional organisational structures and how it's good, and cons (1,1)
Organises staff by department. +Each function works in area of expertise, so implementing strategy is easier. -Each department can have own culture and priorities, can be hard to co-ordinate strategy across departments, poor communication
57
Product-based structures and pros and cons (1,1)
Organises staff by product, ran like a separate business +good for implementing certain strategies for only one product -duplication of roles-more efficient to have just one (rationalise)
58
Regional structure and when it's used
Organise staff geographically, decentralised control to adapt locally to market demands Used following a market development strategy where busines is expanding geographically
59
Matrix structures
Organise staff by a combination of factors e.g project and function, so they will report to their function manager and project manager e.g Operations manager and project B manager.
60
Pros cons of matrix structure
+ensures staff pursue clearly defined objectives +encourages departments to build relationships -conflict between project and department managers on how strategy should be implemented
61
Restructuring
Changing organisational structure of business
62
Main reason for restructuring
Maximise efficiency of decision making, communication and division of tasks.
63
How would a business in a fast changing environment restructure?
Decentralise to give more power and flexibility
64
How would a business restructure in a recession/hardship
Centralise to make quick decisions
65
What structure should a business use to be flexible and adapt to change?
Organic-less formal, decentralised, can adapt well to change
66
Benefits of flexible working (3)
Cost-less fixed costs+recruitment and training Higher job satisfaction and moral for workers as can work flexibly Larger pool of applicants
67
Drawback of flexible working (4)
Hard to manage-poor communication and teamwork as work at different times Hard to manage change too Loss of capacity if key employees reduce hours Potentially less motivated from remote working e.g isolation, distraction at home
68
Strategic drift phases
Incremental change Strategic drift Flux Transformational change
69
Incremental change & Strategic drift phases
Step changes by managers to fit in with external change Rate of external change increases, managers continue step change but gap increases
70
Flux stage
Recognise issue, uncertain how to fix, competitive advantage lost, fallen behind trends
71
Transformational change
Either make a big change to keep up with external environment or face demise e.g Nokia, Kodak, Blockbusyer
72
Example of transformational change
Netflix was a DVD service, made a big change to streaming to fit external environment
73
How to avoid principle agent problem from corporate governance?
Financial incentives to align managers strategy to shareholders. e.g bonuses on share price or profits (Apple forced managers to hold shares for 5 years) Transparency of information (public financial statements)
74
Where is contingency planning used most
In unpredictable industries e.g travel, airlines e.g strikes, terrorist threats, oil price rises (volatile)