Voting Behaviour and Media Flashcards
(50 cards)
What is Psephology?
The study of voting behaviour, involving statistics and data.
What is Partisan voting?
- Voting which is aligned with social class. Eg, lower classes vote for Labour and upper classes vote for Conservative.
What is class dealignment?
- People are less likely to consider themselves a certain class, affecting their support for individual parties.
What is partisan dealignment?
The outcome of class dealignment. People do not vote in line with their social class.
What did Peter Pulzer say regarding to voting behaviour?
“Class is the basis of British party politics, everything else is embellishment and detail”.
What is the sociological model of voting behaviour?
- Emphasises the influence of social factors such as class, ethnicity, religion, and regional identity on how individuals vote.
- This means that people from certain socio-economic backgrounds or geographic regions are more likely to support particular parties due to shared values, experiences, or interests.
What is the dominant ideology regarding the media?
The media determine the agenda, and transmit these values to voters. Usually the media is linked to the wealthiest in society, who dominate the agenda.
What is the rational choice model?
Views voting as a rational decision-making process where voters weigh the costs and benefits of different options and choose the one that aligns most closely with their preferences and interests.
- Recognises that most voters are not strong identifiers and have no real connection with the political parties - they are essentially unaligned.
- Voters decide how to vote on the basis of a series of judgements* made about several relevant factors.
- For example: a party’s track record, election manifesto, the party leaders, single issues.
- This means that voters make a decision not based on class, age, ethnicity or gender or party identification but on who will benefit them and their families
What are the Social Grades between A-E?
- A: Administrative
- B: Intermediate administrative
- C1: Supervisory
- C2: Skilled manual worker
- D: Semi and unskilled worker
- E: State pensioners or unemployed with state benefits.
How relevant is class now?
- In 1970, over 90% of votes went to Labour and Conservatives, showing high levels of class alignment.
- However 2010 was a historic low for the combined vote of Lab/ Cons vote at just 57%.
How has the changing structure of the UK economy impact class dealignment?
Less traditional industry following Thatcher policies, and the rise of a service based economy has blurred traditional class ideas.
How has increased social mobility impact class dealignment?
Increased social mobility has allowed individuals to move between social classes more freely than in previous generations. We can link this with improved education opportunities compared to 50+ years ago.
How has the changing party policies impact class dealignment?
Changing party policies. If we consider where parties are plotted on the political spectrum to 1970 we can see big shifts, and internal party factions. It is possible that this has been as a response to dealignment as a result of the afore factors however.
Case Study: Leadership Quality comparison between Major vs Blair 1997?
- Blair was known for his strong oratory skills and ability to effectively communicate his message to the public.
- He presented a confident and charismatic image, which resonated with many voters and helped him to connect with the electorate on a personal level.
- Major was often criticised for his less polished communication style and perceived lack of charisma.
- Impact: For a myriad of reasons, Blair wins a landslide in 1997 with 418 out of 650 seats.
Case Study: Leadership Qualities of Thatcher 1979?
- Voters are arguably now prepared to vote more imaginatively than based on class or attachment. We may refer to this as voter volatility.
- Leadership is a factor which affects voting behaviour.
- Presenting as confident, collected during a crisis, and having a strong strategy is desirable in the eye of the voter.
- Thatcher went on to become a good leader in her dealings with many issues, although arguably this is not what her initial electoral success can be attributed to.
Case Study: Leadership Quality comparison between Brown vs Cameron 2010?
- In a common pattern, Gordon Brown was regularly perceived to be a “moodier” character than David Cameron.
- Gordon Brown was also perceived as weak after failing to call an election in the first October of his premiership, despite polls showing he would win.
- David Cameron came off particularly charismatic at the 2010 Conservative Party Conference.
- Impact: this was a fatal combination for Brown who failed to secure the highest number of votes in 2010.
- Impact: this was a fatal combination for Brown who failed to secure the highest number of votes in 2010.
Case Study: Valance (Single) Issues impacting voting - Iraq War?
- Critics accused Blair of misleading the public about the reasons for going to war.
- There was a belief that Blair exaggerated or misrepresented intelligence about Iraq’s possession of weapons of mass destruction.
- Some seen the decision to go to war as defying international consensus and the United Nations Security Council. Blair’s close alignment with the Bush administration in the United States, despite widespread opposition from other countries.
- **Impact: Blair loses over 100 seats (and his majority in Parliament) from 2001 to 2005. **
Case Study: Valance (Single) Issues impacting voting - Black Wednesday-?
September 1992- known as ‘Black Wednesday’, the Pound was forced out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM).
Before Black Wednesday, the U.K. had been in the European ERM for two years.
However, the pound was depreciating and falling close to the lower limits set by the ERM. The British government took steps to bolster the pound, including raising interest rates and authorising the use of foreign currency reserves to purchase pound.
Case Study: How does leadership qualities affect voting - Major vs Blair 1997?
- Blair was known for his strong oratory skills and ability to effectively communicate his message to the public.
- He presented a confident and charismatic image, which resonated with many voters and helped him to connect with the electorate on a personal level.
- Major was often criticised for his less polished communication style and perceived lack of charisma.
- **Impact: for a myriad of reasons, Blair wins a landslide in 1997 with 418 out of 650 seats. **
Case Study: How does leadership qualities affect voting - Thatcher 1979?
- Voters are arguably now prepared to vote more imaginatively than based on class or attachment. We may refer to this as voter volatility.
- Leadership is a factor which affects voting behaviour.
- Presenting as confident, collected during a crisis, and having a strong strategy is desirable in the eye of the voter.
- Thatcher went on to become a good leader in her dealings with many issues, although arguably this is not what her initial electoral success can be attributed to.
Case Study: How does leadership qualities affect voting - Brown vs Cameron?
- In a common pattern, Gordon Brown was regularly perceived to be a “moodier” character than David Cameron.
- Gordon Brown was also perceived as weak after failing to call an election in the first October of his premiership, despite polls showing he would win.
- David Cameron came off particularly charismatic at the 2010 Conservative Party Conference.
- **Impact: this was a fatal combination for Brown who failed to secure the highest number of votes in 2010. **
Case Study: How do Valence (Single) Issues affect voting behaviour - Iraq War?
- Critics accused Blair of misleading the public about the reasons for going to war.
- There was a belief that Blair exaggerated or misrepresented intelligence about Iraq’s possession of weapons of mass destruction.
- Some seen the decision to go to war as defying international consensus and the United Nations Security Council. Blair’s close alignment with the Bush administration in the United States, despite widespread opposition from other countries.
- Impact: Blair loses over 100 seats (and his majority in Parliament) from 2001 to 2005.
Case Study: How do Valence (Single) Issues affect voting behaviour - Black Wednesday?
- September 1992- known as ‘Black Wednesday’, the Pound was forced out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM).
- Before Black Wednesday, the U.K. had been in the European ERM for two years.
- However, the pound was depreciating and falling close to the lower limits set by the ERM. The British government took steps to bolster the pound, including raising interest rates and authorising the use of foreign currency reserves to purchase pound.
- Impact: humiliation of John Major’s government fatally damaged the Conservative Party’s reputation for economic competence, paving the way for Tony Blair.
Case Study: How do Valence (Single) Issues affect voting behaviour - European Relations/ Immigration, 2010 and Beyond?
- Brexit has become a dominant issue in UK politics, prompting some voters to engage in single-issue voting.
- This has led to increased volatility in elections, as voters prioritize their views on Brexit above other policy considerations.
- This has also led to polarisation (divisions) within parties.