Valid argument forms Flashcards

(29 cards)

1
Q

What is the form of modus ponens?

A

If p, then q.
p.
Therefore, q.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the form of modus tollens?

A

If p, then q.
Not q.
Therefore, not p.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the form of disjunctive syllogism?

A

Either p or q.
Not p.
Therefore, q.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the form of hypothetical syllogism?

A

If p, then q.
If q, then r.
So, if p, then r.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the form of dilemma?

A

Either p or q.
If p, then r.
If q, then s.
Either r or s.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a conditional statement?

A

If p, then q.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

If p, then q. State the antecedent and the consequent.

A

Antecedent—p
Consequent—q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is validity?

A

validity is only concerned with the link between the conclusion and the premise.
It is not concerned with the truth/falsity of the premises or the conclusion.
A valid argument is one where the conclusion must be true if the premises are true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

An argument that follows a valid argument form is necessarily valid. True of false?

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

An argument that follows an invalid argument is almost always (but not necessarily) invalid. True or false?

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the form of denying the antecedent?

A

If p, then q.
Not p.
Therefore, not q.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the form of affirming the consequent?

A

If p, then q.
q.
Therefore, p.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is soundness?

A

Concerned with the premise in a valid argument.
An argument is sound if the argument is valid and all its premises are true.
Soundness=Validity + Truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is “due to” a premise indicator?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Is “We can infer this from” a premise indicator?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Is “as a result of” a premise indicator?

17
Q

Is “for” a premise indicator?

18
Q

Is “consequently” a conclusion indicator?

19
Q

Is “as such” a conclusion indicator?

20
Q

Is “ we can infer that” a conclusion indicator?

21
Q

Is “as a result” a conclusion indicator?

22
Q

Is “henceforth” an indicator?

23
Q

Is “in summary” an indicator?

24
Q

Is “if” and “either” an indicator?

25
My stand is that the state of nature is warlike. This can be seen from the fact that there is no clear authority figure in the state of nature, and when you have a group of people Iiving together without one, there will be chaos and fighting. How many premises are there here in the subject of philosophy? Which of the following statement about the argument, as it is presented in the passage, is false? A) There is a derived premise. B) There are no conclusion indicators used. C) There is only one premise indicator used. D) With the addition of a conditional, it can be in the form of a Modus Ponens.
A or B
26
Select the correct definitions for validity and soundness. (A) Validity --> follows a valid argument form e.g. modus ponens Soundness --> valid argument with all true premises (B) validity --> conclusion necessarily follows from the premises Soundness --> all true premises and a true conclusion (C) Validity --> Premises necessarily lead to the conclusion Soundness--> valid argument containing no false premises (D) Validity--> sound argument with all true premises Soundness --> conclusion necessarily follows from the premises
C for option A, the definition for validity is false while the definition for soundness is true for option B the definition for validity is true while the definition for soundness is false for option c, the definitions for validity and soundness are true for option d, both definitions are false
27
Which of the following statements about counter-arguments is false? (A) A counter-argument can be an argument to show that the original argument is invalid. (B) A counter-argument can challenge the truth of an explicit premise of the original argument. (C) A counter-argument can challenge the conclusion of the original argument. (D) A counter-argument can be unsound.
C
28
Consider any argument with three premises. Which of the following statements about this argument is false? (A) if one of the premises, is false, the argument cannot be sound (B) if all the premises are true, the conclusion has to be true. (C) if the conclusion is false, the argument cannot be sound. (D) all the premises can be false.
B based on the question "consider any argument" means that it can be invalid or unsound for A, valid argument with only true premises will have a true conclusion so if one premise is false, it will mot be valid and thus not be sound for B, only for valid arguments but since it is "consider any arguments" it will not be the case and will not be true for other arguments for C, conclusion has to be true to show that it is valid. if conclusion is false, it is not valid and thus not sound. for d, you won't know if all the premises can be false.
29