Week 4 Test Development Flashcards
(28 cards)
Define test conceptualisation
Starts with a question.
1. Review the literature - relevant theories/ constructs, definition, parameter setting
- Obtain a clear, theory-informed conceptualisation and definition of the target construct
- Develop an initial item pool
Define test construction
.
Define tryout
Administering the test on a representative sample using standardised instructions.
Data from the test tryout used to narrow down number of items
What are 6 writing guidelines in test construction?
-
-
-
-
-
-
What are 8 writing guidelines in test construction?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
What are the four types of scales used in psychological test construction?
.
What are the pros/cons of Likert scales?
Pros - - - -
-
What are the two types of response formats in test construction?
- Likert
- B. C S
What are the pros/cons of Likert scales?
Pros - - - -
-
What are the pros/cons of binary choice scales?
Pros - - - -
-
-
What are the 4 types of response formats in test construction?
- Likert
- B. C S
- P. C
- C. S
- E or W
What are the pros/cons of binary choice scales?
Pros - - - -
-
-
What are the pros/cons of essay/ written format tests?
-
-
cons - - - - -
What are the 3 benefits of having an expert review an initial item pool before administering to the target sample?
- confirm/invalidate definition of construct by asking…
- evaluate the items c___ and c___
- identify other
Articulate the criteria that assess whether an item is a ‘good item’
good test items = good tests
achieved through item analysis.
criteria:
- reliability
- validity
- discriminates at different level of trait/ability
Articulate the criteria that assess whether an item is a ‘good item’
good test items = good tests
achieved through item analysis.
criteria:
- reliability
- validity
- discriminates at different level of trait/ability
What are the item properties which you may investigate when trying to assess whether an item is a ‘good item’?
- item difficulty/ distribution
- ## --
what is the formula for item difficulty index?
what does a high index mean?
What must also be considered when looking at optimal item difficulty index?
formula:
item difficulty index = examines who answered correctly/ total number of examinees
index= range between 0 & 1
high index =
consideration: probability of ___
Binary choice scales (BCS)(true/false) have a high probability of one guessing the item correctly (0.5 out of 1 on the item difficulty-index).
a) What is an optimal item-difficulty index for BCS?
a) 0.75 out of 1 on the item-difficulty index. It is better to set the optimal item-difficulty index higher because more people w4
Binary choice scales (BCS)(true/false) have a high probability of one guessing the item correctly (0.5 out of 1 on the item difficulty-index).
a) What is an optimal item-difficulty index for BCS?
A Multiple Choice Question test with 4 items has a item difficulty index of 0.25/ 1.
b) What is an optimal item-difficulty index for multiple choice questions?
a) 0.75 out of 1 on the item-difficulty index. It is better to set the optimal item-difficulty index higher because test takers have a high chance (0.5) of guessing correctly.
b) 0.625. It is lower because MCQ takers have a lower probability of guessing correctly (0.25/1)
In item analysis, there is an item property called dimensionality (factor analysis). Why would you use it?
Having a set of items doesn’t mean you have a scale
- items may not have underlying variable OR
- they may have multiple underlying variables
What can factor analysis help with?
- determining the # of underlying latent variables or constructs
- help condense information
- define content or meaning of factors
- identify that are performing better/worse e.g. items which don’t fit into any factor/fit into multiple –> elimination
What are the factor analysis decisions
number of factors to extract
- Eigenvalues (>1)
- Scree plot
Rotation
- helps interpret the data
- oblique: assumes factors are correlated
- Orthogonal: assumes factors uncorrelated
How is item reliability measured?
measures internal consistency of test