WEEK 11 Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

What are the two main types of incapacity defences in criminal law?

A

Insanity and automatism

Both are often referred to as incapacity defences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does insanity explain in relation to criminal responsibility?

A

Insanity explains lack of mens rea (MR) due to internal factors, including medical conditions

Example: D kills V under delusion they are breaking a jar.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does automatism explain in relation to criminal responsibility?

A

Automatism explains lack of mens rea (MR) due to external factors affecting D

Automatism denies an element of the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In a problem question, when should insanity and automatism be discussed?

A

After analyzing both actus reus (AR) and mens rea (MR)

Consider intoxication as well.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the presumption regarding a defendant’s mental state in insanity cases?

A

The law presumes that D is sane

D must prove insanity on the balance of probabilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the consequence of a successful insanity defence?

A

A special verdict of ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’

Governed by the Trial of Lunatics Act 1883.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the disposal options available after a successful insanity defence before 1991?

A

Indefinite detention in a hospital

Now, the court can impose a hospital order, supervision order, or absolute discharge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the M’Naughten rules regarding insanity?

A

D must be laboring under a defect of reason due to disease of the mind, not knowing the nature and quality of their act or that it was wrong

Established in M’Naughten [1843].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the legal definition of ‘disease of the mind’?

A

A legal concept, not medical; requires medical evidence

Examples include conditions affecting mental faculties like reason, memory, and understanding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What constitutes a ‘defect of reason’?

A

A deprivation of the power to reason, not mere stupidity or absent-mindedness

Clarke [1972] case illustrates this distinction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What must D demonstrate under the insanity defence regarding their understanding of their actions?

A

D must show they did not know the nature and quality of their act or that it was wrong

Codere [1916] and Windle [1952] provide examples.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the difference between insanity and automatism regarding causation?

A

Insanity is caused by internal factors; automatism is caused by external factors

Examples: mental disorders for insanity, concussion for automatism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the burden of proof in insanity cases?

A

Burden of proof is on D to prove insanity

This contrasts with automatism where burden of proof is on the prosecution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the definition of automatism in criminal law?

A

A state where D claims an external factor affected their body, causing lack of voluntariness

Full acquittal if successful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is required for D to successfully claim automatism?

A

D must act involuntarily, lacking voluntary control over bodily movements

Bratty [1963] defines involuntariness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What happens if D’s automatism is self-induced?

A

D is generally not allowed to use automatism as a defence

This is due to the prior fault rule.

17
Q

What must be established regarding the voluntariness of D’s actions in automatism cases?

A

D must show they acted involuntarily in a state of automatism

High level of involuntariness is required.

18
Q

What is the significance of the prior fault rule in automatism cases?

A

If D is found to have prior fault, they may be held liable

This applies particularly if D foresaw the risk of automatism.

19
Q

What is the difference between basic intent and specific intent crimes regarding automatism?

A

The classification affects whether automatism can be used as a defence

Self-induced automatism typically does not apply to specific intent crimes.

20
Q

What is the classification of an offence as either specific intent or basic intent?

A

The classification affects the application of defences like automatism.

21
Q

What is the prior fault test in relation to automatism?

A

The prior fault test is recklessness.

22
Q

In Bailey [1983], under what condition is D considered at prior fault?

A

If D subjectively foresaw the risk of automatism.

23
Q

True or False: Self-induced automatism may provide a defence to crimes of basic intent.

24
Q

What are dangerous drugs commonly known to create?

A

States of unpredictability or aggression.

25
What is the defence status for dangerous drugs in basic intent crimes?
No defence; D is reckless.
26
What can provide a full defence to all crimes when taken in compliance?
Non-dangerous drugs.
27
In what situation does a defence apply for basic intent crimes involving non-dangerous drugs?
If D was not reckless in taking the drug.
28
Fill in the blank: If D was subjectively reckless in knowing the risks of the drug, then there is _______.
no defence.
29
What does taking insulin not bar in terms of defence?
The defence of automatism.
30
What must the jury consider in cases involving diabetics?
Whether D's condition was due to a hypoglycaemic episode or alcohol.
31
According to Bailey [1983], what is not common knowledge regarding diabetics?
The consequences of failing to take food after an insulin injection.
32
When can self-induced automatism be used as a defence for specific intent crimes?
If D took a dangerous drug or medication not in line with prescription.
33
What is the general rule regarding intoxication and reliance on a defence?
D may not rely on an intoxicated mistaken belief.
34
What should be applied before other options when insanity is raised?
Insanity rules.
35
What happens when automatism is raised in the absence of prior fault?
D hasn’t committed an offence; no need to consider defences.
36
What is the outcome of identifying the correct rules between intoxication, automatism, and insanity?
It leads to different outcomes.
37
What does D's lack of MR due to voluntary consumption of a dangerous drug relate to?
Intoxication rules.
38
What is the purpose of the 'Your Essex Survey'?
To provide feedback on the learning experience.
39
True or False: Responses to the 'Your Essex Survey' are not anonymous.
False.