Week 11 Flashcards
(31 cards)
Blood donation in the past
Historically voluntary, local, altruistic
Wars, historical events shift
If blood is sold and commercialized, who is paying for it?
Commodification of the human body
Incentivizes mostly the poor to donate
Reinforces socioeconomic stratification
What are the positives of viewing blood as an economic good?
Value people’s time and discomfort
Augment economy
Redistribute the $ gains to support other needs or welfare
Economic view fails to take into account the social costs or externalities (and what is an externality?)
externality is a factor/outcome in a situation that is not directly affected by the transaction, but indirectly or secondarily affected. Thus, they might be considered outside or external to the transaction itself.
think of downstream effects such as hepatitis and medical malpractice insurance to counter cases or outcomes like this
4 criteria were used to compare commercialized blood donation and the voluntary blood donation systems in the UK and US
economic efficiency
administrative efficiency
cost per unit or price
purity, potency, and safety
According to Titmuss, the US ‘fails’ all of the criteria
The differences in cost per unit in US £10-20/pint vs. UK £2/pint (circa 1970)
the gap lately is not as much, avg. US $200/unit vs. UK $200/pint vs. Canada $250/unit (all USD)
The US system sometimes fell in short supply and was not administratively efficient
The US system engendered defensive professional/medical practices
Why is blood wasted?
Excessive orders for blood
Unnecessary surgeries/procedures
Outdating
Inefficiency (excess in one location/shortage in another)
How do people become ‘blood indigent’, i.e. in blood debt?
In the US, the consumer pays for blood. Who pays in the UK? In Canada?
How does policy (paid or remunerated vs. unpaid or non-remunerated) affect those with certain diseases?
e.g. Can the VNRBD or ‘gift’ system provide enough clotting factor for hemophiliacs?
UK/Canada public health system pays so patient doesn’t pay for blood unlike US
Chain of selling the blood product:
Donors → blood bank → hospital → patients
How does a gift (unpaid donation) vs. product (paid donation) change people’s motivation?
Is a commercial system corrosive to the ‘spirit’ of giving and supporting a community in an anonymous way? Does it erode the sense of responsibility to the community? Does it diminish altruism and keep people from donating?
“There is nothing permanent about the expression of reciprocity” (page 264)
Would altruism be lost if blood was donated for $?
How do these symptoms impact chronically ill patients needing constant blood donations: quality over quantity don’t want to risk patients’ health – infection
e.g. hemopheliacs need blood clotting factors from plasma, does voluntary system meet need?
-Gift creates social bonds + trust, product is transactional
Why would hemophiliacs experience a sense of burden, guilt, and be considered uninsurable? (page 272)
guilt bc relying on donated blood, fear of being uninsurable, marginalization as burden on system when volunteer
Why could the commercial blood system be said to “maximise diswelfares”? (page 265)
max diswelfare = policies that increase suffering
What is the “Paretian myth of consumer sovereignty”?
false belief that consumers always benefit in free market
Is there such a thing as a “biological need to help”?
bio need to help = ties into psychology, public health, anthropology
Why do people give blood?
Intrinsic motivation or internal reward
Extrinsic motivation or external reward
From ‘The Gift Relationship’
Altruism
Duty
Rare – valuable blod type or factor
General appeal (marketing, advocacy)
Sense of worth/belonging
Reciprocity
Other?
blood donation motivators vs deterrents
Motivators
Altruism
Reciprocity
Values, morals, religion
Social norms
Self esteem
Perceived need
Convenience
Marketing
Incentives
Deterrents
Low efficacy
Lack of involvement
Values, morals, religion
Fear
Negative experience
Lack of knowledge
Inconvenience
Lack of marketing
Ineffective incentives
misinformation about blood donation e.g. might not have enough blood and after donate will have health issues like anemia or trauma after blood donation
No single factor enough, complex mix of factors
The WHO has recommended that all countries should strive toward collecting blood from donors as _________ (VNRBD)
voluntary non-remunerated blood donors
WHO recommends that _% or more of a nation’s population donate blood to meet the demand
1%
General trends in blood donation levels by country (n = 144)
Note the trendlines (GNI = gross national income)
General trends in transfusion transmitted infections (n = 45)
Note the trendlines
-TTI: HIV, hepatitis B/C, syphilis
-income level stronger determinant than voluntary for tti safety
-voluntary must be supported by training, and safety measures
Only ___/124 member states of WHO are meeting the recommendation to rely solely on VNRBD by 2020
62
In many countries (even with financial compensation) the donation rate is <1% even with remuneration (Canada donation rate is around __%, though about 50% are eligible!)
2%
About ___% of 7160 donors from eight studies named monetary incentives a reason for their donation
19%
Meta-analysis and comprehensive reviews largely find higher infection rates in donations from remunerated donors
Attracting non-remunerated donors key
convenience