Week 14, Leadership, Slides Flashcards
(42 cards)
Leadership
- The study of Leadership is the investigation of how one individual (labeled a leader) influences a second individual, or group of individuals (Yukl & Van Fleet, 1992).
- “There are almost as many definitions of leadership as there are persons who have attempted to define the concept” (Bass, 1990)
- “Literally thousands of empirical investigations of leaders have been conducted in the last seventy-five years alone, but no clear and unequivocal understanding exists as to what distinguishes leaders from nonleaders, and perhaps more important, what distinguishes effective leaders from ineffective leaders.” (Bennis and Nanus, 1985)
The past 40 years
- Considerable strides in our understanding of leadership
- First focused on inherited traits and abilities
- Then the shift moved towards the situation determining the type of leadership we would employ
- Finally the perceptions of the followers seemed to be the driving force
Traits
- Early researchers formulated the great person theory
- Leaders possess key traits that make them different from other people. The key elements are:
** distinguishing traits
** traits are stable over time
** generalizes across groups
** some traits increase the likelihood of success as leader - Galton (1869) - naturally endowed, passed from generation to generation
e.g. Recent Trait Emphasis…
- Adaptability
- Effective change of behavior in response to an altered situation.
- Adaptability requires individuals to seek out problems and develop solutions
- Identified as a requirement for leaders to achieve
organizational goals (Pulakos et al. 2000) - Pulakos identified 7 dimensions
Dimensions of Adaptability
- Emergency or Crisis Situations
- Work Stress
- Problem Solving
- Unpredictable work situations
- Learning new Technology & Procedures
- Interpersonal Adaptability
- Cultural Adaptability
Behavior
- Couldn’t pin down traits, so re-conceptualized the research question
- Examined what leaders did (focus on their behaviors)
- They moved the focus from leaders to leadership
- Patterns of behavior were grouped and labeled as
“styles”
Initiating Structure = Work Hard
Consideration= Be Cool
Situation
- Contingency approach (Fiedler)
- Effective leadership was dependent on a mix of factors
- Two interacting factors
** leadership style
** degree to which the situation gives the leader control - “If A then B” approach to effective leadership
- Static deterministic models (decision trees?) Vroom
- Issues
- North American bias
- Cultural factors influence the way that people carry out, and respond to, different leadership styles
- Some cultures are more individualistic, or value family over bureaucratic models…
- Situation IS NOT OBJECTIVE, perceptions come into play
Cognitive Views
- Examine how individuals acquire, store, retrieve, and use information in order to better understand how they function and adapt to the current context (Lord & Maher, 1991).
- Implicit Leadership Theories (ILT)
- Followers have leadership schemas that guide their perceptions and actions
- These schema play a part in how info is processed
- Leader emergence
Interactionist Approach Image
Image
Contemporary Views of Leadership
Transactional Leadership
Charismatic Leadership
Executive Presence
Transformational Leadership
Transactional Leadership
- Identifies what needs to be done, plans and provides a means of accomplishing the goal, provide feedback
- Uses power derived from reward and punishment to influence (contingent reward)
- In turn follower provides leader with respect and idiosyncratic credit
Charismatic Leadership
Qualities
* Self confidence
* Ability to distill complex ideas into simple messages
* Communicates with symbols, metaphors and stories
* Extraordinary behavior
* Inspires devotion and loyalty
* Inspires excitement for ideas
Executive Presence
- Hot topic, and key driver of executive success (stakeholder engagement)
- Defined as “the ability to master perceptions” (Crittenden, 2013, p.10) - “the ability to exude authenticity, competence, and emotional intelligence” (Long, 2011, p. 14)
- The myriad of definitions have added confusion, not clarity
- The “It Factor”, Aura, Swagger, etc.
Presence
- Presence comes from knowing who you are and being comfortable with it.
- Self Awareness and Self Acceptance.
- Congruence of voice, body, emotions and words.
- Self-Awareness and Authenticity lead to clarity.
- Self-Awareness is the foundation for building presence.
Foundations of Presence Image
Image
Transformational Leadership
- A step beyond charisma & presence
- Inspire major change in attitude/assumption of organizational members
- New data suggests models are not supported (Van Knippenberg & Sitkin, 2013)
- According to Jay Conger (1989; 1998)
** Formulating a vision
** Communicating the vision
** Building trust and motivating followers
** Achieving through empowerment of coworkers
Development of Vision
- Coaching
- SWOT analysis
- Personal Values/ Perspectives
- Strategic Planning & Debrief
- Rinse, repeat…
Transformational Leadership
- Key behaviors:
** Intellectual stimulation
** Individualized consideration
** Inspirational motivation (charisma) - Any drawbacks?
Kellerman (2004) * Leadership Warts and All.”. Harvard Business Review
- “We tell ourselves stories in order to live“
- Explain the unfounded optimism of humanity
- Good stories make the world more bearable…even if that means that we don’t get as complete a picture as we need
Kellerman (2004)
- Suggests we are too focused on feel good stories
- When “flawed leaders are everywhere”
- Discusses how the notion of leadership has changed to
reflect American optimism - Machiavelli
- James MacGregor Burns
- Scholars should remind us that leadership is not a moral concept
- Knowing that, we can begin to explore the more interesting questions of leadership:
** Why do leaders behave badly?
** Why do followers follow bad leaders?
** How can bad leadership be slowed or even stopped?
** Is it possible to have the good side of leadership without the bad?
Dark Side of Leadership…
- Dark side of leadership (Conger, 1990).
- Derailed leaders (Shackleton, 1995).
- Intolerable bosses (Lombardo & McCall, 1984).
- Health endangering leaders (Kile, 1990).
- Abusive supervision (Bies & Tripp, 1998; Tepper, 2000).
- Toxic leadership (Lubit, 2004).
- Managerial tyranny (Ma, Karri & Chittipeddi, 2004).
- Petty Tyranny (Ashforth, 1994).
Negative Leadership?
- Ashforth (1994)
- Most organizational research has focused on the factors associated with effective leadership
- The assumption is that ineffective leadership reflects the absence of those factors (Hogan (2004) suggests otherwise)
- Forms of ineffective leadership may have their own characteristics
- “Petty tyranny“
Petty Tyranny
- Distrust and suspicion
- Severe and public criticism of others’ character and behavior
- Condescending and patronizing behavior, emotional outbursts
- Coercion
- Arbitrary decisions
- Takes credit for the efforts of others and blames them for mistakes
- Joint function of certain individual predispositions and situational facilitators
Individual Difference Factors
- Bureaucratic orientation
** domineering, impersonal, inflexible, and insists upon the rights of authority and status
** bureaucratically-oriented individuals tend to be somewhat insecure, suspicious, authoritarian, dogmatic, and lower in ability - Low Self Confidence
** less likely to expect “persuasion and other gentle means of influence” to be effective
** More willing to enforce their will through coercive means
** high self-esteem may occasionally contribute to tyrannical behavior (narcissism) - Preference for Action
** tendency to impose one’s will on others