Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Contract Law > Week 5,6&7: Validity Of Contracts > Flashcards

Week 5,6&7: Validity Of Contracts Flashcards

1
Q

What is the effect of a successful challenge?

A
  1. Void or null

2. Voidable or annullable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are void contracts?

A

No contract exists or ever did legally. No one can acquire rights under such a contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the solution of a void contract?

A

Potential UE as per Stuart v Kennedy

No contract but wall built

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a voidable contract?

A

Contract is good and effective until it is annulled. Parties consent but consent is tainted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How can annulment happen?

A
  1. Intimation from one party to other

2. Judicial decree CS or SC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the requirements for a voidable contract?

A
  1. Restitutio in integrum
    As per Boyd & Forrest v Glasgow RY Co
  2. No affirmation by homologation
  3. No unnecessary delay in taking action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What contrasts void and voidable contracts?

A

Morrison v Robertson void

Macleod v Kerr voidable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Morrison v Robertson?

A

M sells cows to T who claims to be son of special farmer.

T sells to R, who buys in good faith.

Contract held void since error and fraud, never would’ve sold cows if T hadn’t said he was son of. Void means goods recoverable from innocent third party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

MacLeod v Kerr?

A

K sells car to Gall who says his name is L Craig.

Gall sells car onto G, purchased in good faith.

Police seize car and court decide contract voidable since only fraud. K would’ve sold car to anyone, wasn’t induced by misrepresentation. Voidable means can’t recover from third party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the grounds for invalidity?

A
  1. Force and fear
  2. Fraud
  3. Facility and Circumvention
  4. Undue influence
  5. Error
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is force and fear?

A

Force exerted scares other party. Usually seen as voidable but contradicted by Earl of Orkney v Vinfra who pulled a sword to try and force consent and held void.

Threats have to be reasonable causing of fear, consent usually voidable unless clear cut like Earl of Orkney. Can’t be lawful act.

Hislop v Dickson Motors; assistant steals, boss makes her pay, then twice, second too much

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is fraud?

A

Usually deliberately misleading statements by one party to undue the latter to enter a contract - fraudulent misrepresentation

Also get innocent and negligent misrepresentation but these aren’t fraud

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the remedy for fraud?

A

Voidable contract, reduction and damages

As per Derry v Perk
Boyd v Glasgow

Restitutio integrum must be possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What else is fraud?

A

Law of delict as well as contract. In delict damages also recoverable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is facility and circumvention?

A

Contract voidable and reducible when facile party has been imposed upon unfairly and misleadingly. Taking advantage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What three elements does it require?

A

Weakness and facility - not insanity

Circumvention (not fraud which involves intent to deceive)

Lesion - loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Example cases?

A

Mackay v Campbell

Thinks he’s dying sells island to friend for cheap, doesn’t die and court rules friend takes advantage of facile person

Anderson v The Beacon Fellowship

Depressed man donates a lot to group he was dependent on. He was facile, acceptance was circumvention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is undue influence?

A

A contract obtained by the exercise of undue influence by a person in a position of authority or trust is reducible

Like doctor or lawyer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Case for undue influence?

A

Honeyman’s Exrs v Sharp

Woman gives expensive art collection to adviser in will. Held undue influence upon her.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What must error be about?

A

Error about fact or law existing or past laboured under entering contract.

Can’t be mispronounced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What does it have to be?

A

An error in the five substantials as set out by Bell in Stewart v Kennedy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the exception?

A

Error isn’t in the substantials but error was induced by other party’s misrepresentation which caused the party to enter into the contract.

Error in motive and therefore voidable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is common error?

A

A mistaken shared assumption about the state of affairs on which a contract is based, forming a substantial.

As per Courtier v Hastie agent sells good that have already been sold unknown to him and therefore common error and contract void

24
Q

What is mutual error?

A

Misapprehension as to each others intention resulting cross purposes

As per Stuart v Kennedy, no clarity to meaning of per foot and therefore contract void

Mutual error isn’t really error but to do with no clarity that a court could bring as no clarity in original contract

25
Q

What is unilateral error?

A

An error made on one side of the contract. Usually not enough for voidable

26
Q

What is the exception?

A

Either:

Unilateral error was induced by another parties misrepresentation

Or

Error about the meaning and effect of a term which the other party knew of through course of negotiations but stayed quiet in bad faith. Contract then voidable. Error in transaction

27
Q

Cases?

A

Angus v Bryden: would’ve been reducible

Steuarts Trs v Hart

28
Q

Error in transaction?

A

Error about meaning or effect of term, intention doesn’t correspond with contractual declaration

29
Q

Error in motive?

A

Intention accurately reflected but intention was based upon mistaken appreciation of the real state of facts.

Usually caused by misrepresentation of other party like in Hart

Must be in substantials

30
Q

What is misrepresentation?

A

It is the plus factor for error plus

31
Q

What two things constitute misrepresentation?

A
  1. Must be inaccurate statement of fact and not expression of opinion or intention
  2. Statement must have been material so as to induce a party to the contract. As per Menzies v Menzies
32
Q

Will silence constitue misrepresentation?

A

Usually no as no duty to disclose

33
Q

What exceptions?

A
  1. Contracts uberrimae fidei- utmost good faith like contracts of insurance
  2. Parties are in fiduciary relationship, parent and child
  3. Statement is falsified by circumstances
  4. Appearance of goods exposed for sale is misleading
34
Q

What are the two natures of misrepresentation?

A

Innocent

Fraudulent

35
Q

What’s the third?

A

Also negligent misrepresentation that isn’t fraudulent but still gives rise to delict

Hedley Byrne v Heller

36
Q

What is pacta illicita?

A

The requirement of legality.

Contracts contents and obligations must be legal. If court detects illegality it can not give effect to the contract, don’t need arguments of parties

37
Q

Contracts objectionable on moral grounds?

A

Laughland v Millar

Director and manager made contract that was illegal and therefore unebforable

38
Q

What’s the issue with morality?

A

Concept of morality changes do cases with mora precedent may be out dated and therefore hard for a judge

39
Q

Contracts contrary to public policy?

A

Wide field for public safety or good foreign relations. Contracts that promote corruption in public life not allowed

40
Q

Cases?

A

Parkinson v College or Ambulance

Donated to CA for nomination for honour. Held unenforceable as promoted corruption.

Quantum Claims v Powell

P injured by As negligence. Contracted with Q/C for share of damages if claim successful, QC then instruct solicitors. Enforceable. Contingency fee however not allowed.

41
Q

What is a restrictive covenant?

A

An agreement not to exercise a particular trade or profession.

42
Q

When may it be pactum illicitum?

A

If it imposes a restriction wider than is reasonably necessary to safeguard the interest it is designed to protect

43
Q

Three types of covenant?

A
  1. Seller or business won’t compete with purchaser
  2. Employee agrees not to join rival business
  3. Contracts with partnerships, partner leaves cannot open competing business in certain areas

Five years seen as reasonable

44
Q

1?

A

Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns

Sale of business, world wide 25 year restriction held to be reasonable

45
Q

2?

A

Bluebell Apparel Ltd v Dickinson

2 years not allowed to work for competitor anywhere in the world. Trainee manager and upheld

46
Q

3?

A

Anthony v Rennie

Medical practitioner not to practice within 6 miles of Galashiels for five years upheld

47
Q

Contracts whereby manufacturers restrict the trading of a distributor?

A

Easy petroleum v Harpers Garage

Petrol company and tied garage can only supply their petrol. Held 4 1/2 years reasonable, 21 too long

48
Q

What is the test?

A

One of reasonableness, onus falls on person seeking to uphold it that it is reasonable

49
Q

What are the three main factors?

A
  1. Spatial area
  2. Duration of time
  3. Nature of restriction imposed

Also public interest

50
Q

Special cases?

A

Courts can uphold parts and strike down others as per Mulvein v Murray

Not to sell to Muls customers

Not to sell or travel in Ayrshire traded in by Mul not upheld

51
Q

Why is unlawfulness difficult under statute?

A

Language used not that of contract and thus tricky to know what it means

52
Q

What other difficulty arises

A

Not directly but impliedly prohibited

As per St John Shipping Corp v Joseph Rank Ltd

Overloaded ship against rules and did not relate to contract

Question of implied prohibition

53
Q

A second one?

A

Dowling and Rutted v Abacus FF

Illegal workers used, statute didn’t expressly say they’d broken law. Held valid.

54
Q

What are the consequences of unlawfulness?

A
  1. Cannot be enforced
  2. Cannot sue for damages
  3. Court can recognise blame
  4. Less blameworthy can claim UE
55
Q

Cases of this?

A

Cuthbertson v Lowes
Sale of potatoes by the Scotch acre void

Jamieson v Watts Trs
Building work above 40 pound not permitted by statutory license; payment could not be claimed above 40

Contract Law (8 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions