Unit 3 Flashcards
(45 cards)
identify and explain elements of the sociological thought of key founding figures
- IBN Khaldun > a non-european precursor to modern sociology
- Auguste Comte > the call for a positive science of society
- Emile durkheim > restoring social solidarity when society modernises
- Karl marx > class struggle drives social change
- Max weber > rationalisation characterises modern society
- Harriet Martineau > a pioneering woman sociologist
- Web du bois > race: the driving line of modern society
explain the contribution of key founding figures
- IBN Khaldun >
- Auguste Comte >
- Emile durkheim >
- Karl marx >
- Max weber >
- Harriet Martineau >
- Web du bois > race:
explain foundational views about sociology as a scientific and methodical way of generating reliable knowledge about human society
explain the notion of “canon” of the discipline
define canon
a general law, rule, principle, or criterion by which something is judged.
define canonical text
a text that is regarded as foundational and representative of the discipline of sociology.
define founding figures
define positivism
what was the motto of positivism movement?
order and progress
what did Comte believe about positivism orientation when combined with sociological knowledge about society would bring?
it will bring new understanding of ways to manage society, political changes, ending poverty and nurturing of a new moral order.
define rationalisation
define historical materialism
define Maqaddimah
a study of tribal culture, nomadic life and cities and the settled life associated with the latter (recent)
define Sabiyah
a force that is a premier determinant of the development of society.
> term is derived from a root word asab / asabiyah ( is about the nature of the group or “groupdom”), meaning “to bind”
Asabiyah
translated to mean solidarity
D: a spiritual-psychological state of people.
> it is also the precondition for the formation of material social organisation or state called “ isabah”
asabtun and isabtun
group ( Khaldun Ibn)
what did Comte write in relations to how humans have generated knowledge about the world?
he wrote about two laws:
1. the law of three stages > which is a kind of knowledge; it is about how humans have tried to make sense of the world.
* First stage: the theological state > which corresponds with the domination of kings (kept political order), warrior classes and priest (provided intellectual order).
* Second stage: metaphysical stage > corresponds with the dominant role of both religious leaders and lawyers. It is characterised by the abstract (talks about essences of phenomena and forces and, rather than the conscious intervention of god(s), nature is brought in as the important factor) method of philosophy.
*Third stage: humans’ intellectual evolution > the scientific or positive stage > it corresponds with the scientists and engineers playing a leading role in the society; it is where humans come to understand the world through scientific methods of observation.
- Encyclopaedic or epistemological law> where he argues that different science (mathematics, astronomy, physics, chemistry, biology and sociology) develops in an evolutionary manner.
how is the dominant intellectual system characterised?
by people relying on fictions about God(s) as a supreme force(s) causing events and giving some kind of directions to processes in the world.
what are the features of sociology?
it rests on the view that human society undergoes some form of evolutionary development and seeks to uncover the law which one social state succeeds another. (Comte)
define social facts
ways of acting, thinking and feeling and are external to the individual, they have a certain power over the individual, and they are coercive and exert a kind of control over the individual.
anomie definition (Emile Durkheim)
causing people to be uprooted, and feeling of normlessness.
define mechanical solidarity
define organic solidarity
what did Karl Marx and Frederich Engels call their unique approach to theorising?
the materialist concept of history
> the scope of the approach was about what is happening in the society, the social change forces which brought an end to the social orders of capitalist society, the organisation of large industrial enterprises, the loss of access to a means of living in rural areas and simultaneous large-scale urbanisation, and the reasons for tremendous gaps in the wealth owned and controlled by the bourgeoisie compared to the living conditions of the proletariat who lived off the wages they earned.