W4 - Decentralisation, urban governance, and policy mobilities in cities of the Global South Flashcards

(25 cards)

1
Q

Define decentralisation and its 3 different dimensions

A

Shift of competencies and resources from central to subnational levels of government like municipalities

1) Admin/Policy decentralisation - delegated functions to local agencies - at least one subnational tier has exclusive authority to make decisions

2) Political decentralisation - Regional and local governments are elected by popular vote

3) Fiscal decentralisation - Transfer of power to subnational to administer their own budgets, sharing tax revenue with regional governments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why do we need decentralisation?

A
  • Improve accountability and reduce corruption
  • Increase political competition, so politicians more responsive to citizens, increasing effectiveness of policy implementation
  • A key element of development as better ability to control resource allocation and
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give an overview of the early history of decentralisation in GS

A

Post independence - subnational levels of government had limited fiscal and human capital to take on new responsibility - negatively impacted the success

Post 1970 - decentralisation implemented at different rates in different countries, difficult to find right balance and sequence of the 3 dimensions. WB and UN pushed decentralisation

eg. Big bang in Indonesia vs gradual in India

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How are subnational government tiers geographically partitioned?

A

Functional argument - efficiency in public goods provision to determine optional size of governing units

Supply side argument - political benefits of admin unit proliferation for national execs as a tool for patronage and divide and rule strategy

Demand side arguments - Marginalised ethnic groups demanding new governing units to improve representation and accountability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give an overview of decentralisation to the urban level

A

Legal reforms increased autonomy for municipal governments and started local elections.

80% of total public spending was from local expenditures in China

Cities are affected differently by decentralisation as they are economic and politically salient making decentralisation prone to politicisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is urban governance?

A

The process that governments and stakeholders collectively decide how to plan, finance and manage urban areas (UN Habitat)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the normative discourse on “good” urban governance?

A

(Fox and Goodfellow)
Shift away from state driven development strategies due to increasing role of private sector and neoliberalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the impacts of decentralisation at the urban level in GS cities?

A

Diverse outcomes, discussed wrt 2 themes

1) Impacts on urban governance and democratisation
2) Impacts on substantive urban policies and urban services delivery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Give an overview of the link of decentralisation and democratisation at the urban level

A

Decentralisation is meant to foster political competition and therefore accountability, responsiveness and stronger citizen voices.

No automatic connection between these 2. The local politics opens up space for differing political opinions, but aren’t actually heard due to corruption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Give some optimistic views on decentralisation and good urban governance? wrt to participation

A

Can create conditions for increasing participation from less powerful social groups which can allow poorer urban residents to influence planning to be more pro poor - Watson

In LatAm, increased political power of slum residents as politicians have incentives to 1) not evict residents and 2) gain political favour by giving them land titles. So urban poor appear to exert more influence now

New generation of mayors are more progressive and connected to grassroots organisations - sometimes criticised for populism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Give an overview of the case of Brazils experience with decentralisation and urban governance

A

Social movements played a key role post military dictatorship.

There was uneven implementation, where in bigger cities master plans were influenced by neoliberal machines, but in others the voice of different interests resulted in a participatory and socially inclusive method.

Participatory budgeting where residents meet to challenge corruption, effective at mobilising the politically marginalised and the poor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the 5 challenge of urban participatory governance?

A

1) Limited awareness and capacity - limited opportunity for participation
2) Exclusion of marginalised groups - eg. disabled people and women face barriers to participation, must overcome inequalities to ensure inclusion
3) Power imbalances - Existing power structures of dominant groups may exert influence limiting the voices of other groups
4) Performative activism - no genuine influence on decision making, reducing the effectiveness of participation
5) Resource constraints - insufficient human, financial and technical capital limits the implementation of participatory governance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What 3 impacts can urban environmental social movements have?

A

(Carter)
1) Changes public attitudes and political agenda
2) Access to decision making bodies
3) Actual material results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Give 4 pessimistic views on decentralisation a and dive into them

A

Clientelism, populism, local elite capture, and corruption persist post municipal elections.

Decentralisation alone has done little to increase participation from the poor.

Clientelism/Patronage - politicians supply benefits in exchange for political support, prevelant in informal settlements and poor has no choice but to engage

Illegality - corrupt police, drug mafias will always exist in a city

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define corruption and its 3 main forms

A

abuse of entrust power for private gain - NGO Transparency International

1) Legislative and regulatory corruption - bribing rule makers to make or revise regulations
2) bureaucratic corruption - corrupt acts to speed up procedures
3) Public works corruption - eg. embezzling funds involved in building public infrastructure/services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give 3 direct/indirect negative consequences of corruption

A

1) Damages credibility of institutions
2) Distorts the market and inhibits economic growth
3) Loss of life, eg. Grenfell disaster

17
Q

Why is corruption in land development and urban planning problematic? Give 4 reasons

A

1) Planning decisions generate large economic returns
2) High degree of discretion in planning decisions where politics > sound technical rationale
3) Inside information as bargaining chips for personal gain
4) Not much accountability

18
Q

Does decentralisation improve the delivery of urban services? Give the 3 challenges and the example of Africa/Asia by Boex

A

Mixed evidence, differing effects within and between countries
Decentralisation does not necessarily lead to more autonomy for local actors or better delivery of services because of
1) Skills challenges - local officials often lack procedural knowledge diminishing their effectiveness
2) Financial challenges - if no local independent revenue sources, democracy is constrained by central authorities. Collecting local property taxes is difficult
3) Territorial and political fragmentation - Trade offs in decentralisation between local responsiveness and metropolitan level coordination eg. high political pressure on local officials to keep water fees low so can undermine efforts to maintain basic infrastructure

Boex et al - collected indicators on 1) solid waste management 2) water supply 3) sanitation services. Found that the role of urban local governments plays is at differing degrees in different countries, and they tend to have more control of 1) then 2) and 3) . In Africa/Asia constrained by limited freedom to delivery urbans services

19
Q

What are the 3 requirements for effective planning to exist?

A

(Watson)
1) A political system where the poor can make their voice heard
2) A local government with the capacity to deliver
3) Appropriate regulatory framework

20
Q

Give a brief overview on policy mobilities historical context

A

Colonialism imposed planning models and property rights
Globalisation led to rapid circulation of ideas
Governments look at what works elsewhere to find solutions to their own planning issues

21
Q

What policies get to circulate? Give an example

A

(Stead) - Techniques rather than ideas gets transferred eg. Good practises like the BRT although particular cases are made to be the gold standard example even though they are no better than other examples

22
Q

What direction does knowledge circulate in?

A

Historically GN to GS
Now more GS to GS transfers
Some GN cities looking to GS for good practises eg. participatory budgeting

23
Q

Who facilitates the circulation of knowledge? Give some examples of the actors

A

Transfer agents such as politicians, academics, consultancy’s, and international organisations (WB, UN (SDG 11), OECD)

24
Q

What channels and techniques does knowledge circulate through?

A

Internet, conferences, conditional funding
Decentralised developed cooperation - most aid is funnelled through central governments. Importance of exchanges of knowledge and resources via subnational governments.

25
What are the outcomes and impacts of urban policy mobilities?
Policy models are never fully replicated due to context differences and abstractness from "global best practise models", but some lessons are learned. - If implemented could harm the place Is it possible for one place to learn from another? Who benefits and loses from the transfer?