Unit 4 Topic 3 - The Presidency Flashcards

1
Q

Explain the powers of the President

A

President’s powers are his tasks, functions or duties, laid out in Article II of the constitution, formal:
• Propose legislation to Congress
o The President proposes legislation in a number of ways – most obviously through the annual State of the Union Address, occurs every January and gives the President a chance to outline a legislative agenda
o But the President can propose legislation at any time, e.g. by calling a press conference or making an announcement at a public event, e.g. Obama:
 Healthcare reform
 Wall street regulation reform
 Credit card regulation reform
• Submit the annual budget to conference
o The budget is draw up for the President by the Office of Management and Budget, part of the Executive Office of the president
o The President then submits this to Congress, followed by a lengthy bargaining process between the two – especially if the two are controlled by different parties
o Sometimes ends in gridlock e.g. October 2013
• Sign legislation passed by Congress
o Once bills have passed a complicated process in Congress they land on the President’s desk, he has a number of options but will most likely sign the bill into law, will receive some credit for these
• Veto legislation passed by Congress
o Instead of signing bills into law the President can veto them
o The regular veto is a much used presidential weapon, even it threats can be an important bargaining tool
o Presidents have used around 1500 regular vetoes, of which Congress has overridden around 100, success rate of 93%, George W Bush’s success rate of 64% is the third lowest
o To veto a bill the President must:
 Veto the whole bill
 Return the bill to the hose which first considered it within 10 working days
 Included a veto message
o Congress may decide to:
 Do nothing – the bill will not be passed
 Attempt to override the president’s veto
o If Congress attempts an override it will require a 2/3 majority in both houses, exceedingly difficult, President’s wont veto bill if they know Congress will win, politically damaging
o Bush’s veto of the Child Health Insurance Bill 2007: House voted to override the veto but did not achieve the necessary majority, no need for a Senate vote
o Bush’s veto of the Food Conservation/Energy Bill in 2008 was successfully vetoed
o None of Obama’s 8 regular or 1 pocket vetoes have been overridden
o The pocket veto can be used after a session of Congress has adjourned, if Congress is out of session and the President does not sign a bill it is lost, Bush and Obama used 1
• Signing statements
o An accompanying document to a bill that the President has signed into law stating how a bill should be interpreted or implemented. Obama stated that he would not use signing statements when asked, but did in 2011 to soften welfare changes made by Congress. The ABA has argued that 56% of Obama’s signing statements raise constitutional issues. Can also be done on foreign policy e.g. Freedom of Ukraine Support Act 2014

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Are the Presidential powers still important?

A

• Yes:
o Overrides are rare, and allows President to veto all but the most bipartisan bills which due to greater polarisation are becoming rarer
o Threat is significant
o Obama is using them in his legacy areas of healthcare, gun control, and they can’t be prevented
• No:
o Far less common than they used to be e.g. FDR had 635 as other less damaging political tools to alter legislation
o President aware he can’t do it on all issues e.g. gun control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain the President’s role as chief executive

A

o Opening words of Article II are: ‘The Executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America’
o This makes the President in charge of running the Executive
o A huge job, much of the day to day running is delegated to those who run the principal departments and agencies of the federal government
o The President has the ability to control and direct the army e.g. Obama ordered the killing of Obama. However, there has a been fall in this power due to Congress:
o Constitution gives Congress power to declare war, but the President now asks Congress to ‘authorise’ military action e.g. Obama went to Congress for Syria strikes. Bush got round this by calling the wars in Iraq as peace keeping missions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain the President’s role of nominating federal judges

A

o President must fill up SCOTUS vacancies but also federal trial and appeal courts
o All judicial appointments are for life, the most important are to the SCOTUS, during his first term Obama appointed Sonia Sotomayor 2009 and Elena Kagan 2010
o Bush and Clinton only made two appointments during both their terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain the President’s role as commander in chief

A

o Particularly significant during wartime e.g. WW2, Cold War, Iraq War, Vietnam War, Gulf War etc.
o Arguably less important post-cold war era, but potentially important in times of crisis
o President is checked by Congress’ power of the purse’ as well as its power to declare war and conduct investigations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain the President’s role to negotiate treaties

A

o Presidential seal of office shows an eagle clutching a bundle of arrows in one claw, symbolising the commander-in-chief role, and an olive branch symbolising his peace making role
o Obama negotiated the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) with Russia in 2010 – a major nuclear arms control agreement
o Treaties must be ratified by the Senate by a two thirds majority, the 2010 START Treaty was ratified 71-26
o In 1999 the Senate rejected Clinton’s Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty 48-51

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain the President’s role to pardon felons

A

o Mostly used in uncontroversial cases, most notable use was President Ford’s 1974 pardon of former President Nixon
o Clinton caused controversy when issued 140 pardons on his final day in office in January 2001
o George W Bush used the power sparingly, issuing only 189 in 8 years, Obama issued just 22 in his first term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain the President’s role as chief diplomat and head of state

A

• Chief Diplomat
o With approval of Senate, President will makes treaties and lead on international treaties e.g. Obama negotiated the START treaty. E.g.2 Obama was important in negotiations with chemical weapons inspections in Syria with Russia.
• Head of state
o President must take role of ‘comforter-in-chief’ e.g. Obama in 2012 following Hurricane Sandy. He will also meet with other heads of states on official visits and perform a wide range of ceremonies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain executive orders

A

• Executive orders are instructions to the federal bureaucracy, giving guidance on how the president wishes legislation to be implemented
• The legislative body is not required to approve any executive order, nor can it overturn an order. The best it can do if it doesn’t like an executive order is to pass a law to cut funding for the order’s implementation e.g. Republican who heads the Justice subcommittee on the Appropriations Committee is is threatening to block President Obama’s executive order on guns by defunding the Department of Justice.
• Example of an executive order is in 2012 with Obama halting the deportation of hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children.
• Significance?
o It usurps the role of Congress as they are increasingly used to create new law not facilitate the implementation of existing law
o Executive orders can be nullified by congressional legislation or judicial intervention but both are uncommon
o Undermines the separation of powers as the President uses them when he fails to achieve a legislative objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the Vice President

A

• Enumerated powers
o Presiding officer of the Senate
o Votes in Senate at times of deadlock e.g. Cheney broke deadlock to cut federal spending by $40bn
o He is the first line to the presidency, necessary four times in US history
• Increasing powers of the vice president
o Launch pad. Vice presidency is a breeding ground for future presidents or presidential candidates e.g. Al Gore. Many distinguished politicians have battled to be vice president e.g. Biden
o New roles. Worked as legislative liason with Congress e.g. Biden. The vice president often becomes party worker, electioneer and fundraiser e.g. Biden played this role for Obama in 2010/12
o Spokesperson for administration. Has been the case for recent vice presidents e.g. Cheney spoke a great deal on foreign policy
• Case study: Joe Biden
o Served for 36 years in Senate and was described by Bai as the ‘unofficial ambassador to the Senate’. For example, important in negotiations in the debt ceiling crisis on 2011 and Obama put Biden in charge of proposal gun controls following Sandy Hook
o Described in a National Journal column as ‘maybe the most influential vice president ever’ due to the sheer number of issues he has influenced
o Strength is he plays the ‘skunk at the picnic’ - forces advisors to consider their arguments carefully.
• Factors affecting the role of the vice president:
o Relationship between president and vice president. If they share similar views as the President then they can be outspoken e.g. Biden described as attack dog. Lack of trust limits influence e.g. Biden heavily trusted (evidence above) and Cheney was friends with Bush’s father.
o Presidential ambitions. Gore wanted to run for presidency so limited controversial areas with which he would not want to be affiliated. Cheney did not so did not have to consider being associated with unpopular policies and take more active role
o Extent of expertise. See above about Biden and role as liaison to the Senator, which became a de facto role following Emmanuel’s exit
o Personality. Cheney happy to take ‘Bush’s flak’ and be depicted as the hardliner in the executive. Biden, however, is more of the ‘man of the people’ and ‘regular Joe’; his gaffes even helping him in this role. Complements the more ‘intellectual’ Obama

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain the federal bureaucracy

A

• The unelected, administrative part of the executive branch, made up of departments, agencies and commissions that carry out policy on a day-to-day basis. The word ‘bureaucracy’ has overtones of inefficiency and red tape.

• Structure. Can be split into three broad categories:
o Executive departments. There are 15, with heads of each department (‘secretary’), with these 15 heads making up the Cabinet. The State, Treasury and Justice are regarded as the top tier.
o Executive agencies. The difference is that heads are not part of the Cabinet, and are instead ‘directors’. Examples include EPA, NASA, FEC etc. They are independent of presidential control.
o Government corporations. These are essentially nationalised industries e.g. US Postal Service
o Independent regulatory commissions. They are administratively independent of all branches, and operate behind barriers created by Congress to shield them from presidential control.
• Functions
o Executing laws. Main reason why the federal bureaucracy has grown, as Congress is now legislating in more and more policy areas. Principle function that laws are carried out in their policy areas.
o Creating rules. Legislators only write broad principles of policy, bureaucrats are required to write specific rules.
o Adjudication. Settle disputes e.g. Labor Relations Board

• Problems of the federal bureaucracy
o Politicisation. At the upper level some posts are are appointed on the grounds of politics, especially those made by the president. At the middle level, there is a certain level of political appointment as a head of an agency may decide in advance whom they wish to recruit.
o Clientelism. Where agencies tend to serve the interests of those whom they are supposed to be overseeing e.g. federal agencies who penned regulations resisted tighter banking regulations
o Bureaucratic imperialism. Agencies seek to expand their powers, and grow out of control e.g. Iran-Contra affair involved the bureaucracy supplying arms to Iran and the National Security Agency using profits illegally to hell Contra rebels. Also, has led to ‘turf battles’ between agencies over who has jurisdiction over policy e.g. happen a lot following the creation of Department of Homeland Security
o Iron triangle. Relationship between special interest, congressional committee and relevant agency. Leads to policies being made and executed for mutual benefit of parties involved. Example is the military-industrial complex, between defence contractors, Armed Services Committee and the Defence Department which results in a large defence budget

• Constraints in power of federal bureaucracy
o Congress. Can establish, merge or shutdown departments e.g. substantial reorganisation in 2002 following creation of the Dpt. of Homeland Security. Also, Congress can use its appropriations power (‘power of the purse’) to finance various dpts and agencies, investigate committees (e.g. after Iran-Contra affair) and can pass laws to overrule agencies or narrow their jurisdiction
o President. 1) Bush introduced competitive outsourcing where federal employees would have to compete with private contractors (failed due to lack of competition and savings overstated). 2) The National Partnership for Reinventing Government to improve efficiency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define the Cabinet

A
  • The Cabinet is not mentioned in the Constitution, Richard Fenno – ‘institutionalised by usage alone’
  • The Cabinet is and advice giving group selected by the President to aid decision making, membership of which is determined by tradition and presidential discretion
  • By tradition, it is made up of the heads of the 15 departments, by presidential discretion others can be given ‘cabinet rank’ such as the US ambassador to the UN
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain Cabinet recruitment

A

• New President doesn’t have a shadow cabinet waiting to form the administration, members of cabinet cannot concurrently serve in Congress
• 1961-2013 fewer than 1 in 5 Cabinet officers had Congressional experience, however among Obama’s initial 15 heads of department in 2009 4 had previous experience in Congress, three were serving members and had to resign their seats
• Cabinet members will therefore likely come from diverse backgrounds likely to include:
o Congress members, either former members (e.g. former House member Ray Lahood as Secretary of Transportation in the first Obama cabinet) or those willing to resign their seats such as Senator John Kerry 2013
o State governors (e.g. Governor Janet Napolitano of Arizona as Secretary of Homeland Security in 2009)
o City mayors (e.g. Anthony Fox was Mayor of Charlotte, North Carolina, when he was appointed Obama’s Secretary of Transportation in 2013)
o Academics (e.g. Ernest Moniz, Obama’s second-term Secretary of Energy had been a professor of physics at MIT)
• Likely that Cabinet members will be policy specialists, e.g.:
o Timothy Geithner (treasury) – President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2003-2009
o Arne Duncan (Education) – CEO of Chicago Public Schools 2001-2009
o Shaun Donovan (Housing and Urban Development) – New York City Housing Commissioner, 2004-2009
• Presidents are likely to balance their Cabinet microcosmically, Clinton – Cabinet that ‘looked like America’, Obama included:
o A Lebanese American – Ray LaHood
o An African American – Eric Holder
o A Chines American – Steven Chu
o Two Japanese Americans – Eric Shinseki and Gary Locke
o Two Hispanics – Hilda Solis and Ken Salazar
• Obama’s first term cabinet the most ethnically diverse appointed
• All Cabinet appointments must be confirmed by a simple majority vote of the Senate, last time the Senate rejected an appointee was 1989 for John Tower, Bush’s nominee for Defence Secretary
• Cabinet making
o Geographic balance. Obama had cabinet members from California, Colorado and New York
o Balance by race. Ever since Nixon, cabinets have included ethnic minorities. For example, Obama’s first cabinet had 6 members from ethnic minorities.
o Gender balance. Obama’s second cabinet has 4 female members in the Cabinet, with Clinton formerly the Secretary of State. However, both females and ethnic minorities rarely head ‘upper-tier’ departments
o Age. The average age of the cabinet tend to reflect the age of the president. The average age of Obama’s first cabinet was 55, though the youngest was 47 under Kennedy (who was the youngest ever president)
o Ideological balance. President will want different ideological wings represented e.g. liberal and conservative Democrats. Some Presidents will even have other party members present e.g. Republican Senator Chuck Hagel was Secretary of Defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain what happens at Cabinet meetings

A

• Meetings of the President and full Cabinet receive bad press, many attendees describe them as boring and a waste of time, some Presidents have had very few
• Most Presidents hold Cabinet meetings only around once a month, Clinton managed only two to three a year whereas Carter and Reagan held 36 in their first year in office
• Number of meetings tends to decline as the administration wears on because:
o Some Cabinet functions are no longer applicable
o The President has increasing calls on his time, not least when he has to run for re-election, Carter managed only 6 in his final year
o Presidents become disillusioned with Cabinet officers, often believing them to be disloyal
• Nonetheless, meeting have some functions, they enable the President to:
o Engender team spirit – especially at the beginning of an administration
o Look collegial and consultative
o Give information to all Cabinet members
o Glean information from cabinet members – find out what is going on in each department
o Debate policies
o Present ‘big picture’ items such as the budget, tours, campaigns and initiatives
o Check up on legislation going through Congress in which he has an interest
o See Cabinet members whom he would not otherwise see
• For Cabinet members themselves, meetings serve:
o As get-to-know you sessions – especially at the beginning of an administration when a number of cabinet colleagues may be strangers
o To sort out inter-departmental disputes
o As a means of catching up with other members
o An opportunity to see the President – whom many would not otherwise see
o Gain prestige back at their department, with first hand news of what the President wants
• Frequency varies from president to president, with Obama and Bush scheduling them before or after notable political events e.g. State of the Union Address or mid-terms. The Cabinet met just 3 times in 2012 - a former deputy cabinet secretary said they were ‘completely marginalized’. Reasons?
o Hoarding power in the White House as internal communication is far more efficient
o Better control of external messaging to avoiding messy confirmation battles
o The engendering of team spirit ceases to be an important issue after the first year as the President has achieved his aim of welding his cabinet members into his team to move forward his agenda
o Obama can consult EXOP and the White House staff as they will also have political experience
o They have been described as a ‘waste of time’ as cabinet members are policy specialists and have little to contribute to discussions in other policy areas
• Examples of the cabinet being neglected : “Neither Chuck Hagel, then the secretary of defense, nor John Kerry was in the Oval Office when the president informed his team of his thinking.” in regards to action in Syria. Indeed, the Constitution grants the president ‘all executive power’ anyhow!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain the relations of Cabinet with exop

A

• Cabinet members are not principally presidential advisers, because:
o They have huge departments to run
o They are not based in the White House
o They have loyalties other than those to the President
• Last reason often leads to accusations of disloyalty from EXOP ‘the President’s men’, which includes the white house staff
• While members of EXOP serve only the President, Cabinet members must bear in mind the wishes of Congress (whose votes decide their departmental budgets) and their own departmental bureaucracy, as well as interest groups with links to their department
• Unlike Cabinet, EXOP members enjoy close proximity to the President
• Richard Neustadt – ‘(an incoming President) must prepare the Cabinet members against the shocking discovery that most of them are not principal advisors to the President, are not going to be, and never will be, not since the White House staff has come into mature existence’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Is the Cabinet important or unimportant?

A

• Individually, Cabinet members are very important, though some more than others
• They run huge executive departments and spend vast budgets, but collectively, the Cabinet can never be that important, six main reasons:
o Article II states ‘all executive power shall be vested in a President’
o No doctrine of collective responsibility
o President is not the ‘first among equals’ – he is just first. Professor Anthony King – ‘He doesn’t sum up at the end of the meeting he is the meeting
o Cabinet officers are not his political rivals, they are not about to become President
o They have a problem of divided loyalty as well as a lack of proximity and access to the President
o The President has EXOP which is important in helping him and advising him to achieve his goals
• Nature of the Cabinet – a body with no constitutional standing, members with no independent political base of their own and no requirement that the President seeks or follows their advice – helps contribute to its lack of influence as a collective body – Professor Michael Genovese
• Embodying presidential platform. E.g. Bush’s campaign theme of compassionate conservatism reflected his cabinet
• Being ‘in touch’. Having a representative cabinet is now important and focused on by the media e.g. Obama initially had 7 women in the first cabinet and was the most ethnically diverse
• Budgets. Cabinet members are in charge of huge departmental budgets including Health and Defense

17
Q

Define EXOP

A

• EXOP is an umbrella term for an organisation that consist of top presidential staff agencies that provide help, advice, coordination and administrative support for the president
• Created 1939, after the Brownlow Committee reported ‘the President needs help’, EXOP now includes around a dozen offices, most importantly the White House Office and National Security Council
• Main reason 20th century President needed help was the huge increase in the size and scale of the federal government caused by 19th century westward expansion and industrialisation, and subsidiary:
o Roosevelt’s New Deal programme to help cure the effects of depression
o USA’s new found role as a world power

18
Q

Explain the white house office

A

• The White House Office includes the President’s most trusted and closest aides and advisors e.g. Press Secretary, Chief of Staff and Assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs
• Principal function is to provide advice and administrative support for the President on a daily basis, this will involve:
o Policy advice
o Personnel management
o Crisis management
o Liaison with the federal bureaucracy
o Liaison with Congress
o Running the White House
o Deciding and executing the President’s daily schedule
o Acting as ‘lighting conductors’ for the President
o Ensuring an orderly decision making process for the President
• Members of the white house staff are mean not to tact as policy makers but honest brokers, not meant to always be in the media spotlight but to have a passion for anonymity
• Chief of Staff Dick Cheney stated of his relationship with President Ford: ‘He takes the credit, I take the blame’
• The role of White House Chief of Staff is most critical, some e.g. Mack McLarty 1993-94 have been overwhelmed by the job, possibly because of a lack of Washington experience
• Others e.g. John Sununu 1989-92 became too obtrusive and wanted to become some kind of deputy president
• The best model of the honest broker, salesman and javelin catcher for the President, played well by Leon Panetta – Clinton, and Andrew Card – GW Bush

19
Q

Explain the national security council

A

• Created in 1947 the NSC was established to help the President coordinate foreign and defence policy, headed by the National Security Advisor (NSA) the NSC began as an in house think tank for the President, NSC would gather information, advice and policy options from groups such as:
o The state department
o The Defence Department (Pentagon)
o CIA
o Relevant Congressional Committees (e.g. the Senate Foreign Relations Committee)
o The joint Chiefs of Staff
• The NSC would then act as an honest broker and policy coordinator to present carefully argued opinions read for presidential decision making
• Nixon increased the role of the NSA when he appointed Henry Kissinger to the post, Kissinger became a roving foreign policy maker for the president, largely cutting out the state department and other agencies, becoming a policy play rather than mere facilitator
• This enhanced NSA role caused problems for Carter (over the Iranian hostage crisis) and Reagan (over the Iran-Contra affair)
• Subsequent NSAs such as Brent Scowcroft (HW Bush), Sandy Berger (Clinton) and Condoleezza Rice (W Bush) have reverted to the more traditional role

20
Q

Assess the significance of EXOP

A

• Significant:
o Political allies. EXOP members do not have divided loyalties between the President and Congress, whereas cabinet members do e.g. Charles Dawes remarked some cabinet members are ‘a president’s natural enemies’. For example, Sebelius fell out with Obama for her poor reception of Obamacare. Also they’re not scrutinised as much so have free reign, and can be quite autonomous e.g. Chief of Staff
o Appointment. The president is free to appoint who he wants as they do not need Senate confirmation. Means president can appoint those who he trusts e.g. Obama discussed military intervention with Chief of Staff McDonough
o Closeness. They see the President everyday, giving them greater importance in day to day dealings. Clinton’s cabinet didn’t meet more than 3 times in a year, suggesting a reliance on EXOP. E.g. 2 Nancy -Ann deParle was critical in formulating Obamacare compared to Sibelius
• Limited significance
o Closeness. EXOP members are far closer to the president than the cabinet and may develop into ‘yes men’ e.g. McDonough was accused of this by political commentators. President runs the risk of being surrounded by political sympathisers
o Advisors. They can only recommend e.g. Obama ignored advice of of the National Security Council when he deposed Mubarak to be ‘on the right side of history’
o Depends on president. Some parts of EXOP can be marginalised e.g. Obama missed over half of his daily Presidential Daily Briefs with the National Security Council, compared to none by Bush. Moreover, the president can easily dismiss members e.g. Emanuel lost position as Chief of Staff due to ideological clashes with Obama

21
Q

Explain the checks by Congress on the President

A

Checks by Congress
• Almost every presidential power is checked by Congress, thus the President needs Congressional agreement
• But in a system of ‘separated institutions sharing powers’ (Neustadt), this is difficult, and party links worsen this, the President and the majority of Congress may be of different parties e.g. 2007-2009, 2010 Democrats lost the House then 2014 the Senate under Obama
• Even when the two branches are controlled by the same party this does not guarantee action – difficulties of Clinton in his failed attempt to pass healthcare reform 1993-94, Neustadt – ‘what the Constitutions separates, the political parties do not combine’
• The President needs Congress, without it he can do little or nothing, SE Finer – President and Congress are ‘two halves of a bank note’, Maddison – ‘ambition must counteract ambition’
Powers of the President: Checks by Congress
Propose Legislation- Amend/block legislation
Submit the annual budget- Amend/block budget
Veto legislation- Override veto
Nominate executive officials (e.g. Cabinet)- Senate’s power of confirmation
Nominate federal judges- Senate’s power of confirmation
Negotiate Treaties- Senate’s power of ratification
Commander in Chief- Declare war/power of the purse
Chief Executive- Powers of investigation/impeachment/trial/removal

• Thus president’s cannot rely on formal powers alone; Neustadt – ‘President’s power is to persuade’

22
Q

Explain the methods of presidential persuasion

A

• Persuasion through people
o The Vice President: as presiding officer of the Senate, the VP has a foothold in Congress (all the last 6 VPs have been ex Congressmen)
o Office of Legislative Affairs: part of the White House Office and those who work here act as full time lobbyists for the President in Congress
o Cabinet Officers: Work in their own policy related area
o Party Leaders in Congress: Leaders, whips, committee chairs and ranking minority members
• Persuasion through perks; president may:
o Make phone calls to selected Congressmen
o Offer help with legislation that benefits members’ constituents
o Offer help with federal executive/judicial appointments of interest to constituents
o Invite member to a meeting at the White House
o Go to Capitol Hill to address a selected group of members
o Offer to campaign for members of his own party
• If all else fails the President can go on national television to appeal directly to the people, Johnson – ‘putting Congress’s feet to the fire’

23
Q

Explain the results of Presidential persuasion

A

• David Mervin described the President’s relationship with Congress as ‘bargainer in chief’, the President will always hope his legislation is passed, his appointments confirmed and his treaties ratified
• President’s success rate is measure by the Presidential support score, an annual statistic measuring how often the President won in roll call votes in the House and Senate in which he took a clear position
• 2009 Obama scored 96.7% - the highest on record, 2007 Bush’s score was just 38%, but:
o The score does not measure the importance of votes
o Presidents can avoid low scores simply by not taking positions on votes they expect to lose
o Score does not count bills which fail even to come to a vote on the floor of the House (e.g. Clinton’s healthcare reform bill never came to a vote in either house in1994 thus did not feature in his 86% score)

24
Q

Explain the partisan presidency

A

Relations with Congress
• With political parties becoming more ideologically homogenous and Congress more partisan, the President has a much more difficult job getting his way, compromise is more difficult; gridlock more likely
• Modern day President may get more united support from his own party than President’s two decades ago, but he faces far more united opposition
• His opportunities for using persuasive powers are therefore reduced, days of cross-arty deals and bipartisan deal are gone
Voting at Elections
• Decades ago Presidents tended to be elected not only with sizeable majorities from their own party, but with a decent proportion from the other part
• In 1980 Reagan was elected with the votes of not only 86% Republicans, but of 26% Democrats
• Nowadays Presidents are elected almost exclusively by their own party’s votes, thus in 2012 Obama was re-elected with the votes of 92% Democrats but only 6% Republicans
Presidential Approval Ratings
• Mostly the same between elections, modern day Presidents receive almost unanimous support in the polls from their own party identifiers and vice versa
• The gap between the President’s approval rating among opposition supporters has widened significantly, in 2012 86% Democrats approved of Obama’s job as President, only 10% for Republicans, the 76 percentage point gap the joint highest on record
The White House Staff
• Traditionally those who worked in senior advice giving and facilitating role within the White House were known for their policy competence, neutrality and anonymity, but no longer
• Today’s senior white house staffers are more partisan, James Carville – Clinton, Karl Rove – W Bush and Rahm Emanuel – Obama, publicity seeking, ideological salesmen, not neutral behind the scenes advisers
What are the effects of the partisan presidency?
• Aided and abetted by a much more partisan ‘new media’ typified by ideologically driven cable news television channels, websites, blogs and talk radio shows, the political atmosphere in which the President must operate has changed significantly recently
• Makes policy making and legislating much more difficult because it is harder to build cross party consensus in an era when politics is so sharply divided

25
Q

Explain the constitutionality of the president’s foreign policy powers

A
Constitutionally
•	The Constitution is ambiguous as to who controls foreign policy, dividing it between the President and Congress
•	President
o	Acts as commander in chief
o	Negotiates treaties
o	Appoints ambassadors, secretaries of state and homeland security, chairman of the joint staffs, director of the CIA etc.
•	Congress
o	Declares war
o	Controls the purse
o	Ratifies treaties (Senate)
o	Confirms appointments (Senate)
26
Q

Explain the extra constitution powers of the President

A
  • President has gained two powers not mentioned in the Constitution
  • He can negotiate executive and sign executive agreements with foreign powers, these are similar to treaties but do not require Senate ratification
  • President can also set the tone of foreign policy through major speeches, such as his inaugural or State of the Union Addresses
  • Presidents such as Truman or W Bush give their name to a new doctrine of foreign policy
  • Congress through its power of oversight, has also developed an extra-constitutional role in foreign policy – calling the President and his officials to account
27
Q

Explain the balance between President and Congress

A
  • Foreign policy control is pendulum like, generally, the President is in charge of crisis foreign policy making, while Congress has more influence determining long term strategy, but at time the President appears very much in control, it is to the President not Congress that all major foreign policy players report on a regular basis
  • He, not Congressional leaders get the Daily Briefing each morning on the current state of world trouble-spots, and in times of crisis the President has the facts, perhaps led to the suggestion of the ‘Imperial Presidency’
28
Q

Explain the term ‘Imperial Presidency’

A

• A term popularised in 1973 by Arthur Schlesinger’s book, refers to the misuse and abuse of power and high handedness in dealing with Congress, but there is debate, administration of Johnson and Nixon 1963-74:
o Increased use of war making powers
o Excessive secrecy
o High handedness in dealing with Congress
o Illegal activity
o Failure of traditional checks and balances
• But others have argued against it:
o Johnson was forced to decide not to stand for re-election in 1968
o Nixon was forced to resign in 1974
o As Ford – who followed Nixon – pointed out, ‘Our Constitution works’ including its checks and balances
o By the late 1970s there was much talk of an ‘imperilled presidency’ that was weak and ineffective
• Congress reacted to the imperial presidency claims by passing laws to check presidential powers, e.g. the War Powers Act 1973 which was meant to limit the President’s war making power, but much of this legislation has proved somewhat ineffective

29
Q

Explain the factors that limit Presidential power

A
  1. Public Opinion
    a. Clinton’s premiership highlighted the importance of public opinion, he survived his many scandals mainly because his public opinion ratings remained high, conversely to Nixon
  2. Pressure Groups
    a. PGs can mobilise public opinion for or against the President and his policies
  3. The Media
    a. Modern Presidents operate when media can profoundly limit what they do – media coverage of the President as a person is critical
  4. The Federal Bureaucracy
    a. The President is one person in an executive branch of 15 executive departments and around 60 other federal government agencies, boards and commissions employing around 3 million civil servants
    b. Mobilising the federal bureaucracy can thus be challenging
  5. Federalism
    a. Many federal government programmes have to be implemented by state and local governments across the entire USA
30
Q

Explain the factors that enhance Presidential power

A
  1. Size of the mandate at the last election
    a. In 2012 Obama was re-elected with just 51% of the popular vote and 332 o 206 EC votes
    b. Reagan won 59% in 1984 with 525-13 EC, and 49 of the 50 states, he thus had a much stronger mandate to govern his second term than Obama
  2. First rather than Second term
    a. Presidents find it easier to govern in their second term, since the passage of the 22nd second terms Presidents are seen as lame ducks and lose much of their political clout
  3. Previous Washington Experience
    a. A President with a good deal of Washington experience finds it easier to get things done because they understand how Washington works and the people with whom he deals
    b. Presidents such as Johnson and HW Bush have an advantage over Carter and W Bush
  4. Oratorical Skills
    a. There is more to Presidency than speeches and TV appearances – being a good speaker or performer is advantageous, gave Clinton and Reagan the advantage over the likes of Carter or the Bushes
  5. Competent Senior White House Staff
    a. Being a good people selector, especially for key Whitehouse positions can prove critical
    b. Clinton chose poorly and suffered, Obama has proven to be a much shrewder judge of character
  6. Crises
    a. A crisis can in fact help a President, providing it is well handled, people tend to rally round the flag and the President in these times
    b. Transformation of the George W Bush Presidency following 9/11, conversely his presidency fell apart following his handling of Hurricane Katrina 2005
31
Q

Explain the weak at home, strong abroad theory of Presidential power

A

Theory put forward by Wildavsky that states the US has one president for domestic affairs and the one other is concerned with defense and foreign policy. There is greater success in controlling the nation’s foreign policy than in dominating domestic policy
• Evidence for
o Weak at home: Partisanship. This has made it increasingly difficult to get programmes passed, especially in the case Obama’s ‘legacy’ areas. For example, climate change was a major campaign theme but the Waxman-Markey bill was abandoned in the Senate, Harry Reid conceded ‘We don’t have the votes’. The control of the both chambers has led to Republicans rejecting bills based on ideology and not merit e.g. the rejection of Affordable Care Act even though Obama won election on it
o Weak at home: Senate. The Senate checks the president through confirmations. The Senate has rejected Debo Adegbile to top civil rights post. They have also rejected treaties e.g. UN disability rights. The Senate also has the ability to filibuster as was done by Cruz on Obamacare, and is done on around 70% of bills. Prevents Obama from passing legislation.
o Strong abroad: Bypass Congress. Executive has found ways of bypassing Congress in regards to foreign policy. E.g. in declarations of war they are called peace keeping missions as done in Iraq. Obama has accused of circumventing Senate in treaties e.g.2 Obama accused of this in Paris climate deal talks. The use of deception to bypass Congress e.g.3 the Obama administration secretly agreed to talks to formally end the Korean war
o Strong abroad: Constitution. The President is the commander-in-chief, and can use this power e.g. the assassination of Bin Laden even though this broke international law. E.g2 he used his powers to withdraw troops from Iraq and Afghanistan. Also, US vs. Curtiss-Wright established supremacy of the executive branch in foreign affairs and the President had plenary powers in the foreign affairs field that were not dependent upon congressional delegation.
• Evidence against
o Strong at home: Presidential veto. The President can return legislation back to the originating house e.g. Keystone Pipeline XL, Obama arguing its approval should rest with the executive. Though Congress can override, this is rare as it requires a ⅔ majority and has yet to happen to Obama. There is also the pocket veto which can not be overridden e.g. Clean Power Plan. Even the threat of a veto is significant e.g. Obama threatened to veto House Republicans who pushed for a Syrian Refugee Bill leading to Republicans amending the more ‘extreme’ aspects of the bill.
o Strong at home: Routes around congressional obstruction. The President has the use of the executive veto which Congress cannot overturn e.g. 2012 with Obama halting the deportation of hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children. The President also has the ability to make recess appointments to fill a vacancy which does not need to be approved by Congress till the end of the calendar year e.g.Obama made 32 as of May 2015 and there has been debate whether he will use it following Scalia’s death
o Weak abroad: Multiple agencies. Other agencies in the federal bureaucracy have a stake in foreign policy. the two federal departments most concerned with foreign policy, Defense and State, will have their own agenda e.g. Panetta’s memoirs blasted Obama’s foreign policy in Syria and Iraq. Also, the size of the federal bureaucracy means they follow own agenda e.g. Iran-Contra affair involved the bureaucracy supplying arms to Iran
o Weak abroad: Congress. They may refuse to ratify treaties e.g. UN disability rights treaty. Also they may use the power of the purse to prevent the president from carrying out foreign policy e.g. this is perceived as a threat if he closes Guantanamo Bay

32
Q

Explain the argument that the power of the President is the power to persuade

A

Neustadt argued that ‘Presidential power is the power to persuade’. This theory argues that the President is inherently weak due to constitutional limits and constraints. The key to being an effective president is the capacity to bargain successfully.
• Evidence president is limited to persuasion
o Checks and balances. Almost every power the president has, Congress is able to check. Therefore, the president needs Congress’s agreement to perform certain actions. For example, the President made speeches at Congress to persuade Congressmen to vote in favour of military strikes in Syria as although he is commander of the armed forces, Congress holds the power of the purse and ability to declare war
o Power of the purse. Even though Obama can use executive orders and presidential vetoes to pass or block legislation, this could lead to the Republican House, blocking funding e.g. Obama is trying to persuade Congress to close Guantanamo Bay as the use of an executive order may lead to a loss of funding as Congress has the power of the purse.
o Polarisation. Greater polarisation has led to hyper partisanship which makes it extremely difficult for legislation to be passed due to a lack of consensus. For example, to get the Affordable Care Act Obama had numerous one-on-one meetings with key figures such as moderate Republican Olympia Snowe, who eventually voted in favour of Obamacare.
o Weak parties. It is not uncommon for members of Congress to vote against the party line which requires the President to step in and persuade them to vote in his favour as the whipping system is weak. This is because congressmen have their own mandate, and have an electorate to satisfy. The President may offer to help with legislation that benefits a member’s state e.g. great deal of bargaining in Obamacare

• Evidence against
o Presidential veto. The President can return legislation back to the originating house e.g. Keystone Pipeline XL, Obama arguing its approval should rest with the executive. Though Congress can override, this is rare as it requires a ⅔ majority and has yet to happen to Obama. There is also the pocket veto which can not be overridden e.g. Clean Power Plan. Even the threat of a veto is significant e.g. Obama threatened to veto House Republicans who pushed for a Syrian Refugee Bill leading to Republicans amending the more ‘extreme’ aspects of the bill.
o Routes around congressional obstruction. Doesn’t have to persuade as the President has the use of the executive veto which Congress cannot overturn e.g. 2012 with Obama halting the deportation of hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children. The President also has the ability to make recess appointments to fill a vacancy which does not need to be approved by Congress till the end of the calendar year e.g.Obama made 32 as of May 2015 and there has been debate whether he will use it following Scalia’s death
o Foreign policy. Executive has found ways of bypassing Congress in regards to foreign policy. E.g. in declarations of war they are called peace keeping missions as done in Iraq. Obama has been accused of circumventing Senate in treaties e.g.2 Obama accused of this in Paris climate deal talks. The use of deception to bypass Congress e.g.3 the Obama administration secretly agreed to talks to formally end the Korean war. Also, he can act unilaterally as he is the commander in chief and used this power to withdraw troops from Afghanistan and Iraq. Obama didn’t have congressional authorisation for military intervention in Libya
o Signing statements. An accompanying document to a bill that the President has signed into law stating how a bill should be interpreted or implemented. Obama stated that he would not use signing statements when asked, but did in 2011 to soften welfare changes made by Congress. The ABA has argued that 56% of Obama’s signing statements raise constitutional issues. Can also be done on foreign policy e.g. Freedom of Ukraine Support Act 2014. This can implement legislation sometimes in direct contravention of Congress’ expressed intent

33
Q

Explain the argument of the imperilled presidency

A
  • Partisanship. This has made it increasingly difficult to get programmes passed, especially in the case Obama’s ‘legacy’ areas. For example, climate change was a major campaign theme but the Waxman-Markey bill was abandoned in the Senate, Harry Reid conceded ‘We don’t have the votes’. The control of the both chambers has led to Republicans rejecting bills based on ideology and not merit e.g. the rejection of Affordable Care Act even though Obama won election on it
  • Senate. The Senate checks the president through confirmations. The Senate has rejected Debo Adegbile to top civil rights post. They have also rejected treaties e.g. UN disability rights. The Senate also has the ability to filibuster as was done by Cruz on Obamacare, and is done on around 70% of bills. Prevents Obama from passing legislation.
  • Power of the purse. Even though Obama can use executive orders and presidential vetoes to pass or block legislation, this could lead to the Republican House, blocking funding e.g. Obama is trying to persuade Congress to close Guantanamo Bay as the use of an executive order may lead to a loss of funding as Congress has the power of the purse.
  • Multiple agencies involved in foreign policy. Other agencies in the federal bureaucracy have a stake in foreign policy. the two federal departments most concerned with foreign policy, Defense and State, will have their own agenda e.g. Panetta’s memoirs blasted Obama’s foreign policy in Syria and Iraq. Also, the size of the federal bureaucracy means they follow own agenda e.g. Iran-Contra affair involved the bureaucracy supplying arms to Iran