Unit 2 Orianizational Structure & Diversity Flashcards
(163 cards)
Leading Organizational Change
4 Steps
- Diagnosis: Why is change needed?
- Design: What sort of change is called for?
- Delivery: How can change best be implemented? Who will most likely be affected? What skills and support do leaders need as they manage the process?
- Evaluation: How can the impact of the change be assessed and measured?
Performance Gaps
Performance gaps arise from a difference between expected and actual performance.
Opportunity Gaps
Opportunity gaps are defined as potential future problems or missed value-creating opportunities the organization will face if it does not act today.
Scope of Change
Radical vs. Incremental
- Radical change is intended to affect nearly all of these aspects of the organization.
- Incremental change is intended to make small adjustments to the existing organizational systems, processes, and routines.
Origin of Change
Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up
- Leaders typically plan top-down change, with clear directives, goals, communication
plans, and assessment models. - Bottom-up change emerges from within the organization
Tactical Change
Change that is top-down and incremental.
Evolutionary Change
Change that is bottom-up and incremental.
Revolutionary Change
Change that is bottom-up and radical.
Transformational Change
Change that is top-down and radical.
Rollout of Change
Systemwide vs. Localized
- Systemwide changes are rolled out across multiple units or subunits simultaneously, it can require significant resources and coordination.
- Localized change is rolled out in a successive process. This approach involves implementing the change in specific units of the organization, one by one, until it reaches all areas,
Timing of Change
Fast vs. Slow
- A fast change effort is implemented quickly, with the goal of enacting it rapidly and then returning to the “new normal.”
- A slow change effort, on the other hand, is implemented over an extended period
or may go on indefinitely.
Implementation of Change
Steps and Sequencing
(8 Steps)
- *1 Establish a Sense of Urgency:** Identify and communicate performance or opportunity gaps.
- *2 Form a Powerful Guiding Coalition:** Assemble a group powerful enough to lead the change effort. Encourage the group to work as a team.
- *3 Create a Vision:** Create a vision powerful enough to help direct the change effort.
- *4 Communicate a Vision:** Use every vehicle possible to communicate the new vision.
- *5 Empower Others to Act on the Vision:** Get rid of obstacles by changing systems or structures that seriously undermine the vision.
- *6 Plan for and Create Short-term Wins:** Plan for visible performance improvements and recognize employees involved in the improvements.
- *7 Consolidate Improvements and Produce Still More Change:** Use increased credibility to change the systems, structures, and policies that don’t fit. Hire, promote, or develop employees who can implement the vision. Reinvigorate the process with new projects, themes, and change agents.
- *8 Institutionalize the New Approaches:** Articulate the connections between the new behaviors and corporate success. Develop the means to ensure leadership development and succession.
Assessment of Readiness to Change
- *• Discrepancy:** Do individuals in the organization believe that there is a significant gap between the current state of the organization and what it should be and that the change is needed?
- *• Appropriateness:** Do organization members believe that a specific change designed to address a discrepancy is the correct one for the situation?
- *• Efficacy:** Do members of the organization believe that they personally, and the organization as a whole, can successfully implement a change?
- *• Principal Support:** Do individuals in the organization believe that their leaders are committed to the change’s success and that it is not going to be another passing fad or “program of the month”?
Creating Buy-in and Acceptance
for Change
- Awareness: The first thing leaders must do is determine who should be aware of the change. For some groups, knowing that a change is underway may be enough. Stakeholder analysis—a process of identifying individuals or groups who are most likely to support or resist the proposed change—provides useful information about which groups require more or less attention.
-
Self-Concern: The second stage asks individuals to associate some self-concern
with the change. Leaders should help others understand how the change matters to them personally. - Mental Tryout: The third stage gives individuals an opportunity to imagine what the change might be like before it happens. This is a low-risk way of helping people experience what lies ahead without having to change their existing behaviors.
- Hands-on Trial: The fourth stage asks individuals to experience the change in a low-risk environment. Leaders can create pilots for people to experience the change for a short period of time, and without significant time or resource commitments.
- Acceptance: The fifth stage marks an individual’s acceptance of the change. The individual has weighed the costs and benefits and has decided to adopt the new practice, technology, or behavior. For some, however, this stage marks a decision to reject the change.
-
Champion: Finally, certain individuals who accept the change may ultimately
become champions of the idea for others. At this stage, individuals have not
only bought in, but are eager to communicate the benefits to others.
Abundance-Based Change
Leaders assume that employees will change if they can be inspired to aim for greater degrees of excellence in their work.
Appreciative Conversations
Intense, positively framed discussions that help people to develop common ground as they work together to cocreate a positive vision of an ideal future for their organization.
Appreciative Inquiry Model
A model specifically designed as an abundance-based, bottom-up, positive approach, broadly defined, can be any question-focused, participatory approach to change that creates an appreciative effective on people and organizations.
Boundary Conditions
Define the degree of discretion that is available to employees for self-directed action.
Bureaucratic Model
Max Weber’s model that states that organizations will find efficiencies when they divide the duties of labor, allow people to specialize, and create structure for coordinating their differentiated efforts within a hierarchy of responsibility.
Centralization
The concentration of control of an activity or organization under a single authority.
Change Agents
People in the organization who view themselves as agents who have discretion to act.
Change Management
The process of designing and implementing change.
Command-and-Control
The way in which people report to one another or connect to coordinate their efforts in accomplishing the work of the organization.
Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS)
A model that views organizations as constantly developing and adapting to their environment, much like a living organism. A CAS approach emphasizes the bottom-up, emergent approach to the design of change, relying on
the ability of people to self-manage and adapt to their local circumstances.