Vocab List 3 Flashcards

(38 cards)

0
Q

Warrant

A

Expresses the assumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Argument

A

A persuasive discourse, a coherent and considered movement from a claim to a conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Qualifier

A

(Usually, probably) tempers the claim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Claim

A

The argument’s main position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Claim of fact

A

Asserts something is true or not true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Claim of policy

A

Proposing a change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Claim of value

A

Common type of claim, argues that something is good or bad.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Introduction

A

Introduces the reader to the topic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Narration

A

Explaining the topic in further detail.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Confirmation

A

What the thesis is, analysis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Refutation

A

Addressing other points but defending your own.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Conclusion

A

Ending your argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Syllogism

A

logical argument composed of three parts:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Major premise

A

which forms the predicate of the conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Minor premise

A

The premise in a syllogism containing the minor term, which will form the subject of the conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Toulmin model

A

An approach to argument by Stephen Toulmin.

16
Q

Backing

A

Consists of further assurances of data.

17
Q

Rebuttal

A

Gives voice to objection.

18
Q

Reservation

A

Explains terms and conditions necessitated by the qualifier.

19
Q

Rogerian argument

A

Based on the assumption that having a full understanding of an opposing position is essential to responding to it persuasively.

20
Q

Open thesis

A

Does not list all the points the writer intends to cover in an essay,

21
Q

Closed thesis

A

A statement of the main idea of the argument that also previews the major points of an author.

22
Q

Fallacy

A

An argument that uses poor reasoning.

23
Q

Logical fallacy.

A
  • a fallacy in logical argumentation
24
Hasty generalization
reaching an inductive generalization based on insufficient evidence—essentially making a hasty conclusion without considering all of the variables.
25
Faulty causality
(sometimes called Post Hoc) is a rhetorical fallacy in which the underlying assumption is that if one event happened before another, the first actually caused the second.
26
Ad hominem
a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.
27
Straw man fallacy
misrepresentation of the topic of argument.
28
Faulty analogy
This fallacy consists in assuming that because two things are alike in one or more respects, they are necessarily alike in some other respect.
29
Enthymeme
an informally stated syllogism (a three-part deductive argument) with an unstated assumption that must be true for the premises to lead to the conclusion.
30
2nd hand evidence
This term is used for hearsay evidence that a person has learned from another person and has not seen or heard themselves.
31
1st hand evidence
is evidence that comes from someone that witnessed/was apart of whatever the situation is.
32
Quantitative evidence.
Data expressed in numbers or stats.
33
Slippery slope
which a person asserts that some event must inevitably follow from another without any rational argument or demonstrable mechanism for the inevitability of the event in question.
34
Scare tactics
1. | a strategy intended to influence public reaction by the exploitation of fear.
35
Begging the question
conclusion that one is attempting to prove is included in the initial premises of an argument, often in an indirect way that conceals this fact.
36
Circular reasoning
which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with.
37
Assumption
An statement at the end.