Week 2 - Language Flashcards

(24 cards)

1
Q

Localisation of language

Core cortical regions

Anatomical areas

A
  • Broca’s area = inferior frontal gyrus
  • Wernicke’s area = superior temporal gyrus
  • Surrounding gyri = ventral parts of pre-postcentral gyri, supramarginal gyrus, angular gyrus, medial temporal gyrus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Language areas within the lateral fissure (planum temporale)

Anatomical areas

A
  • Insula
  • Hschl’s gyrus (primary auditory cortex)
  • STP (superior temporal planes)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Localisation of language

Additional areas

Anatomical areas

A
  • Dorsal premotor area
  • Visual areas (reading)
  • Parietal cortex
  • Cerebellum, thalamus, basal ganglia (coordination).
  • Right hemisphere (prosody, contex and discourse)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Localisation of language

Wernicke-Geschwind model

Neural connections betweeen language zones

A

Classical model of speech comprehension and production

Proposes that comprehension is:
1. Extracted from sounds in wernicke’s area.
2. Passed over the arcuate fasciulus pathway
3. Then goes to broca’s area to be articulated as speech.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Localisation of language

The dual language pathways

Neural connections betweeen language zones

A

Dorsal pathway:
* Phonological = motor mapping.
* Bottom-up (sounds -> articulation)
* Used for repeating sounds/words
* Damage = impaired repetition and articulation.

Ventral pathway:
* Semantic = meaning mapping.
* Top-down (meaning -> word assignment)
* Used for understanding complex grammar, assigning meanin.
* Damage = can read/produce speech but cannot understand meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Localisation of language

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Speech zones mapped by brain imaging techniques

Why use it, how it works, limitations

A

Why use it: non-invasive technique to explore language function in healthy individuals.

How it works:
* Produces a “virtual lesion” by disrupting neural function temporarily (effects last from milliseconds to an hour).
* It can interfere with or enahnce reaction times.
* It can be combiend with MRI to target specific regions.
* It can be repeated easily in experimental setups.

Limitations:
* Auditory noise = may induce distractions
* Stimuls passes through scalp and skull = may cause discomfort or contractions.
* Limited access to deep brian structures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Localisation of language

Key findings

Speech zones mapped by brain imaging techniques

A
  • Auditory and visual word processing occur independently.
  • Broca’s area involved in speech production and syntax/verb generation.
  • Wernicke’s area handles auditory input decoding and likelymore than just speech comprehension.
  • Word meaning appears mapped to object-related areas = visual features in visual regions and motor features in motor areas.
  • It reinforces the idea that language is grounded in broader sensory-motor systems.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Localisation of language

Core language network

Neural networks for language

A

Structure = 5 functional modules, each with a role:
1. High-level language regions (syntax, semantics).
2. Speech perception areas
3. Word-form recognition areas
4. Articulation areas
5. Cognitive control areas

Function:
* Single modules can support simple tasts (ex: speech perception).
* Multiple modules co-activate for complex tasks (ex: discourse)
* Language is supported by modular and dynamic cooperation of specialised subsystems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Localisation of language

Nodes and neural webs for language

Neural networks for language

A

Brain constructs “neural webs” to represent words.

A web consists of:
* Nodes = functional units (ex: auditory, motor, visual).
* Edges = pathways connecting nodes.

Each word activates a unique web based on its semantic properties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Language disorders

History vs modern

A

Historically = language impairments linked to brain regions like Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas.

Modern = language function is much more complex, involving sensory integration, motor skills, syntax and memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Language disorders

Aphasias

A

Language disorder that affects speech, writing and/or reading, usually due to injury in language-specific brain regions.

Disorders from motor or sensory loss are not aphasias but may co-occur.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Language disorders

Fluent aphasias - general

Fluent aphasias

A
  • Main deficit lies in language input or reception.
  • Speech appears fluent and well-articulated but may lack comprehension or meaning.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Language disorders

Wernicke’s (sensory) aphasia

Fluent aphasias

A

The inability to comprehend or organise words despite fluent speech.

Luria’s 3 characteristics:
1. Sound classification deficit = cannot distinguish nor categorise phonemes and sounds.
2. Speech production deficit = able to speak but confusion on phonetic characteristics which results in WORD SALAD.
3. Writing deficit = unable to write due to phoneme-grapheme disconnection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Language disorders

Transcortical aphasia (isolation syndrome)

Fluent aphasias

A
  • Repetition is intact, but spontaneous speech and comprehension are impaired.
  • May produce meaningful words but lack coherence.
  • Word production is normal.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Language disorders

Conduction aphasia

Fluent aphasias

A
  • Can speak, name objects and understand speech.
  • Cannot repeat due to disrupted connection between perceptual word image and motor systems.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Language disorders

Anomic aphasia (emnesic aphasia)

Fluent aphasias

A
  • Comprehend speech, produce meaningful speech, and can repeat speech but difficulties in naming objects.
  • Struggles specifically with nouns.
  • Related to left temporal cortex damage = areas controlling recognition and classification
17
Q

Language disorders

Broca’s aphasia (expressive aphasia)

Non-fluent aphasias

A
  • Can understand speech but has to labour to produce it.
  • The person speaks in short phrases interspersed with pauses, sound errors, repetitious errors and omitting function words.
  • The deficit is not in making sounds but from switching from one sound to another.
18
Q

Language disorders

Transcrotical motor aphasia

Non-fluent aphasias

A
  • Repetition is good but spontaneous production of speech is laboured.
19
Q

Language disorders

Global apahsia

Non-fluent aphasias

A

Speech is laboured and comprehension is poor

20
Q

Language disorders

Alexia, agraphia and word deafness

Pure aphasias

A
  • Alexia = inability to read
  • Agraphia = inability to write
  • Word deafness = inability to hear or repeat words
21
Q

Language disorders

Key points about the neural basis of language

Localisation of lesions in aphasia

A
  1. Most of the brain participates in language (too complex to be tied to a single, small brian area).
  2. Most lesion data comes from stroke patients (stroke often affects the middle cerebral artery which supplies core language areas but lesion variability complicates conclusions).
  3. Symptoms improve over time (initially severe but improves after, making localisation based on early symptoms misleading).
  4. Aphasia subtypes are varied (they have many symptoms, each possibly linked to distinct neural subtrates).
22
Q

Language disorders

Cortical language components

Localisation of lesions in aphasia

Non-fluent and fluent aphasias

A

Non-Fluent aphasias symptoms linked to:
* Apraxia of speech (motor difficulty) = damage to insula
* Sentence comprehension impairment = damage to temporal gyrus.
* Recurring utterances = damage to arcuate fasciculus.
* Articulatory deficits and working memory = damage to frontal cortex.

Fluent aphasias:
* Typically reflects lack of comprehension = damage to temporal lobe and white matter.
* Suggests language also involves occipital, temporal and parietal regions and that temporal cortex-frontal connectiosn are critical

23
Q

Language disorders

Subcortical language components

Localisation of lesions in aphasia

A

Thalamus plays a role in language:
* Pulvinar and posterior lateral central complex are involved.
* Important subcortical region

24
Q

Language disorders

Hemispheric contributions to language

Localisation of lesions in aphasia

A

Left vs right:
* Left dominates language in most right-handed people.
* Right, althoutl ittle to no speech, contributes more than previously thought = auditory comprehension, some reading ability, recognition of words but little writting ability and understanding of grammar and senstence rules/strucutres.

Right hemisphere can compense if left hemisphere is removed early in life but speech remains limited if removal happens in adulthood.

Conclusion:
* Right hemisphere = language comprehension
* Left hemisphere = language syntax (production, timing, sequencing movements and grammar rules).