Week 3 Flashcards
(62 cards)
PPE is initially recognised at cost. To recognise a cost outlay as an asset, the following criteria must be satisfied:
– it is probable that economic benefits will flow to the entity (not necessarily generated by the asset)
– the cost can be reliably measured.
Paragraph 7 of AASB 116/IAS 16
Where no new future economic benefits are expected to flow to the entity
costs incurred should be expensed (e.g. repairs but not betterments)
Component parts (with different useful lives) are
required to be identified and accounted for separately.
Example: not enough to recognise aircraft as a single asset- the engine, frame and fittings of an aircraft are likely to have different useful lives.
Initial measurement of cost
PPE is initially measured at the cost of the asset which includes
Purchase price (at fair value) (includes duties and taxes after deducting rebates and discounts)
Directly attributable costs (required to bring the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to operate)
Initial estimate of costs of dismantling, removing the item or restoring the site (at present value)
PPE to be measured at either
cost or fair value
the policy chosen must apply to the whole class of assets
Entities may switch from fair value to cost… i.e. revaluation model to cost model
Entities may switch from fair value to cost for justifiable reasons (will make the financial statements more useful to users; in particular, will the information be more relevant and/or more reliable — a requirement under AASB 108/IAS 8 paragraph 14.
and with adequate disclosures and need to adjust the information prepared previously if the switch is to cost.
Cost model
AASB 116 requires that assets are carried at cost less any accumulated:
– Depreciation
– Impairment losses.
Revaluation model is to be used
AASB 116 allows the revaluation model to be used for classes of assets.
Features of revaluation model
- Any revaluation of PPE must be to fair value.
- Market price is to be used where an active and liquid
market exists.
- Frequency of revaluations is not specified, but must be
performed with sufficient regularity such that the carrying
amount of assets is not materially different from their FV.
- Revaluation is performed on a class basis (requires class of assets to be revalued), but accounting
for revaluation is performed on an asset-by-asset basis.
Revaluation model
If FV(fair value)>CA:
there is an increase in the fair value of the asset
revaluation increment (potential profit – recognised as other comprehensive income (OCI), not profit and loss and is accumulated in equity as asset revaluation surplus (ASR)).
which is reported under reserves section under statement of financial position
Revaluation model
If FV(fair value)<ca:> </ca:>
revaluation decrement (potential loss – recognised as part of profit and loss).
To account for revaluation increments/decrements for depreciable assets, we can use the net method or gross method
net method
Net method - General procedure:
• Any balance of accumulated depreciation is credited to the asset account prior to revaluation, so the amount recognised for the asset is the revalued amount.
To account for revaluation increments/decrements for depreciable assets, we can use the net method
or the gross method.
Gross method
Accumulated depreciation may be restated proportionately with the change in gross carrying amount of the asset, so the carrying amount after revaluation is the revalued amount.
revaluation model an asset is
initially recorded at cost but subsequently its carrying amount is increased to account for any appreciation in value.
The difference between cost model and revaluation model
revaluation model allows both downward and upward adjustment in value of an asset while cost model allows only downward adjustment due to impairment loss
revaluation model: impairment loss is recognised as revalaution decrement cost model: impairment loss is recognised directly in P&L
Transfers may be made from the asset revaluation surplus (ARS) in the following circumstances:
– When a revalued asset is derecognised (i.e. scrapped or sold): the balance in the ARS may be transferred to retained earnings.
– When a revalued asset is being depreciated: the ARS may be progressively transferred to retained earnings over the useful life of the asset.
– Bonus shares may be issued from the ARS.
Impairment loss has occurred when
an asset’s carrying amount (CA) is more than its recoverable amount (RA).
Entities are required to conduct impairment tests to
ensure their assets are not overstated
Not all assets require impairment test. Notable exclusions:
– Inventories
– Deferred tax assets
– Assets held for resale.
The following assets must be tested annually:
– Intangibles with indefinite useful lives
– Intangibles not yet available for use
– Goodwill acquired in a business combination.
External indicators of impairment include
– Decline in market value – technological advancements
– Adverse changes in entity’s environment/market – eg a competitor may have patented a new product, significant drop in commodity prices, for example, would have an adverse impact on the estimation of future cash flows when determining an asset’s value in use.
– Increases in interest rates – increases the discount rate which affects assessment of an entity’s present value of future cash flows.
Internal indicators include:
– Obsolescence or physical damage
– Change in asset use – has the asset become idle?
– An asset’s economic performance being worse than expected.
If carrying amount (CA) > recoverable amount (RA) –
an imapirmentl loss has occured and the asset needs to be written down to its RA (AASB 136).
If carrying amount (CA) > recoverable amount (RA) – asset needs to be written down to its RA (AASB 136).
Carrying amount
cost of asset (or revalued amount) less acc. depreciation and impairment losses thereon.