week 1 Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

Who are the lecturers for the LW104 Criminal Law module?

A

Dr Karen Brennan, Dr Ebba Lekvall, Prof Audrey Guinchard, Dr Sabina Garahan

Module director is Dr Ebba Lekvall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the core textbook for LW104 Criminal Law?

A

Smith, Hogan & Ormerod Essentials of Criminal Law (Law Trove)

This textbook is essential for understanding the principles of criminal law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the focus of substantive criminal law?

A

How criminal liability (i.e. offences/defences) is defined

It does not cover how crimes are investigated, procedural law, or sentencing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the main difference between civil law and criminal law according to Glanville Williams?

A

The legal consequences that may follow a wrongful act

The nature of the wrongful act may be the same in both cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is civil law primarily concerned with?

A

Disputes between parties (individuals or entities)

It can involve contracts or torts for compensation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does criminal law aim to do?

A

Punish wrongs viewed as public wrongs against the state

The state prosecutes, not the victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

List the purposes of criminal law.

A
  • To forbid and prevent harmful conduct
  • To subject to public control those disposed to commit crimes
  • To safeguard faultless conduct
  • To give fair warning of offences
  • To differentiate between serious and minor offences

Based on the American Law Institute’s draft model Penal Code.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How are offences classified?

A
  • By Source (common law or statutory)
  • By mode of trial (summary; indictable; either way)
  • By effect on the law of arrest
  • By subject matter (against the person; against property; mixed offences)
  • By fault-base (mens rea, negligence, strict liability)

Each classification helps in understanding the nature of the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the two main elements of criminal liability?

A

Actus Reus and Mens Rea

Actus Reus refers to the guilty act, and Mens Rea refers to the guilty mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define Actus Reus.

A

An act, omission or other event indicated in the definition of the crime, with any surrounding circumstances and required consequences

It encompasses all elements of the crime except the defendant’s state of mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What constitutes ‘conduct’ in Actus Reus?

A
  • Acts
  • Omissions
  • State of affairs
  • Surrounding circumstances
  • Consequences

These elements must be present in the definition of a crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is required to establish causation in result crimes?

A

A causal link between the defendant’s conduct and the result

For example, in murder, it must be proven that the defendant’s actions caused the victim’s death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the ‘but for’ test in factual causation?

A

Has it been established that the result would not have occurred as & when it did but for D’s conduct?

This test helps determine if the defendant’s actions were a necessary condition for the result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

True or False: The state prosecutes in civil law.

A

False

In civil law, the victim may take action against the wrongdoer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fill in the blank: A crime is viewed as a public wrong against the _______.

A

state

This highlights the distinction between public and private wrongs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does mens rea refer to?

A

Guilty mind

It indicates the mental state of the defendant at the time of the offence.

17
Q

What is the significance of the IRAC method in legal analysis?

A

Identify relevant parties and offence, establish legal rules, apply law to facts, conclude

This method helps in structuring legal arguments effectively.

18
Q

What is the role of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)?

A

To prosecute criminal cases

The CPS handles most prosecutions in the criminal justice system.

19
Q

What are the types of offences based on fault-base?

A
  • Offences requiring proof of mens rea
  • Offences satisfied by proof of negligence
  • Strict liability offences

These categories help determine the level of culpability required for different crimes.

20
Q

What must be established for factual causation?

A

Death would not have occurred when it did but for D’s act.

This means that if the result would have happened regardless of D’s actions, factual causation is not established.

21
Q

Does D’s conduct need to be the only cause of death for liability?

A

No, D’s conduct does not need to be the sole or main cause.

Factual causation can still be met even if there are multiple contributing factors.

22
Q

What is the difference between factual causation and legal causation?

A

Factual causation establishes a connection between D’s act and the result; legal causation determines the criminal liability.

Legal causation requires that D’s conduct be blameworthy and substantial.

23
Q

What does ‘blameworthy’ mean in the context of legal causation?

A

The result must be caused by the defendant’s culpable conduct.

This was illustrated in the case of R v Dalloway.

24
Q

What is the substantial contribution test in legal causation?

A

D’s conduct must have made a substantial contribution to the result.

It does not have to be the sole cause; it must be more than trivial.

25
What can break the chain of causation?
A novus actus interveniens can break the chain of causation. ## Footnote This includes acts of third parties, medical negligence, and acts of God.
26
In medical negligence cases, when does the chain of causation not break?
If the original wound is still the substantial and operating cause of death. ## Footnote This principle was established in Smith [1959].
27
What is the 'thin skull' rule?
Take your victim as you find them; D is liable for the full extent of the victim's injury, even if it was not foreseeable. ## Footnote This rule applies to both physical and non-physical vulnerabilities.
28
What happens if a victim's act is deemed 'daft'?
If V's act is so unreasonable that no reasonable person could foresee it, it may break the chain of causation. ## Footnote This principle is illustrated in the case of Roberts (1971).
29
What is the standard for a reasonable act of self-preservation in causation?
A reasonable act performed for self-preservation does not break the chain of causation. ## Footnote This was established in R v Pagett.
30
What is the legal principle regarding medical negligence and causation?
Medical negligence rarely breaks the chain of causation unless it is so extraordinary that it acts independently of D's conduct. ## Footnote This is supported by cases like Cheshire [1991].
31
What must be shown for legal causation to be established?
D's conduct must be blameworthy, substantial, and operating. ## Footnote This encompasses the overall contribution D's actions made to the result.
32
What is the basic rule regarding a victim's voluntary acts in relation to the chain of causation?
A free, deliberate and informed act by the victim will break the chain of causation. ## Footnote This principle is particularly significant in cases involving self-injection of drugs.
33
In R v Kennedy (No 2), what was the outcome of the House of Lords regarding the defendant's liability?
The conviction for Unlawful Act Manslaughter was quashed, establishing that the defendant was not the legal cause of the victim's death. ## Footnote The victim's act of self-injection was deemed a free, deliberate, and informed act.
34
What question arises regarding the voluntariness of a drug addict's act of self-injection?
Can we truly say that the act of self-injection by a drug addict is 'free, deliberate and informed'? ## Footnote This raises issues of moral responsibility and the nature of addiction.
35
What alternative legal theory can be applied in cases of drug-related deaths where the act of supply is not criminally liable?
Gross Negligence Manslaughter can be considered, particularly in cases like Evans (Gemma), where failure to act after the victim's overdose may lead to liability. ## Footnote This theory focuses on the duty to assist the victim rather than the act of supply itself.
36
What is the significance of the case Field [2021] EWCA Crim 380 in relation to voluntary acts?
The Court of Appeal found that the victim's act of drinking alcohol was not free, deliberate and informed due to the defendant's manipulation and deceit. ## Footnote The victim was misled into believing the alcohol was safe, leading to his death.
37
Under what conditions can a natural event break the chain of causation?
A natural event will only break the chain if it was not foreseeable by the defendant and is not reasonably foreseeable. ## Footnote This applies to scenarios where actions lead to unforeseen consequences, like drowning due to a tide or death from an earthquake.
38
True or False: A defendant is always liable for the consequences of their actions, regardless of intervening events.
False ## Footnote Liability can be broken by the victim's voluntary act or unforeseen natural events.
39
Fill in the blank: If D had administered or helped to administer the drug, then _______ could be found.
causation ## Footnote This highlights the difference in legal liability based on the defendant's involvement in the administration of the drug.