Voting Systems Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

What type of system is FPTP?

A

plurality system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How can this lead to a two party nation?

A

> partly because it’s a winner takes all systems with each constituency being won by one candidate no matter the voter share.
as a result FPTP favours parties with a reasonable concentration of support across a large geographical area.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give me an example of FPTP being a winner takes all system?

A

In 2017 North East Fife was won by the SNP by two votes after three recounts, the party in second place gained nothing as a result of two mere votes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the winners bonus associated with FPTP?

A

> Not an actual winners bonus
More FPTP tending to over reward the winner of the election in seats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why is this?

A

Because FPTP is not a national vote in the same way PR is it’s more a collection of 650 individual small scale votes in a winner takes all system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give me an example of a winners bonus?

A

> 1997 Labour got 43% of the national vote but 63% of the seats
conservatives in 2015 got 37% of the vote but 51% of the seats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are safe seats?

A

> A seat where a particular party has strong voter loyalty and is almost guaranteed the win, such as West Leicester and the Labour Party.
come about due to winner takes all system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a swing seat?

A

A seat where the voter loyalty within a constituency is evenly split. Such as Loughborough.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the advantage of simplicity in FPTP

A

> FPTP is a simply system that the voter and administration can understand.
resulting a quick and cost effective election.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the advantage of FPTP bringing about a strong gov?

A

> traditionally FPTP has been praised for providing the country with a clear legitimate winner
this is due to the winners bonus providing parties with a strong majority and mandate leading to effective gov.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the advantage of FPTP and constituency links?

A

> As FPTP divides the UK into 650 constituencies with a local MP elected in each one it means voters can have a direct impact.
meaning MP’s are more likely to remedy local issues in order to seek re election

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does FPTP bring about centrist policies?

A

> FPTP narrows the UK into a two party system
meaning labour and conservative have to cover a lot of political middle ground to ensure votes
meaning they generally produce widely accepted and popular policies in their manifesto.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is voter choice limited by FPTP

A

> the simplicity of FPTP is down to its winner takes all system but this means for a lot of voters their only choices are conservative or labour as they’re the only parties with a real chance of winning
means people are often voting for the least worse candidate presenting FPTP as un democratic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How doee FPTP create un equal voting?

A

> to achieve a ‘strong’ government the winner takes all system values votes unequally, as those in safe seats votes are largely futile.
whilst in swing seats the outcome could be decided by a few votes making each vote critical
this undermines the principle of representative democracy in the UK.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does FPTP create a lack of a majority?

A

> due to FPTP being a plurality system it means a candidate can win a constituency with less than 50% of the votes
often in swing seats a candidate can win with less than 50% of the votes meaning more people voted against them than for them. Leaving the vast majority of constituents under represented.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does FPTP exclude smaller parties?

A

FPTP over represents the main parties and underrepresents the smaller parties, this exclusion of the smaller parties in undemocratic.

17
Q

What developments have been made in the 21st century regarding FPTP?

A

> increase in the number of votes for third parties excacerbate the issue of unrepresentative results and the infamous winners bonus
failure to deliver a strong single party government in both, 2010 and 2017 with the conservatives having to form a coalition, and in 2015 the conservatives had a 1% parliamentary majority.

18
Q

When is AMS used?

A

> Scottish elections
Welsh elections

19
Q

What two types of votes are used in the AMS system?

A

> regional vote
constituency vote

20
Q

How is the constituency vote done?

A

> the same way FPTP is

21
Q

How is the regional vote performed?

A

> each region in Scotland has 7 MSP’s and there are eight regions in Wales each region has 4 members and there are 5 regions.
each party is allocated a number of seats using the D’hondt method
it is not a winner takes all system
the 1 seat is given to the party with the highest number resulting from the D’hondt calculation this process is repeated until all seats in a region are allocated

22
Q

How is AMS more proportional than FPTP?

A

> the second stage of the AMS corrects the issues of FPTP. The more seats a party gains in the constituency vote, the harder it is to gain regional seats as its votes will be divided by a higher number. This reduces wasted votes and ensures political parties have a higher chance of being represented.

23
Q

What is the advantage of split ticket voting?

A

Voters have more choice with two votes to cast. So they can choose the right to vote for two parties. Encouraging more parties to run, particularly in the regional vote.

24
Q

How does AMS produce governments with broader popularity?

A

In order to form a single party government a party must have a broader popularity across the whole country. Not just in concentrated pockets. If a coalition is formed a greater amount of parties can have impact on policy, supporting the notion that AMS produces governments with greater legitimacy.

25
How does AMS produce greater representation than FPTP?
All areas are represented by a constituency and regional representatives, increasing voter turnout.
26
How is AMS complex?
> Process after voting is complicated potentially discouraging people from voting > Also creates two tiers of representatives, a constituency and a regional MSP, this can create tension and confuse voters.
27
How is party control increased in AMS?
> the party has control over regional lists of candidates which the voter has no say over.
28
How is FPTP more likely to create a single party government than AMS?
> Unlikely single party government as it’s a more proportional system meaning it’s more likely to produce coalitions which can prove to be ineffective.
29
Where is Single transferable vote?
Northern Irish assembly
30
What is different about the STV system?
It’s the only ordinal voting system used in the UK
31
How is NI divided using STV?
Divided into 18 large multi member constituencies each electing six representatives to send to the Northern Irish assembly.
32
How does the voter vote?
> the voter is given a ballot paper with all the candidates in their reign, this may include candidates running for the same party. > they cast their ballot by numbering candidates 1,2 and 3 so on.
33
How are elections counted?
> in order to win a candidate needs to achieve the droop quota > any one who receives the quota is automatically given a seat, then their excess votes are redistributed according to any second preferences, if any more candidates recieve the droop quota they are then given a seat. > if any further seats are remains and no candidates receive the quota an elimination process is done where the candidate with the least amount of votes is eliminated and their votes are redistributed > this process is continued until all seats are filled
34
What are the advantages of STV?
> it’s the most proportional system in the UK, delivering the strongest correlation between voter percentage and percentage of seats gained > great degree of voter choice not only between parties but also within parties. > Greater representation- like AMS the multi member constituency means a voter is more likely to have someone elected who shares their ideological values.
35
What are the disadvantages of STV?
> Very complex- not for the voter but for the counting process, potentially lowering voter turnout > In NI as part of the Good Friday agreement the STV system was designed to create a power sharing gov potentially unfit for the whole of the UK > weak constituency link- with no local elected representatives and a large multimember constituencies the link between elected representatives and their voters is weak.
36
When was SV used?
> used to be used in London mayoral elections before being replaced by FPTP.
37
How does it work?
> all voters are given a ballot where they cast a first and second preference. > if one candidate immediately has a majority in first preferences they win > often this isn’t the case so all but the top two candidates are eliminated and their second preferences redistributed. > if a vote doesn’t have either second preference as the top two candidates their vote is ignored. > with all but the top two candidates left and second preferences redistributed their is a certain majority.
38
What are advantages of SV?
> ensures that the winning candidate a clear majority of votes ensuring a strong government with a relatively broad base of support, limiting the chance of an extremist party gaining power. > wide degree of voter choice as candidates can put a smaller party down in their 1st preference. > simply system- unlike the proportional systems SV is relatively easy to understand both in how votes are cast and counted increasing voter turn out.
39
What are the disadvantages of SV?
> two party dominance- the elimination of all but two candidates in one go means that third parties are unlikely to do well and the result is not proportional. > ‘false majority’- a candidate only needs to get a majority in the valid votes. > wasted votes- large number of votes which have little or no impact on the election.