Vitiating Factors Flashcards
(16 cards)
Effect of:
* Misrepresentation
* Mistake
* Duress
* Undue Influence
* Illegality
Misrep: Voidable (recission)
Mistake: Void (no legal effect from outset)
Duress: Voidable (recission)
Undue Influence: Voidable (recission)
Illegality: void (no legal effect from outset)
Bars to recission
- Delay
- Affirmation
- Restitution impossible (cannot return parties to original position (e.g. decreased in value / subject changed)
- 3rd party acquires rights (transferred to bona fide purchaser before given notice of recission)
Measure of damages in tort of deceit
Put parties in position had misrepresentation not have been made
Is misrepresentation actionable?
Untrue statement of fact which induced C to enter contract
Untrue statement
- oral, writing, conduct NOT silence unless fiduciary, insurance, half-truth, failure to disclose change in circumstances
Fact
- NOT intention unless never held intention
- NOT opinion unless no reasonable grounds for opinion or D is an expert in comparison to C
Made by a contracting party
Otherwise, maybe negligent misstatement
Induced C to enter contract
- Rep must have been material -or- C must prove they were subjectively induced
- Unlikely to be a misrep if appointed an expert or correct position set out in contract
Remedy for mispresentation
Remedy depends on D’s culpability:
Fraudulent (i.e. D lied): Recission + damages in tort of deceit
Negligent: Recission + damages in tort of deceit
Innocent (D had reasonable grounds to beleive statement was true): Recisssion only
Common Mistake
Both parties made same fundamental mistake (must render contract impossible or radically different)
* Includes: mistake over existence of subject matter (e.g. destroyed in fire)
* Excludes: mistakes over quality of subject matter (e.g. both parties think painting is famous)
Cross-Purpose / Mutual Mistake
Both parties are mistaken, but they are msitaken about different things (i.e. negotiated at cross purposes)
* A offers one thing whilst B accepts another (A selling black horse but B thinks grey horse)
But, if a reasonable person would infer contract exists, contract binding despite material mistake
Unilateral mistake
One party is mistaken and the other knows this
- buyer knows seller has made a mistake on price = void
- C signs a doc not knowing its nature = void
- Mistake as to identity (not face to face) and identity is of vital importance (not creditworthiness) = void
Illegality - what, types and effect
Formation, purpose or performance involves in the commission of a legal wrong
Formation / purpose: commit crime / restraint of trade unless protects legitimate business interest and reasonable in area, scope and duration.
Performance
- void if both parties know illegal
- voidable if innocent party does not about illegal performance
Effect
- court will consider whether allowing recovery woudl harm the integrity of the legal system / whether denial woudl be a proportionate response to the illegality
Duress - definition
Threat of violence or threat to breach contract (economic duress)
Types of duress and when each type will voidable contract
Duress to person: contract voidable if threat one reason entered / agreed to variation
- note: presumed unless D can prove otherwise
Duress to property: contract voidable if threat sole reason entered / agreed to variation
Economic duress: contract voidable if:
1. Lack of practical choice (i.e. avoid breaching another contract / damage to economic interest / unable to get goods elsewhere)
2. Illegitimate pressure
(a) Threat to breach contract
(b) D acted in bad faith (e.g. extortion, costs increasing NOT genuine belief entitled to money)
(c) V protested at time; and
(d) V did not affirm or seek to rely on contract (takes immediate action once pressure has ceased)
3. Illegitimate pressure is a significant / decisive reason (no other factors induced C)
Undue influence definition
Influence goes beyond what is regarded as acceptable
or
D takes advantage of a position of influence
Types of undue influence
Actual undue influence: D acquired influence over C’s mind so as to preclude free will
Presumed undue influence:
1. Relationship of trust and confidence Automatic if: fiduciary / parent child
Must prove if: spouse / employer
2. Transaction calls for an explanation (not for V’s benefit or exposes V to risk)
When can a lender enforce security? (i.e. sue wife if husband defaults)
Lender cannot enforce security if they actual or constructive notice of D’s undue influence
A lender will have constructive notice if:
1. L ought to have been put on inquiry (non-commercial relationship + not for joint benefit)
2.L did not take reasonable steps to ensure wife aware of implications (either private meeting with wife + advise takes ILA -or- wife received ILA)