W1 - TMS Flashcards

(35 cards)

1
Q

What is TMS

A

“Non-invasive” technique to create virtual cortical “lesions”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the basic properties of TMS and what does it allow us to understand

A
  • Temporary
  • Reversible
  • Localized

Allows us to understand function of specific brain regions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How is TMS applied. Go through the process

A

Externally - via a coil placed on the scalp

  1. ) Rapidly change magnetic field to
  2. ) Induce electrical currents in the brain
  3. ) Current depolarize neurons in a small, circumscribed area of cortex
  4. ) TMS-induced current causes neurons to fire randomly > neural noise increase > mask neurons which are firing correctly.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is rTMS

A

Modifiation of TMS where it creates fast sequence of pulses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does rTMS create a magnetic field strong enough for stimulation. What are the 2 requirements

A

Very fast loading times (~100-200 μs) and short duration (<1 ms)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the most common coil in TMS

A

Figure 8 Coil

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does the figure 8 coil generate currents. What is the result compared to round coils?

A
  • Generates magnetic fields in the opposite direction
  • Generates offset current loops that circulate in opposite directions

More precise stimulation and more focal of cortex compared to round coils

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the advantage of have a more focal area stimulated

A

The researcher knows which part of the cortex is affected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the first way TMS can be used to Bio Psych research

A

Injection of “neural noise” approach: Using single-pulse TMS to disrupt cognitive processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the logic behind the ‘neural noise’ approach

A

If single TMS pulse to specific region of cortex disrupts cognitive function > CAUSALITY (unlike neuroimaging)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How do we use the ‘neural noise’ approach

A

Interfere with the process of interest at exactly the

time window during which the regions is required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

‘Neural noise’: Do the regions associated with the process of interest stop working completely?

A

Region does not STOP working but the ‘neural noise’ interferes with it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

“Neural Noise” Amassian et al. (1989): Overview of their study and Aim

A

Overview:

  • 3 alphabetical letters as stimuli presented under difficult viewing conditions
  • Magnetic stimulation was applied ~ 2 cm
    above the inion over visual cortex

Aim:

Effects on letter perception when varying the interval
between visual stimuli and time point of TMS stimulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

“Neural Noise” Amassian et al. (1989): Results of their study

A

1.) Critical period (40 – 120 ms) stimulation affected
detection performance

  1. ) Shifting the stimulation site from left to right impaired perception of letters in the contra-lateral visual field
  2. ) Shifting TMS stimulation from top to bottom at midline (letters displayed vertically) > stimulation above the reference line suppressed letters at the bottom of the display [Stimulating below the centre not possible due to bone]
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

“Neural Noise”. Amassian et al. (1993). Aims of their study

A

Aim: Find out whether ‘visual mask’ can itself be ‘masked’ using single-pulse stimulation, thereby ‘unmasking’ the stimulus

(Since TMS disrupts stimuli, can it disrupt mask?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

“Neural Noise”. Amassian et al. (1993). Results of their study. And what does their 2 studies tell us

A

Without TMS, detection rate of target 0.37 at 100ms. With TMS, detection rate of target 0.9.

Critical Period: 60-140ms

Informs us about time-course of processing

17
Q

What is the second way TMS can be used to Bio Psych research

A

“Virtual lesion” approach: Using repetitive TMS to interrupt or enhance cognitive processing

18
Q

How does “Virtual lesion” via. rTMS work and why is it good

A

Inhibit cognitive functions for a longer period of time > Measure whether/how long a specific cognitive task is impaired

19
Q

What is the third way TMS can be used to Bio Psych research

A

The “probing excitability” approach using single-pulse TMS

20
Q

What does the “Probing Excitability” approach test in particular

A

For the Motor System

21
Q

What is the idea behind “Probing Excitability”. What is the measure of interest and what does it NOT do

A

If M1 is required for a cognitive task, then it should already be activated when single-pulse TMS is delivered.

Measure of Interest: How strongly M1 reacts to the pulse,

What does it NOT do: It does aim to disrupt cognitive function and examine effect on performance

22
Q

“Probing Excitability”: How does it measure M1 reaction

A

Using Motor Evoked Potential (MEPs), measured using Electromyogram (EMG) which is electrical activity of muscles

23
Q

“Probing Excitability”. Eisenegger et al. (2007): Aim

A

Aim: Is M1 involved in MR

24
Q

“Probing Excitability”. Eisenegger et al. (2007): Result

A
  • Stimulation of M1 during mental rotation elicited stronger MEPs as compared to baseline
  • M1 is more excitable during mental rotation and might be already activated, and hence, involved in the cognitive process
25
"Probing Excitability". Bode et al. (2007) Aim
Aim: Is M1 dependent on strategy?
26
"Probing Excitability". Bode et al. (2007) Result
MEPs were equally high for mental rotation of all | different stimuli, so probably strategy does not play a role
27
"Probing Excitability". Bode et al. (2007) Limitation
``` M1 could be more excitable because adjacent and interconnected regions (e.g., SMA) were activated ```
28
What is the fourth way TMS can be used to Bio Psych research
“Paired-pulse approach” : Probing information transfer
29
What is the logic behind "Paired-Pulse"
Two pulses in brief succession – sub-threshold and supra-threshold Examine how strongly the first pulse influences the effect of the second pulse.
30
"Paired Pulse" Fitzgerald et al. (2003). Aim and Methods
Schizophrenic difficulty to inhibit motor cortex. Produced the excitatory activity by a first TMS stimulus to the left motor cortex, and measured the excitability by assessing the effect of a second pulse (via MEPs)
31
What is the Cortical Silence Period in Schizophrenic Patients
Cooling down period to get rid of motor activity. A period of suppression of tonic motor activity that follows descending excitatory activity
32
"Paired Pulse" Fitzgerald et al. (2003). Results
Compared to controls, patients with and without medication showed stronger responses to the second pulse. i.e. cannot inhibit first sub-threshold pulse
33
What is TMS mainly used for in clinical application
Depression. (Though works for other mental disorders)
34
Why does TMS work for depression
Depression is linked to in imbalance of prefrontal activity between hemispheres TMS can stimulate prefrontal cortex to balance it out.
35
Where is the effect of the 'figure-8' coil the strongest
Strongest effect in centre with radius 3-4 mm