Unit 3 (aggression) Flashcards
(75 cards)
what is aggression
Behaviour intended to cause harm to others (physical or psychological)
what are the two types of aggression
1-REACTIVE HOSTILE AGGRESSION
2-CONTROLLED INSTRUMENTAL AGGRESSION
what is reactive hostile aggression
(Hot aggression) occurs when the person is in a heightened emotional state
what is cold instrumental aggression
(Cold aggression) Pursuing a goal and causing harm to other in order to achieve that goal
what is important when it comes to aggression
Success/outcome isn’t important but the intent is
What would a bio psychologist say about the cause of aggression
They would say it’s caused by having a different structured/functioning CNS/brain in comparison to someone who is less aggressive
why is aggression not localised
Because it is caused by several diff brain structures interacting with each other, not just one
what does the amygdala do
Allows us to recognise emotions like fear and anger in other people as well as interpreted info as a threat(fear) or provocation (anger)
what does the OFC do
exercises inhibitory control (stop and go)
what does the hypothalamus do
Activates specific aggressive behaviour
what does the hippocampus do
Recalls memory from previous experiences
what are the 5 things we should consider when choosing to accept or reject an explanation
1)is it supported/challenged by objective observations or empirical evidence
2)how many people agree (consensus/creditability)
3)are there any alternative explanations?
4)is it useful in solving practical explanations (application)
5)does it align with the other things we know
what was the aim of Raine Et Al’s 1997 study?
assess brain dysfunctions in brain areas associated with violence
describe the PPs used in the experiment
-82 people split into two groups;39 males and 2 females
-experimental group consisted of 41 criminals with convictions of murder or manslaughter and claimed to be NGRI
what are some conditions the experimental group had
-6 had schizophrenia
-23 suffered from brain damage/head injury
-3 were substance abusers
-2 had an effective disorder
-2 had epilepsy
-3 suffered with hyperactive/learning disability
-2 diagnosed with passive aggressive/paranoid personality disorder
how were the participants screened/controlled?
1)free from any medication 2 weeks prior to scan to reduce its effect on the brain
2)control and experimental group were matched based on age and gender
3)screened for general health
4)PPs excluded if they had a history of seizures ,head trauma or substance misuse
5)consent gained prior to PET scan
give a brief description of the procedure
1)PPs were given a continuous performance task (CPT) consisting of a sequence of blurred numbers to focus on
2)PPs started the CPT as a practical trial 10 mins before being injected with FDG
3)after 32 mins on the CPT, the PET scan was done to measure the metabolic rate in diff areas of brain to look at the activity
what was concluded from the experiment
supported the hypothesis that brain dysfunction in the NGRI group was found in areas that previously implicated violent behaviour
compared to the control group, the murderers showed;
1)lower activity in the PFC
2)lower activity in parietal areas
3)higher activity in occipital lobe
4)identical activity in temporal lobe
in the subcortical areas, the murderers showed;
1)lower activity in corpus collosum
2)asymmetrical activity in amygdala
3)asymmetrical activity in medial temporal lobe
4)higher activity in right of hypothalamus
what are some strengths of the experiment
1)large sample size
2)any affects of medication on brain activity removed
3)PET scans allow reliable comparison as used on all PPs
what are some weaknesses/limitations of the experiment
1)only represents a small n0 of severely violent offenders as those pleading NGRI=not representative
2)study focuses on a subgroup of violent offenders so findings cant be used to explain other types of violent behaviour/criminality
3)possible extraneous variables so can’t relate brain dysfunction directly to certain behaviours (could be biological or env)
GENERALISABILITY
RELIABILITY/REPLICABILITY