Week 14-15: STRATEGY ANALYSIS AND CHOICE Flashcards

(37 cards)

1
Q

____________ never consider all feasible alternatives that could benefit the firm because there are an infinite number of possible actions and an infinite number of ways to implement those actions.

A

Strategists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Therefore, a manageable set of the most attractive alternative strategies must be developed.

The advantages, disadvantages, trade-offs, costs, and benefits of these strategies should be determined.

A

Strategists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

_______________ from each department and division of the firm should be included in this process, as was the case in previous strategy-formulation activities.

A

Representatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Recall that involvement provides the best opportunity for managers and employees to gain an understanding of what the firm is doing and why and to become committed to helping the firm accomplish its objectives.

A

Representatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Alternative strategies proposed by participants should be considered and discussed in a meeting or series of meetings. Proposed strategies should be listed in writing.

When all feasible strategies identified by participants are given and understood, the strategies should be ranked in order of attractiveness by all participants,

1 = should not be implemented
2 = possibly should be implemented
3 = probably should be implemented
4 = definitely should be implemented

A

Representatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Alternative strategies proposed by participants should be considered and discussed in a meeting or series of meetings. Proposed strategies should be listed in writing. When all feasible strategies identified by participants are given and understood, the strategies should be ranked in order of attractiveness by all participants,

1 = should________________
2 = possibly______________
3 = probably _____________
4 = _______________________

A
  1. not be implemented
  2. should be implemented
  3. should be implemented
  4. definitely should be implemented
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

THE STRATEGY-FORMULATION ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK

Stage ___ of the formulation framework consists of the EFE Matrix, the IFE Matrix, and the Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM). Called the __________, Stage 1 summarizes the basic input information needed to formulate strategies.

A

1

Input Stage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

THE STRATEGY-FORMULATION ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK

Stage __, called the ___________, focuses upon generating feasible alternative strategies by aligning key external and internal factors.

techniques include the Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) Matrix, the Strategic Position and Action Evaluation (SPACE) Matrix, the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix, the Internal-External (IE) Matrix, and the Grand Strategy Matrix.

A

2
Matching Stage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

THE STRATEGY-FORMULATION ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK

Stage __, called the ____________, involves a single technique, the Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM).

A QSPM uses input information from Stage 1 to objectively evaluate feasible alternative strategies identified in Stage 2.

A

3

Decision Stage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

THE STRATEGY-FORMULATION ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK

A ________reveals the relative attractiveness of alternative strategies and thus provides an objective basis for selecting specific strategies.

A

QSPM or Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

is an important matching tool that helps managers develop four types of strategies:

A

The Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) Matrix i

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Matching key external and internal factors is the most difficult part of developing a SWOT Matrix and requires good judgment—and there is no one best set of matches.

A

SO (strengths-opportunities) Strategies,

WO (weaknesses-opportunities) Strategies,

ST (strengths-threats) Strategies, and

WT (weaknesses-threats) Strategies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

________________ use a firm’s internal strengths to take advantage of external opportunities.

All managers would like their organizations to be in a position in which internal strengths can be used to take advantage of external trends and events.

A

SO Strategies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

_________________ aim at improving internal weaknesses by taking advantage of external opportunities.

Sometimes key external opportunities exist, but a firm has internal weaknesses that prevent it from exploiting those opportunities.

For example, there may be a high demand for electronic devices to control the amount and timing of fuel injection in automobile engines (opportunity), but a certain auto parts manufacturer may lack the technology required for producing these devices (weakness).

A

WO Strategies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

____________ use a firm’s strengths to avoid or reduce the impact of
external threats.

This does not mean that a strong organization should always meet threats in the external environment head-on.

An example of ST Strategy occurred when Texas Instruments used an excellent legal department (a strength) to collect nearly $700 million in damages and royalties from nine Japanese and Korean firms that infringed on patents for semiconductor memory chips (threat).

A

ST Strategies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

______________ are defensive tactics directed at reducing internal weakness and avoiding external threats.

An organization faced with numerous external threats and internal weaknesses may indeed be in a precarious position.

In fact, such a firm may have to fight for its survival, merge, retrench, declare bankruptcy, or choose liquidation.

A

WT Strategies

17
Q

Another important Stage 2 matching tool.

Its four-quadrant framework indicates whether aggressive, conservative, defensive, or competitive strategies are most appropriate for a given organization.

A

The Strategic Position and Action Evaluation (SPACE) Matrix

18
Q

The axes of the ____________ represent two internal dimensions (financial position [FP] and competitive position [CP]) and two external dimensions (stability position [SP] and industry position [IP]).

A

The Strategic Position and Action Evaluation (SPACE) Matrix

19
Q

numerous variables could make up each of the dimensions represented on the axes of the _____________.

Factors that were included earlier in the firm’s EFE and IFE Matrices should be considered in developing a _____________.

For example, return on investment, leverage, liquidity, working capital, and cash flow are commonly considered to be determining factors of an organization’s financial strength.

Like the SWOT Matrix, the _________________ should be both tailored to the particular organization being studied and based on factual information as much as possible.

A

The Strategic Position and Action Evaluation (SPACE) Matrix

20
Q

The steps required to develop a SPACE Matrix are as follows:

  1. Select a _____________ to define financial position (FP), competitive position (CP), stability position (SP), and industry position (IP).
A

set of variables

21
Q

The steps required to develop a SPACE Matrix are as follows:

  1. Assign a numerical value ranging from +1 (worst) to +7 (best) to each of the variables that make up the _____ and ___________________.

Assign a numerical value ranging from -1(best) to -7 (worst) to each of the variables that make up the _____ and __________________.

On the _____________ axes, make comparison to competitors.

On the ______________ axes, make comparison to other industries.

A

FB and IP dimensions

SP and CP dimensions.

FP and CP

IP and SP

22
Q

The steps required to develop a SPACE Matrix are as follows:

  1. Compute an ______________ for FP, CP, IP, and SP by summing the values given to the variables of each dimension and then by dividing by the number of variables included in the respective dimension.
A

average score

23
Q

The steps required to develop a SPACE Matrix are as follows:

  1. _____ the average scores for FP, IP, SP, and CP on the appropriate axis in the SPACE MATRIX.
24
Q

The steps required to develop a SPACE Matrix are as follows:

  1. Add the ___________ on the x-axis and plot the restaurant point on X. Add the two scores on the y-axis and plot the restaurant point on Y. Plot the intersection of the new xy point.
25
6. ___________ a directional vector reveals the type of strategies recommended for the organization: aggressive, competitive, defensive, or conservative.
Draw
26
Other than ranking strategies to achieve the prioritized list, there is only one analytical technique in the literature designed to determine the relative attractiveness of feasible alternative actions. which comprises Stage 3 of the strategy-formulation analytical framework. This technique objectively indicates which alternative strategies are best.
Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM)
27
The ________ uses input from Stage 1 analyses and matching results from Stage 2 analyses to decide objectively among alternative strategies. That is, the EFE Matrix, IFE Matrix, and Competitive Profile Matrix that make up Stage 1, coupled with the SWOT Matrix, SPACE Matrix, BCG Matrix, IE Matrix, and Grand Strategy Matrix that make up Stage 2, provide the needed information for setting up the QSPM (Stage 3). The ______ is a tool that allows strategists to evaluate alternative strategies objectively, based on previously identified external and internal critical success factors. Like other strategy-formulation analytical tools, the QSPM requires good intuitive judgment.
QSPM
28
The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) Step ___ Make a list of the firm’s key external opportunities/threats and internal strengths/weaknesses in the left column of the QSPM. This information should be taken directly from the __________________. A minimum of 10 external key success factors and 10 internal key success factors should be included in the QSPM.
1 EFE Matrix and IFE Matrix
29
The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) Step __ Assign weights to each key external and internal factor. These weights are identical to those in the EFE Matrix and the IFE Matrix. The weights are presented in a ________ column just to the right of the external and internal critical success factors.
2 straight
30
The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) Step 3 Examine the Stage 2 (matching) matrices, and identify alternative strategies that the organization should consider implementing. Record these strategies in the ____row of the QSPM. _______ the strategies into mutually exclusive sets if possible.
top Group
31
The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) Step 3 ___________ the Stage 2 (matching) matrices, and identify alternative strategies that the organization should consider implementing. Record these strategies in the top row of the QSPM. Group the strategies into mutually exclusive sets if possible.
Examine
32
The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) Step 4 Determine the _______________________ (AS) defined as numerical values that indicate the relative attractiveness of each strategy in a given set of alternatives. Attractiveness Scores (AS) are determined by examining each key external or internal factor, one at a time, and asking the question “Does this factor affect the choice of strategies being made?” If the answer to this question is yes, then the strategies should be compared relative to that key factor. Specifically, Attractiveness Scores should be assigned to each strategy to indicate the relative attractiveness of one strategy over others, considering the particular factor. The range for Attractiveness Scores is 1 = not attractive, 2 = somewhat attractive, 3 = reasonably attractive, and 4 = highly attractive.
Attractiveness Scores
33
The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) STEP ___: By attractive, we mean the extent that one strategy, compared to others, enables the firm to either capitalize on the strength, improve on the weakness, exploit the opportunity, or avoid the threat. Work row by row in developing a QSPM. If the answer to the previous question is no, indicating that the respective key factor has no effect upon the specific choice being made, then do not assign Attractiveness Scores to the strategies in that set. Use a dash to indicate that the key factor does not affect the choice being made. Note: If you assign an AS score to one strategy, then assign AS score(s) to the other. In other words, if one strategy receives a dash, then all others must receive a dash in a given row.
4
34
The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) Step 5 Compute the _______________________. Total Attractiveness Scores (TAS) are defined as the product of multiplying the weights (Step 2) by the Attractiveness Scores (Step 4) in each row. The Total Attractiveness Scores indicate the relative attractiveness of each alternative strategy, considering only the impact of the adjacent external or internal critical success factor. The higher the Total Attractiveness Score, the more attractive the strategic alternative (considering only the adjacent critical success factor).
Total Attractiveness Scores
35
The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) Step 6 Compute the Sum Total Attractiveness Score. Add Total Attractiveness Scores in each strategy column of the QSPM. The ____________________________ reveal which strategy is most attractive in each set of alternatives. Higher scores indicate more attractive strategies, considering all the relevant external and internal factors that could affect the strategic decisions. The magnitude of the difference between the Sum Total Attractiveness Scores in a given set of strategic alternatives indicates the relative desirability of one strategy over another.
Sum Total Attractiveness Scores (STAS)
36
are defined as the product of multiplying the weights (Step 2) by the Attractiveness Scores (Step 4) in each row.
Total Attractiveness Scores (TAS)
37
indicate the relative attractiveness of each alternative strategy, considering only the impact of the adjacent external or internal critical success factor.
The Total Attractiveness Scores