Unit 3: Chap. 2 Riemer's Flashcards

(25 cards)

1
Q

Cognitive definition

A

A type of definition which brings about an understanding of the meaning
of a word (2.3.1).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Collocation

A

Regular word combinations (11.3); the immediate context of words and
morphemes in which a word occurs (2.2.4)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Compound

A
Two or more lexemes conjoined into a single conventionalized semantic unit, such
as lunchbox (2.2.1).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Contextual modulation

A

The way in which the meaning of a lexeme varies slightly depending on
the other lexemes with which it co-occurs (2.2.4).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Definiendum (plural: definienda)

A
The object language word whose meaning is being or has
been defined (2.3.3)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Definiens (plural: definientia or definientes)

A

The metalanguage word(s) proposed as an

expression’s definition (2.3.3).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Definition by context

A

Defining a word by describing the context in which its referent typically
occurs (e.g. defining glass with ‘what you usually drink water out of’) (2.3.4).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Definition by genus and differentia (GD definition)

A
Defining a word by specifying the broader
class (the genus) to which the definiendum belongs, and then showing the distinguishing feature
of the definiendum (the differentia) which distinguishes it from the other members of this
broader class (2.3.5)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Definition by typical exemplar

A

Defining a word by specifying a typical example (e.g. specifying
‘robin’ for bird) (2.3.4).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Extensional definition

A

A definition which precisely identifies the denotation of the definiendum
(2.3.1).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Mental lexicon

A

The stock of words and associated meanings that are stored in long-term
memory (2.1.1).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Morpheme

A

: The minimal meaning-bearing unit (2.2.1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Nominal definition

A

A description of the meaning of a word. Cf. real definition (2.3.1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Phonological word:

A

A unit which bears only a single primary stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Phrasal verb

A

A combination, functioning as a single unit, of one ‘full’ verb and one or more
particles, often with an idiomatic meaning. Make up (‘invent’) is a phrasal verb (2.2.1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Real definition

A

A summation of the essence or inherent nature of a thing. Cf. nominal definition

17
Q

Reductive paraphrase

A

: Form of definition in which the meaning of an expression is exhaustively
described through paraphrase into a finite set of semantic primitives (2.5).

18
Q

Register

A

A particular style of language used for a certain social function or situation (2.4)

19
Q

Semantic primitives

A

Hypothesized fundamental units of meaning which cannot be broken
down into anything conceptually simpler (2.5)

20
Q

Semasiological approach to meaning (or word-based approach)

A

starts with a language’s
individual lexemes and tries to specify the meaning of each one. For example, it would start with
a list of verbs like “scare, frigthen, terrify, etc” and specify a slightly different meaning for each
one. It functions like a dictionary (ie. it’s a list of words and one accesses meanings through
words

21
Q

Onomasiological approach to meaning

A

starts with a particular meaning and list the various
forms available in the language for its expression. For example, it would start with a general
concept FRIGHTEN and list all of these verbs as its possible realizations. It functions like a thesaurus (ie. it’s a list of concepts giving access to the different words through which the
concept could be expressed).

22
Q

Compositionality

A

: lists the meanings of “cut, foot, grass, cake, etc” and sees the specific
meanings of the collocations “cut one’s foot, cut the grass, etc” as derived compositionally from
the meanings of the parts. This might work in one of two ways:
a. The general meaning hypothesis: one meaning is valid for everything. One definition has
to fit with all the words.
b. The multiple meaning hypothesis: there are as many definitions as words/collocations

23
Q

Non-compositionality

A

every single collocation has a different meaning.

24
Q

Definition by ostension

A

: by pointing out the objects which they denote. Related to the way in which
children acquire language.

25
Definition by synonymy
: by providing synonyms, in either the same language as the word being defined or in a different one.