VALUE FREE Flashcards
(15 cards)
Value freedom
Idea that values and beliefs of researcher don’t enter research and results
MAIN ARGUMENTS
Value freedom is possible
Sociology is inevitably value laden
Sociology should be committed to and fight for disadvantaged groups
VALUE FREE AS POSSIBLE
Methods used so subjectivity of researcher don’t influence research
There are high in validity, reliability, quantifiable open to critique
VALUE FREE AS DESIREABLE
POSITIVISTS = Soc can and should be no different from physical sciences, can be OBJECTIVE
VALUE LADEN
NOT POSSIBLE:
No shared paradigm
Domain assumptions
Subject matter
Funding bodies
Research as one viewpoint in many (PM)
SHARED PARADIGMS
KUHN = Value free as myth,scientists influenced by paradigms
Paradigm = Framework of knowledge through which ppl see world/science ideas e.g, gravity as agreed concept after Newtons discovery
DOMAIN ASSUMPTIONS
GOULDNER = Influenced by domain assumptions i.e. basic ideas ab social life + nature of soc
Effective ‘value freedom’ such as observation, allow researchers see social world directly
SUBJECT MATTER
Issues not just values of researcher but also subject matter
VF as difficult in Sociology, human behaviour unpredictable
Hawthorne Effect and Social Desirability
FUNDING BODIES
Socs noted funding for research
Research may be based on what get funded, rather than research focus
VALUE COMMITED
Soc as NOT value free, SHOULD embrace values
JONES = 2 broad approaches:
Compassionate soc = Becker
Political radical approach = Gouldner, Marxists, Feminists
NOT because research data produced for case in changing policy, YES FOR LADEN
SOCIAL ACTION
BECKER = Underdog perspective, change society through research
Socs should CHALLENGE assumptions of wider society e.g. labelling
MARXISM
Role of research to uncover ways society benefits RC
CAPITALISM challenged = class consciousness
WILLIS = Wc boys in low paid jobs
EVAL
GOULDNER = Action, research lead change
FEMINISTS
NO value free = Research as malestream
EXPOSE dominance, change world + patriarchy
OAKLEY = ‘Collab friends’ , subjects as co-researcher to see exploitation, involve women
METHODOLOGICAL PLURALISM
Objectivity and subjectivity if funding available
CAN be BOTH value free and laden
EVAL = PET issues
Increased time + cost, compromise ethics? , complex to analyse data