Week 5 and 6 Flashcards

1
Q

Research question development framework

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Spider question framework

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

PEO Question Framework

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Good survey questions

A

▪ Measures the concept it is trying to examine
▪ Doesn’t measure irrelevant concepts
▪ Means the same thing to all participants
▪ Example: In general, how would you rate your health?
▪ Excellent
▪ Very Good
▪ Good
▪ Fair
▪ Poor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

General rules for writing survey question

A

Avoid technical terms and jargon
Avoid vague or imprecise terms
▪ Example: How important is it to you that your supervisor meets with your regularly?
Define things very specifically
Avoid complex sentences:
Provide reference frames:
▪ Example: How supported do you feel by your supervisor?
▪ How supported have you felt by your supervisor in the past week?

Make sure scales are ordinal
▪ Example: All the time, some of the time, most of the time, half of the time, none of the time
Avoid double barrelled questions – Questions need to measure ONE thing.
▪ Example: Does your supervisor provide you with written and verbal feedback?
Responses should anticipate all possibilities
▪ Include an other, please specify category
Make sure your responses are unique
▪ Example: 0-4 hours, 5-9 hours, 10-14 hours, 15-19 hours, 20+ hours
Avoid questions using leading, emotional or evocative language
▪ Example: Do you support the use of student evaluation forms for supervisors to ensure that
terrible supervisors are not allowed to supervise students ever again?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

survey question types

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

survey question types
5 types

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Tips for questions

A

▪ Make sure you have clear instructions at the start of your survey/questionnaire
▪ How will you administer the survey/questionnaire?
▪ Facebook/Twitter
▪ Email
▪ Hard copy in person
▪ Mail
▪ Phone
▪ If administering survey over the phone – limit the number of questions and the
response options
▪ Pilot your questions!
▪ Do not develop them on your own!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Interviews
Advantages

A

▪ In-depth
▪ Semi-structured
▪ Key Stakeholder
▪ Narrative
▪ Life History
▪ Dyad
▪ Think aloud

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why use interview?

A

To increase rapport with participants
▪ Face-to-face contact
Provides support to participants
▪ Direct – “No-one has ever talked to me about this before”
▪ Indirect – through provision of feed-back, referral…
Increases response rate
Allows immediate clarification of your interpretation
▪ Increases validity of your data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Interview guides- what is the purpose of?

A

▪ Useful in structured and semi-structured
interviews
▪ May provide suggestions of prompts
▪ Allow for flexibility
▪ You may need to follow-up information that is given, yet
that you have not considered previously
▪ Allows researcher to pursue new avenues
of enquiry, based upon the responses given

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Interview questions
Use—- question
Don’t use —-

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Interview tips

A

✓Build rapport, allocate time to chat and build rapport
✓LISTEN, express interest
✓Encourage participant to expand - give more details
e.g. Can you tell me more about that?
✓Let responses guide the direction - keep within topics of interest
✓Use participant’s language – reflect it back
✓80% of interview must be participant
✓Avoid excessive use of ‘why’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Stages of interview

A

▪ Stage 1. Arrival and introduction
▪ Establish rapport
▪ Stage 2. Introducing the research
▪ Scope of interview but emphasise the ‘openness of responses’
▪ Stage 3. Beginning the interview
▪ Provide some context
▪ Stage 4. During the interview
▪ Use semi structured approach to make sure you cover the areas needed
▪ Stage 5. Ending the interview
▪ Give some advice ‘almost at end’ and then end positively
▪ Stage 6. After the interview
▪ Thanks for participation and the value they have provided.
▪ Provide them ongoing contacts, in case there are concerns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

focus groups and co-design workshops
Advantages

A

▪ Group interactions brings out different data (experiences/perspectives) to
individual interviews
▪ Exploratory – little known about participants or topic
▪ Testing ideas e.g. acceptability of a new program
▪ Evaluations
▪ Multi-method studies – triangulation
▪ Co-design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

focus groups and co-design activities

A

-Q-sorting or Card Sorting:
Participants categorize or rank cards representing concepts, revealing patterns or priorities.
River of Life: Participants visualize life experiences along a river, sharing narratives on challenges and aspirations.

Listing, Rating, Ranking: Participants generate lists, rate, or rank items, prioritizing ideas or identifying consensus.

Sentence Completion: Participants complete prompts, expressing thoughts and experiences freely.
Collages: Participants create visual representations using images, words, or symbols to convey perspectives creatively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

focus group tips

A

All will have a perspective on this topic
▪ All ideas are valid, may be different from each other
▪ No judgement/ no personal attacks from anyone please
▪ Healthy discussion and different views welcome
▪ We want to hear from each of you
▪ Might be asked directly for a response
▪ May be asked not to answer next
▪ Please no talking over anyone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Participant observation

A
19
Q

Data management

A

“Research Data Management covers all of the decisions made during the research lifecycle to
handle research data, from the planning stage of your project up to the long-term preservation
of your data.” (University College London, Research Data Policy)
◦ Where is your data stored?
◦ How will it be analysed?
◦ Who will have access to the data?
◦ What are the requirements for sharing data?
◦ What quality checks will you conduct?

20
Q

Research data

A

“Data are facts, observations or experiences on which an argument or theory is constructed or
tested. Data may be numerical, descriptive, aural or visual. Data may be raw, abstracted or
analysed, experimental or observational. Data include but are not limited to: laboratory
notebooks; field notebooks; primary research data (including research data in hardcopy or in
computer readable form); questionnaires; audiotapes; videotapes; models; photographs; films;
test responses. Research collections may include slides; artefacts; specimens; samples.”
(University College London, Research Data Policy)

21
Q

Data entry and coding
Store
Closed ended Q

A

Database to store the data e.g. Excel or REDCapTM – secure server, password protection
Data storage for returned surveys (locked cabinet)
Values to be entered for close-ended questions e.g. 1, 2, 3 vs A, B, C
Set up data dictionary

22
Q

Data coding

A

Examples of data coding:
◦ Assigning a number to a group of objects
→ use an unique number for categories
0 = No, 1 = Yes
0 = female, 1 = male
0 = <30 years; 1 = 30 – 39 years; 2 = >40 years

23
Q

Data management For Qualitative data
Privacy

A

Remove identifiable information from file names and documents.
Have a spreadsheet with identifiable information that is password protected and saved in a
different location

24
Q

Data Verification
Sources of error how to manage

A

Sources of error
◦ Data entry mistakes
◦ Data omissions
◦ Data errors
Mitigate errors
◦ Internal system checks e.g. permissible values
◦ Data integrity checks e.g. audit data (Data Integrity is the accuracy, completeness, and consistency of data throughout its lifecycle)
◦ Third party verification e.g. compared to admissions data

25
Q

Coding of missing data

A

Don’t know, Not assessed, Not applicable, Unknown, Refused….
◦ Are they the same?
◦ Do you apply the same numeric value?
E.g. Common codes:
◦ 98 = don’t know, 99 = refused
◦ Missing responses: 999 or ‘.’ or ‘blank’

26
Q

Other things to consider for data coding
Missing data
Reverse coding

A

Reporting frequencies
◦ Do you include or exclude people with missing data?
* What to do with additional responses ‘other’
* Reverse coding - One common validation technique for survey items is to rephrase a “positive” item in a “negative” way.

27
Q

Approaches to qualitative data analysis

A

Approach to analysis depends on
1.Research Question
2.Theoretical

Content analysis involves systematically analyzing text to identify patterns and themes.
Narrative analysis interprets stories to understand customer feelings and behaviors.
The thematic analysis identifies patterns and themes in data.
Grounded theory analysis generates hypotheses from data.

Deductive: Applying existing concepts or ideas to the data.
Semantic: Coding based on the explicit content of the data, focusing on factual codes.
Realist: Identifying reality evident in the data.
Inductive: Deriving codes directly from the data.
Latent: Coding based on underlying concepts and assumptions within the data.
Constructionist: Analyzing how reality is constructed in the data.

28
Q

Considering the influence of YOU
In qualitative data analysis

A

YOU are the data analysis tool
Qualitative data analysis is subjective and inductive
How YOU see the world will influence how you COLLECT your data and how you
INTERPRET your data
Acknowledge these influences
◦ Education
◦ Gender
◦ Religious affiliation
◦ Social class
◦ Biases, prejudice
◦ Preconceptions
◦ Ethnicit

29
Q

Qual data analysis (Rice and Ezzy, 1999)

A

Begins…
◦ Part of the research design
◦ Part of the literature review
◦ Part of theory formation
◦ Part of data collection
◦ Part of data ordering, filing and reading
◦ Part of the writing

30
Q

Glossary of terms
What is code
What’s category
What is theme

A

Code – A label, a name that describes the meaning of the text, usually one or two words
Category – Grouping codes that a related to each other through content or context. Organising codes
into a category. A category answers questions about who, what, when or where? Category names are
factual and short
Theme – Expresses underlying meaning across categories. Interpretative. Answers the questions why,
how, in what way or by what means. Poetic and metaphoric language can be used. Descriptive and uses
verbs, adverbs and adjectives.

31
Q

Inductive versus Deductive analysis

A
32
Q

Qualitative Analysis
Spectrum

A

Content analysis involves systematically analyzing text to identify patterns and themes.
Narrative analysis interprets stories to understand customer feelings and behaviors.
The thematic analysis identifies patterns and themes in data.
Grounded theory analysis generates hypotheses from data.

33
Q

Identify the unit of analysis

A

A tool to scrutinize your data: The tool or method used for data analysis.
Meanings: Individual interpretations or understandings.
Processes: Activities or workflows.
Practices: Observable behaviors or routines.
Encounters: Interactions or exchanges.
Narrative structures: Structural elements of stories.
Organizations: Specific institutions or entities.
Lifestyles: Patterns or choices in living.

34
Q

Qualitative coding
Different method 6

A

Deductive – existing concepts or ideas
Semantic – explicit content of the data (factual codes)
Realist – reality evident in the data
Inductive – derived from the data
Latent – concepts and assumptions underpinning the data
Constructionist – how reality is created in the data
Coding guide
◦ Can be developed prior to analysis based on literature review
◦ Evolves through the process of coding
◦ Codes can be FACTUAL (content analysis)
◦ or INTERPRETIVE (thematic analysis/grounded theory)

35
Q

Step 1: deconstruction/Fragmentation

A

Assign a code word or phrase that
accurately describes the meaning
of the text segment
Line-by-line coding is done first in
theoretical research (GT,
Framework) / segmentation
(applied thematic analysis)
More general coding involving
larger segments of text is
adequate for practical research

Breaks down data and reconceptualises it
Comparison between events, actions, and interactions
Apply conceptual labels
Group into categories
Develop initial relationships

36
Q

Coding
Can u used inductive and deductive coding in one study?

A

Can use deductive and inductive coding in one project
◦ Study title: ‘care-seeking, self-management and the drivers, costs and benefits of
complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) used by people with diabetes’ Manderson, L and
Canaway, R Camelot Study
Deductive codes ensure key areas are analysed
◦ Drivers or motivators of CAM use
◦ Costs of CAM use
◦ Benefits of CAM use
Inductive coding then further explores issues raised by participants
◦ e.g. Faith and spiritualit

37
Q

What can be coded?

A
38
Q

Clustering codes

A

After open coding text, make a list of all code words
Cluster similar codes and look for redundant codes
Objective:
◦ reduce the long list of codes to a smaller, more manageable number (e.g. 25 or 30)

39
Q

Things to look for
data analysis

A

Key phrases
◦ These are things that make some sort of (not necessarily describable) sense
Topics that occur and recur? (repetition)
◦ People often circle through the same ideas in their talk
Local or commonly-used terms used in an unfamiliar way

‘NVivo’ coding
◦ e.g. “women’s troubles,” “bad blood,” “difficulties”
Use of metaphor
◦ What do they represent?
◦ e.g. ‘Rock solid’ marriages are imagined to last, ‘cooking with gas’

40
Q

Step 2 – RECONSTRUCTION

A

Specify more rigorous codes
Put data back together – new ways of making connections between a category and sub-
categories
Interconnecting the data

41
Q

Coding Process (Charmaz, 1991)

A
  1. Begin by exploring the general research question
  2. Gather data, and code for respondents’ meanings, feelings and actions
  3. Look for processes and relationships between specific events and general processes
  4. Coding leads to new categories
  5. Collect more data on the developing categories
  6. Go back re-read earlier data for the new categories, formulate new questions
  7. Constantly compare individuals, different events, and categories
  8. Write memos throughout re; categories, processes, ideas
  9. Move towards memos that are more conceptual and codes that are more abstract
42
Q

Coding process (Creswell 2002)
Thematic

A
43
Q

Steps in reflexive thematic analysis – Braun
and Clarke

A
  1. Familiarisation with data
  2. Coding – apply labels to the data
  3. Generating initial themes – identify patterns from the coding
  4. Reviewing themes – check themes against coding – does it tell the story of the data? Does it
    answer the research questions?
    ◦ “themes are defined as pattern of shared meaning underpinned by a central concept or idea”
  5. Defining and naming themes – the story of the theme
  6. Writing up