Week 2 Flashcards
(45 cards)
Medical pluralism
Popular sector
This is the lay, non-professional, non-specialist domain of society,
where ill health is first recognized and defined and health-care
activities are initiated. It includes all the therapeutic options that
people use, without any payment and without consulting either folk
healers or medical” - Self-treatment, self- medication, advice from
relatives, friends, colleagues, neighbors… (Page 82)
Folk Sector:
- “… certain individuals specialize in forms of healing that are either
sacred or secular, or a mixture of the two. These healers are not
part of the official medical system and occupy an intermediate
position between the popular and professional sectors.” (Page 84) - Examples sometimes of these are midwives, herbalists, found in Nepal, faith healers, shamans which are
sangomas, inyangas, etc.
Professional sector
“This comprises the organized, legally sanctioned healing
professions, such as modern Western scientific medicine, also
known as allopathy or biomedicine. It includes not only physicians of
various types and specialties, but also the recognized paramedical
professions such as nurses, midwives and physiotherapists.” pg94
Popular Sector:
- Hierarchy of resort
- Lay understandings of the body and how it works
- Feminisation of care
- Sharing of medication
- Making of remedies
- Food as healing
- Facebook groups
- Beliefs about prevention
- Shared beliefs about prevention, illness and * Experience as the best teacher
- Undermined by biomedical practitioners
Folk Sector:
- Shared cultural values and worldview
- Holistic care
- Beyond the body, relationships, environment, etc.
- Involvement of famity in treatment and care
- Unregulated
- No ‘formal’ training but apprenticeship
- Undermined by biomedical practitioners (scammers, threat to proper treatment, danger, etc)
- Attempts at formalization
Professional Sector:
- Dominant system of health care
- Organised, upheld by law, accepted
- Higher social status
- Western origins
- Not always accessible * Male dominated
- Isolated/isolating
- In crisis
Medical Pluralism & Half Stories:
- Insufficient biomedical healthcare access
- Lack of economic resources
- Support of Indigenous/traditional medicine by governments
- Use of alternative medical traditions by biomedicine practitioners:
mistrust
-Medical - Regional - Historical considerations
- Etiology
Biomedicine
- Often informed but a mind-body separation
- No allowance for chance/ misfortune
- Treats the body as a natural universal scientific entity-reductionist
- Internalizing discourse - ..Focused primarily named entities such as viruses, genes, biomarkers, or other signs Internal to the body, pg60
vs
Other Medical Traditions
Does not assume a universal body
Externalising discourse - “locate the origins of disease largely
outside of the human body and include references to human social
relationships, the environment, and the spiritual or cosmic order* pg 60
Takeaway from Lecture 1: WEEK 2.
- There are many medical traditions.
- The three sectors are not ‘gospel.
- Need to understand medical cultural-economic context.
decisions within a socio-political, - Disconnect between how people understand they need and the biomedical understanding their of bodies and what
the body. - Medical decisions are not divorced from experiences of gender, race,
and place - they are made in context.
R1: The Context
set in “the Park”
R1: TB burden:
Highest global rates of TB and MDRTB
R1: Environment-related illness:
Inadequate housing
Insufficient water
Lack of sanitation
R1: Work-related illness:
Accidents
Pesticide poisoning - farm workers
R1: Poverty-related illness:
sickness Malnutrition
induced by poverty.
Anxiety (Lots of stress in the environment)
High Blood Pressure (High Blood)
Diabetes (suiker)
Alcohol abuse and dependence (legacy of the dop system - farmers
were payed with alcohol and not money)
Violence
R1: Fiona Ross draws from Hellmans concept of: Time Poor & Time Rich
“Between 2001 and 2003, more than thirty of the eight hundred people living
in The Village died,3 mainly of diseases related to poverty, including TB, and
diseases compounded by HIV seropositivity, and of violence. Very few have
lived long enough to die a death not associated with illness or violence - to
die ‘of old age’ (ouderdom) as it was locally known. In dry, sociological terms,
the number of dead accounted for almost four percent of the population over 2 years
R1: Were born sick. Newborns come into this world sick and stay that way
example- baby shower they bring medicine as gift
People that live in the Park understand the context that they live in. Ilness is a social disease. There are very clear health disparities that health settles
R1:Understanding the Body & Medical Pluralism:
The Body is Vulnerable to external and internal agents in The Park:
Internal (germs, working conditions, etc)
External (excess heat, jelousy, passion, emotions)
Sometimes both
- Medications/solutions
The solutions are different to this illness because the context in which
they live in the Park is different.
Biomedical
Social (Rastafari as calming influences and mediators in society - they are people that can bring peace
Sometimes both
R1: Local Models of the Body and Illness:
- Alcohol is used as anti-stress - Smoking zol whilst in the ARV medication
trial - Rastafari belives in zol
Hypertensive = impending death - Lack of adherence
- Sharing of prescription drugs
- No access to fruits
- Questions and beliefs about contagion and efficacy od mediactions “vet TB (fat TB) “maer Tb” “mooi tb” “lelik tb” “vinnig or gallop tb” and “touched by tb”
Example made: The visitor who fell - random lady , they thought she was mad, possessed or had epilepsy when she fell.
R1: Insights from Medical Anthropology in The Park:
NB- This example is interesting because it shoes the overlap of all the
different models and beliefs of the body and health of people who all
live in the same context.
* Must be able to see how ill health affect’s people differently and it
looks different to everyone. The way disease settles is different in
different contexts bc of inequality and poverty.
* The forms as out sociality made illness possible:
* Friendships are built around illness, taking h medication together,
lifts to the clicking together for TB treatment. It builds relationship.
* Denies friends too - nobody wants to hang out with someone in
the ugly stage of TB
* Inequality and poverty = Chronic disease and premature death
* Forms of sociality that illness makes possible or denies
* Impact of illness on individual and their relationships
* Local discourses on health
* Biomedical model as authoritative knowledge
* Biomedicine is localized
* Diagnosis as a social process
“Unlike the standard analytic model that, as I described earlier, sets
‘local’ knowledge in opposition to a universalistic biomedical
knowledge, biomedicine is but one of a range of possible ‘local’
ways of understanding and interpreting affliction. What
distinguishes biomedicine from other regimes is that the implicated in the provision of care.”
Reading 4
Summary of: ‘Sincedisa – we I
can help!’ A Literature Review
of Current Practice Involving Traditional African Healers in Biomedical
HIV/AIDS Interventions in South Africa. - Wreford, J.
reading 4 overview
This literature review explores how traditional African healers—who hold
longstanding cultural authority in many South African communities—are
being included (or excluded) in HIV/AIDS interventions alongside the
biomedical system. It’s a rich study in medical pluralism, colonial legacies,
and power relations in health care.
R4: Key Anthropological Themes
- Medical Pluralism
& Cultural Authority
In South Africa, many people consult both biomedical professionals and
traditional healers (known as sangomas, inyangas, etc.).
Traditional healers aren’t just “alternative” practitioners—they are spiritual
guides, community therapists, and cultural custodians.
They often serve as the first point of contact for health issues, including HIV/AIDS - Epistemological Conflicts
Biomedical institutions often dismiss traditional healing as unscientific or even dangerous, especially in the context of HIV/AIDS.
This reflects a deeper epistemological divide: biomedicine privileges
empirical, testable knowledge, while traditional healing is embedded in
spiritual, ancestral, and communal knowledge systems. - Colonial & Postcolonial Legacies
Under colonial and apartheid rule, criminalized.
traditional healers were marginalized and
Although post-apartheid policies now officially recognize them, real inclusion
in public health strategies remains limited.
The legacy of colonial medicine as the dominant knowledge system
continues to shape these dynamics. - HIV/AIDS & Collaboration Models
biomedically
The review finds that collaborations do exist, but they’re often driven and hierarchical.
Healers are sometimes trained to recognize symptoms and refer patients to
clinics—but aren’t treated as equal partners.
In some cases, they are co-opted into the biomedical system rather respected for their own knowledge base.
Successful models involve mutual respect, dialogue, and acknowledgemnt of healers’ cultural legitimacy. - Healers’ Perspectives
Many healers want to collaborate, not to replace biomedicine but to work alongside it.
They express frustration at being treated with suspicion and not being heard, despite
their close community ties.
R4: Implications for social anth
This literature invites anthropologists to critically examine how knowledge
systems interact, especially under global health regimes.
It shows the need for culturally sensitive and inclusive health policies that don’t just “tolerate” traditional systems but engange them as equals.
It challenges simplistic binaries like modern/traditional or scientific or superstitious
Most importantly, it underscores how power operates in health- determining whose knowledge counts, whose practices are legitimate and who gets to shape interventions
Reading 5:
Caring and Curing: The Sectors of Health Care
Hellman C