Week 13 - Moral Judgement Flashcards

(54 cards)

1
Q

Morality

A

fairness - rights, equality, justice
others welfare - care and abstaining from harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

moral development

A

how children construct knowledge about the rules that govern how we ought to treat each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

moral judgement

A

deciding whether an action is morally right or wrong

is it okay to hit someone?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

moral reasoning

A

justification for ones moral decisions

why is it not okay to hit someone?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

moral emotions

A

emotions that reflect internalized moral principles

how do i feel after i hit someone?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

moral behaviours

A

actions consistent with moral principles

how am i going to treat this person?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

moral identity

A

the importance of being a moral person to ones identity

am i a kind person?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

conscience

A

moral compass

internal regulatory mechanism which tries to guide a person to behave in accord with their internalized moral norms

how do i make sure that i am leading my life in a way that is morally good?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

facets of morality

A

emotion: how do i feel about this
cognition: is this right or wrong and why
identity: am i a good person
behaviour: how should i treat others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Piagets theory of moral judgement

A

moral rules are products of social interactions and therefore develop over time
discussions and interactions with peers are more important for moral reasoning than interactions with adults

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Piagets method

A

observed children playing games
interviewed children about what
- constitutes a transgression
- the importance of intention
- whether some punishments were fair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

interview method

A

scenarios where there is a transgression without intention - accidents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

piaget - two stages of morality

A

heteronomous morality - acting in accordance with ones desires rather than reason or moral duty

transitional period

autonomous morality - acting in accordance with ones moral duty rather than ones desires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

stages of heteronomous morality

A

younger than 7 years - preoperational stage (see world through own perspective)
children see rules and obedience to authority just as they do concrete objects in the world
dont consider motives or intentions
justice = is the action consistent with the wants of authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

transitional period

A

7 or 8-10 years
appraoching concrete operations = reason logically, better at perspectives, no systematic testing
through peer interactions - learn to cooperate, negotiate and construct rules - leads to more value to fairness and equality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

stage of autonomous morality

A

11-12
no longer blindly obedient to authority - formal operations - abstract thought
rules based on social agreement - can be changed
consider intentions, punishment should fit the crime
most children achieve stage - depends on opportunities with peers, cognitive maturity, how punitive or authoritarian their parents are

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

support for piagets theory

A

children increasingly take morals into account
parental punitiveness negatively related to moral development
perspective taking, logical skills, IQ associated with moral judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

criticisms of piagets theory

A

peer interaction doesnt automatically stimulate moral development - quality, not quantity
when intentions are made more obvious children consider them earlier - 4-5
young children arent so blind to authority - dont think harming is right when adults say

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

kohlberg’s theory of moral reasoning

A

built upon piagets theory
how we reason about morality is key
6 hierarchial stages - 3 levels
- progressively less self centred
- progressively less reliant on external authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

heinz dilemme

A

woman near death, one drug to save her
drug too expensive
broke into store to steal drug

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

preconventional level

A

justification for behaviour is based on desire to avoid punishment and gain rewards
stage 1 - avoid punishment - punishment and obedience orientation
stage 2 - seek rewards - instrumental and exchange orientation - tit for tat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

conventional level

A

moral judgement centred on social relationshisps with a motive to conform to either get approval from others or follow societies rules

stage 3 - conform to get approval - expectations, relationships, conformity
stage 4 - confirm with society’s rules, laws, conventions such as duty to family, vows, the country - social system and conscience orientation - law and order

23
Q

post-conventional level

A

judgements are controlled by an internalized ethical code that is relatively indepdent of the approval or disapproval of others

stage 5: morality is based on societys consensus about human rights - social contract or individual rights
stage 6: morality is based on abstract principles of justice and equality - universal ethical principles

24
Q

kohlberg reasoning over the lifespan

A

followed 58 boys into adulthood - moral reasoning changes systematically with age

only a few achieved stage 5 and nobody reached stage 6

peaks
stage 2: age 10
stage 3: age 16
stage 4: adulthood

25
heinz dilemma results
6yo - its wrong 9yo - should steal it
26
critique of kohlbergs theory
moral reasoning as discontinuous - people move in and out of moral orders sample only consisted of male participants - women value principle of care unreliable coding system for categorizing reasoning - did not differentiate moral from social conventional issues well cross culture generalizability? some issues like group cohesion are more important in some cultures
27
social domain theory
three domains of social knowledge moral - justice, fairness, equality, rights, welfare of others, not harming others societal domain - conventions, traditions, rituals psychological domain - autonomy, individual choice and preference, physical/health consequences to the self
28
criteria for differentiation of rules
authority jurisdiction - what if teacher says its okay? punishment avoidance - what if you dont get in trouble? rule contigency - what if there is no rule about it? moral domain - rules still stand regardless of differentiation social domain - fluid
29
reasons and justifications - moral
fairness - its not fair if he doesnt get a turn equal treatment - they should be treated the same others' welfare - he'll be hurt and cry and that's wrong
30
reasons and justifications - social conventional
traditions - it's always been done that way before customs/authority - thats how my school does it group regulations - if youre not quiet nobody learns
31
reasons and justifications - psychological
personal choice - she decides cause shes free to do so
32
childrens use of social judgement
differentiate between social and moral issues at age 3 view moral transgressions as more serious offences - low SES children less likely than middle SES - aggressive children confsuse moral and social conventional domains believe parents have no authority over personal judgement
33
social domain theory - judgements about complex issues
conflict between rules in different domains might lead to ambiguities and uncertainties - disobeying a parent to help someone social exclusion is unique - children consider norms, identity, traditions as a basis for exclusion - adolescents think its okay to exclude when identity of group is preserved apply range of reasons from different domains, make decisions based on age and experience
34
how children learn the rules and distinguish between social domains
parents and teachers roles - moral judgements/reasoning advances when parents inititate discussions about other people's feelings - emotional responses of others - breaking moral rules > anger compared to breaking conventional rules
35
timing of parents and teachers roles
effectiveness of socialization depends on how well the message fits the child's developmental level and timing of discussion - 1 yr - physical interventions - 2 yr - verbal brief explanations - 3 yr - rationalize about behaviour - early-late childhood - introduce abstract concepts - fairnesss, care should wait until child is calm to discuss
36
teacher specific roles
learn from classroom values and reasoning when rules are broken children view teachers' authority as limited to rules at school
37
moral emotions
emotions that reflect moral principles vary by valence and orientation affective and cognitive components underlie our values, beliefs, and goals
38
valence and orientation
orientation - self/other valence - positive/negative pride - positive self respect - positive other guilt - negative self sympathy - negative other
39
empathy
shared emotional response that parallel's other's feelings a capacity - panaffective affective empathy (feeling) and cognitive empathy (understanding)
40
development of empathy in infancy and toddlerhood
emotion contagion - newborn - rudimentary empathtic responding - share affect w/o understanding egocentric empathic concern - age 1 - catch emotion and consoles self quasi-egocentric empathic concern - 14-24mo - help in way they would want to be helped verdical empathic concern - 24mo onward - feel and understand, help more adaptively
41
sympathy
feeling of concern for another more morally relevant than empathy - empathy can lead to personal distress: overwhelming feeling of concern for another that inhibits ability to help increases in sympathy ages 5-7 - peer interaction, seperation of self, more understanding
42
compassion
suffering with another and a desire to help - a bit deeper than sympathy involves tolerance and non-judgement
43
guilt
feeling of regret after wrongdoing - behaviour precursors of guilt in first two years of life moral guilt: increases from 4-6 years happy victimizer phenomenon: children may not feel guilt over wrongdoing as they may focus on the gains
44
happy victimizer findings
50% of 3-4yo report feeling happy in response to hypothetically victimizing another 10% of 8yo feel the same way this is despite understanding that what they did was wrong, the other child will feel bad, and they would feel bad if someone did this to them
45
shame
feeling of regret the individual directs at the self related to status, reputation maladaptive - related to depression - not in all cultures
46
pride
feeling pleased with ones accomplishments succeeding on a difficult task elicits pride 7yo - use word proud to reflect good outcomes regardless of whether they succeeded through own efforts 10yo - only own efforts
47
moral pride
positive feelings about the self after acting in accordance with ethical principles moral pride -> prosocial behaviour intrinsically rewarding and encourages future actions increases in moral pride from early-late childhood
48
two types of moral pride
authentic pride - relate to genuine self esteem and linked to more favourable outcomes - proud because its the right thing to do hubristic pride - related to narcissism and one's global self concept - thinking one is a good person
49
jealousy
immoral emotion competition between resources relationships -> jealousy objects/achievements -> envy as early as age 1 express jealousy when mother directs atttention away from them younger children show jealousy with expressions of distress, older children with anger and sadness
50
schadenfreude
immoral emotion feeling joy at anothers misfortune as young as 4 in contexts that involve a peer with immoral intentions suffering a harm - deservingness when an envied suffers misfortune - upward social comparison turns into downward social comparison in competitive contexts when opponent loses
51
antecedents of moral emotions
parental factors that predict moral development mother-infant synchrony - empathy responsiveness to childrens stress (parental sensitivity) - empathy involvement and closeness, support - sympathy, moral reasoning
52
martin hoffman's theory of inductive discipline
three main disciplinary techniques power assertion, love withdrawal, induction
53
why might induction not always work?
efficacy of discipline moderated by several factors - children need to be able to accurately interpret parental messages - more likely to comply with messages that are reasonable, non-threatening - timing is important
54
measuring moral emotions
vignette approach - scenario where child accidentally breaks an adults tower, adult feigns harm - coders rate childs responses how would you feel if you did X? how strongly would you feel X? why would you feel X?