Week 3 Flashcards
(184 cards)
Why does the Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) theory fail to explain large short-term exchange rate fluctuations?
PPP assumes exchange rates are driven solely by goods price differences across countries. However, in reality, short-term fluctuations can result from financial market dynamics, capital flows, or speculative activities unrelated to goods prices.
How do money and capital flows challenge the validity of PPP in modern economies?
PPP focuses only on goods prices, neglecting the impact of money and capital flows such as investments in bonds, stocks, and other financial instruments. These flows often play a larger role in driving exchange rates than goods price differences.
Explain how exchange rate expectations undermine the PPP framework using an example.
Exchange rate expectations can lead to immediate currency movements. For instance, if investors expect a currency to depreciate in the future, it may depreciate now as they act on their expectations. PPP does not account for such forward-looking behaviors.
What was the impact of Mario Draghi’s quantitative easing (QE) announcement on the euro, and why does this example highlight the limitations of PPP?
Draghi’s QE announcement increased expectations of future money supply, leading to an immediate depreciation of the euro against the dollar despite the current money supply remaining constant. This demonstrates that expectations, not just goods prices, significantly influence exchange rates.
Discuss how incorporating asset markets into exchange rate models provides a more realistic approach than PPP.
Asset markets incorporate the role of expectations, money supply, and financial instruments in determining exchange rates. Unlike PPP, this approach accounts for the dynamic interactions between currency values and future returns on assets, making it more flexible and realistic.
Why is the carry trade strategy not explained by PPP?
The carry trade exploits interest rate differentials between countries, borrowing in low-interest rate currencies and investing in high-interest rate ones. PPP does not address financial flows or interest rate dynamics, which are central to this strategy.
Provide an example of how capital flows can lead to currency appreciation or depreciation, bypassing the principles of PPP.
If a country experiences a surge in foreign investment due to attractive stock market returns, its currency may appreciate due to higher demand. This appreciation can occur independently of goods price differences, which PPP focuses on.
Why does PPP struggle to explain currency movements in the presence of speculative trading?
Speculative trading is driven by market sentiment and future expectations rather than goods prices. Speculators might buy or sell a currency in anticipation of future policy changes or economic events, causing volatility that PPP cannot account for.
Explain how an increase in the expected future money supply can affect current exchange rates, using the asset approach.
An increase in the expected future money supply can lead to a depreciation of the currency today. Investors anticipate lower future returns on the currency, sell it in the present, and drive its value down, consistent with the asset approach but not PPP.
What are the limitations of using PPP as a long-term exchange rate model when compared to asset-based models?
While PPP might explain long-term trends based on relative price levels, it ignores factors like capital flows, monetary policy, speculative behavior, and expectations, which are crucial in the short to medium term. Asset-based models incorporate these dynamics, providing a more comprehensive explanation.
Why does Uncovered Interest Parity (UIP) require that investors do not hedge exchange rate risk?
UIP assumes that investors rely on their expectations of future exchange rates without using forward contracts or other hedging tools. The lack of hedging introduces exchange rate risk, which is inherent in the “uncovered” nature of foreign investments.
How does speculation in the foreign exchange market help restore UIP when the foreign interest rate exceeds the domestic interest rate (r*>r)?
If r* > r, foreign investments are more attractive. Investors sell domestic currency to buy foreign currency, increasing the supply of the domestic currency in the forex market. This causes the domestic currency to depreciate, reducing the expected future depreciation (Et[s˙]) until UIP is restored.
What are the main conditions required for UIP to hold, and why are they important?
Perfect capital mobility: Investors must freely move capital across borders to exploit interest rate differentials.
Equal currency risk or risk neutrality: Investors must perceive currencies as equally risky or disregard risk entirely. These conditions ensure that interest rate differentials reflect expected exchange rate movements without distortions.
Why might UIP fail in the presence of a risk premium, and how does this affect the formula?
If investors perceive one currency as riskier, they demand a higher return, creating a risk premium. This alters the UIP formula to
r -r* = Et[s˙] + riskpremium, meaning the interest rate differential no longer solely reflects expected exchange rate movements.
Illustrate how UIP explains currency depreciation when a central bank raises foreign interest rates (r*)
When r* increases, foreign investments become more attractive. Investors convert domestic currency into foreign currency, causing the domestic currency to depreciate. This depreciation adjusts Et[s˙] until the interest rate differential matches the expected depreciation, restoring UIP.
Why is perfect capital mobility critical for UIP, and what happens if this condition is not met?
Perfect capital mobility ensures that investors can freely move funds to exploit interest rate differentials. Without it, barriers like capital controls or transaction costs prevent arbitrage, allowing interest rate differences to persist independently of expected exchange rate changes.
How does speculation in the foreign exchange market help restore UIP when r* - r?
When r*-r, foreign investments appear more attractive. Speculators convert domestic currency into foreign currency, increasing the supply of the domestic currency in the forex market. This causes the domestic currency to depreciate (St increases). The expected future depreciation (Et[s˙]) decreases until the interest rate differential matches the adjusted expectation, restoring UIP.
Explain the role of exchange rate expectations (Et[s˙]) in ensuring UIP is restored during speculative activity.
Speculative activity adjusts the current spot exchange rate (St) based on expectations of future exchange rates (Et[St+1]). If investors expect too high a depreciation (Et[s˙]), speculation causes the domestic currency to depreciate until Et[s˙] aligns with the interest rate differential, restoring UIP.
Why does UIP require the condition
r - r* = Et[s˙] to hold, and how does speculation ensure this?
UIP states that the interest rate differential
(r - r*) must equal the expected rate of currency depreciation (Et[s˙]). Speculation drives adjustments in St by increasing or decreasing demand for currencies, ensuring that the spot rate reflects these expectations and satisfies UIP.
What happens to the domestic currency if the expected depreciation (Et[s˙]) is too high compared to the interest rate differential
(r - r*)
If Et[s˙] is too high, foreign investment becomes more attractive, leading to an outflow of capital from the domestic economy. This increases the supply of the domestic currency in the forex market, causing it to depreciate (St rises). As depreciation occurs, Et[s˙] decreases until it aligns with r - r*
How does UIP form the basis of exchange rate theory?
UIP establishes a relationship between interest rate differentials (r - r*) and exchange rate expectations (Et [s˙]). It suggests that the current spot exchange rate (St) depends on the domestic interest rate (r) and market expectations of future spot rates. However, full exchange rate theory requires modeling both r and Et[s˙].
If r* is fixed, what factors primarily determine the current spot exchange rate (St ) under UIP?
If r*is exogenous, St is determined by:
The domestic interest rate (r): Higher r makes domestic currency more attractive, causing appreciation.
Expectations of future exchange rates (Et[s˙]): If depreciation is expected, St adjusts to reflect those expectations.
Describe how UIP explains the depreciation of the domestic currency when domestic interest rates (r) are lowered.
Lower domestic interest rates (r) reduce the return on domestic investments relative to foreign investments (r*). This prompts investors to move capital abroad, increasing the supply of domestic currency in the forex market. As a result, the domestic currency depreciates until UIP is restored.
What role does risk neutrality play in the validity of UIP, and what happens if investors are risk-averse?
UIP assumes investors are risk-neutral, treating all currencies as equally risky. If investors are risk-averse, they may demand a risk premium for holding certain currencies. This risk premium disrupts the equality
r - r* = Et[s˙], meaning UIP may not hold strictly in such cases.