week 8 Flashcards

(41 cards)

1
Q

define: phoneme

A
  • smallest unit of sound that are important to language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define: phonemic awareness

A
  • ability to parse words into phonemes
  • knowledge that words consist of separable sounds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

explain: phoneme awareness between japanese and american infants

A
  • higher awareness in american children at 10 - 12mths
    ⤷ same for both at 6 - 8mths
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define: morpheme

A
  • smallest units that convey meaning
    ⤷ ex. s, ing, suffixes and prefixes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

define: semantics

A
  • definitions + meanings of words
  • can represent conventions and societal norms
    ⤷ commonly used language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

define syntax

A
  • rules for combining words
    ⤷ ex. grammar
  • english = SVO
    ⤷ 42% of world
  • majority of world (45% of world)= SOV
    ⤷ including japanese, latin, hindi, korean
  • important for understanding context and meaning

**9% = VSO, 3% VOS, 1% VOS, less than 1% OSV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

define: pragmatics

A
  • communicative functions of language
  • rules that lead to effect comms
  • turn taking, nodding, shrugging
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

question: what language can babies use an infancy?

A
  • birth = crying
  • 1 - 2 mths = cooing, gurgling sounds
  • 6 mths = babbling
    ⤷ shows learning phonemes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

question: do children recog. words before they can speak them?

A
  • yes
  • sensitivity to exposure = attend more to words they are repeatedly exposed to
  • have innate bias to attend to speech than other sounds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

explain: statistical inference exp. (jusczyk 2002)

A
  • 8 mths = sensitive to statistical regularities in speech sounds
  • exposed infants to nonsense words for 3mins
    ⤷ sound stream didn’t have natural pauses between “words”
    ⤷ made fake words of 3 phonemes (bamuna, pokita, comida)
  • after 3mins = presented with random combinations or one of the fake words
    ⤷ children dishabituated to random combos but “learned” the fake words
  • overall shows infants can extract regularities
    ⤷ explains how syntax and SVO are learned
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

question: do children find it easier to ID a word starting with d or t if it’s preceded by s?

A
  • st = sound combo that can be found anywhere in a word
  • sd = sound combo usually found between words
  • children have easier
  • 9 mths = easier to ID new word if starts w/ a d
    ⤷ ex. this dag = easier than this tag
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

question: when do we see the emergence of gestures?

A
  • 8 - 12 mths
  • waving, nodding, pointing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

define: joint attention

A
  • ability for adult and infant to pay attention to the same tertiary thing/person
  • emerges around the same time when first words spoken
    ⤷ but not necessary for language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

explain: timeline of vocab development (starting with 1 word utterances)

A
  • 1 word = 6 - 15 mths
    ⤷ 50 total words at 18 mths
  • 2 word utterances = 18 - 24 mths
  • 3 word utterances = 2 - 3 years
    ⤷ showing grammar
  • novel word combos = 3 - 4 years
    ⤷ correct combos
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

question: when and what is a vocabulary spurt?

A
  • stage where infants learn new words much quicker
  • 10 words per week
  • 18 - 20 mths
  • theory = fast mapping
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

question: what’s a theory to explain vocab spurt?

A
  • fast mapping
  • connects new words to objects w/out considering all the possible meanings
    ⤷ not really learning, more of a description of reference
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

explain: one to one mapping in word learning

A
  • one word per object
  • name refers to a whole object
    ⤷ second names for smth already learned are understood as subcategory
    ⤷ ex. dog = learned so labradoodle must be a subcategory
18
Q

name: cross-cultural differences in word learning

A

infants learning mandarin, korean, japanese = learn more verbs earlier than english learning infants
⤷ bc asian lang. = SOV
- recency and primacy effects
⤷ V at end of sentences in japanese

19
Q

name + explain: examples of early word errors

A
  • underextension = defining word too narrowly
    ⤷ daddy is not just your daddy, others also have dads
  • overextension = defining a word too broadly
    ⤷ doggy for all animals
  • common during ages 1- 3 years
20
Q

question: when do children show mastery of morphology

A
  • preschool and gr. 1 show understanding of morphology
  • understand rules enough to apply them to new instances
    ⤷ ex. s = plural
21
Q

name: aspects of optimal language learning (4)

A
  • frequent exposure
  • interesting, responsive, interactive, meaningful contexts
  • responsive parenting/teaching/modeling
  • diversity in grammar and vocab
22
Q

explain: matthew effect in reading

A
  • good readers will enjoy reading -> read more -> get better at reading
  • vv for poor readers
  • widens gap between good vs poor readers
  • interventions should happen early to make a diff.
23
Q

question: what is the number 1 predictor of reading ability?

A
  • phonemic awareness
24
Q

explain: dyslexia

A
  • reading disability
  • reading ability = sig. worse than what it should be based on intellectual ability
  • best predictor = phonological processing
  • neurological basis = likely genetic
    ⤷ not envrt.
  • dep. on grapheme-phoneme correspondence
    ⤷ grapheme = smallest unit of writing representing a sound
    ⤷ ex. less dyslexia in italian speaking indiv.
25
explain: phonemic awareness diff. between english and italian
- eng = 40 phonemes, 1120 letter combos - ita = 25 phonemes, 33 letter combos - eng has deep orthography
26
explain: diff. in reading of boys and girls
- girls tend to score higher on reading tests than boys - absolute diff. = minor - dyslexia = more prevalent in boys - boys' learning = more affected by interest ⤷ girls = more willing to sit through things they don't like
27
explain: bilingualism acquisition
- best if before puberty - early acquisition -> using same brain areas when processing either lang. - stronger interference from 1st lang. w/ more years of exp. ⤷ older person = more interference
28
define: critical period (+question: what's critical period for bilingualism?)
- specific exp. necessary during a dev. period for a beha. to develop - bilingualism critical period = before puberty **recent research suggests interference from first lang hinders more than biological clock
29
explain: effect of critical period in the wild boy of aveyron and genie
WILD BOY OF AVEYRON - lived alone in woods - 5 - 11 years - never learned to comm effectively even after rescued bc missed critical period GENIE - prohibited from interacting w/ others until discovered at 13 - never mastered lang. either
30
explain: critical period in lang. learning for deaf children of hearing parents
- earlier the better - better mastery of sign language if taught gestures earlier - too much expertise can interfere w/ sign language acquisition
31
define: sensitive periods
- flexible time window where exp. has "optimal" effect on beha. - beha. can still be modified outside the window - time frame dep. on indiv. exp.
32
name: benefits of bilingualism (5)
better: - attentional control - concept formation - analytic reasoning - inhibition - cog. flexibility, complexity, monitoring **all from correlational data
33
explain: myth of bilingualism and how it got debunked
- myth: exposing infants to 2 lang. would harm dev. - no empirical evi. found that bilingual children have lang. deficits - bilingual children may start speaking later than monolingual FROM NON ENG HOMES - studies showed using native language and eng together = more successful than exclusively in eng - gives learning a meaningful and fun context -> better learning
34
explain: langage dev. perspectives (4)
BEHAVIOURIST - SKINNER - language is learned through classical and operant conditioning - doesn’t explain novel combinations, under/overextensions NATIVIST - CHOMSKY - humans born with neural circuits that allow for language learning - language acquisition device (LAD) - semantic bootstrapping: using existing resources to learn new words - universal grammar: every language has S, V, O COGNITIVE - PIAGET - infants/children extract regularities from perceptual environment - not a universal grammar but powerful cognitive abilities - evi. = vocab inproves as memory improves - doesn’t explain William’s Syndrome (low intelligence but high verbal abilities) SOCIAL - VYGOTSKY - children master language in context of social interactions - can incorporate behaviourist, nativist and cognitive POVs (overarching)
35
name: supports for universal grammar (5)
- part of nativist POV - have specific regions of brain for lang. processing - only humans learn grammar readily - children dev. lang w/ little/no formal input - have critical period for learning - dev. of grammar is tied to dev. of vocab
36
explain: impact of damage of brain regions on lang. (broca's and wernicke's)
- broca's aphasia = difficulty w/ speech production - wernicke's aphasia = difficulty w/ meaningful speech **brocas broken = nothing is spoken, understanding is tricky = damage to wernicke
37
explain: ability of bonobos and apes to learn language
- don't have fine voice control so learned sign language and use of symbols - mostly 2 word combos ⤷ mostly action-object combo ⤷ some 3 word combos but doesn't indicate understanding
38
question: is lang. unique to humans?
- yes - non-human animals can learn words ⤷ assoc. between symbols and things ⤷ but no mastery of syntax - 4 year old humans can use syntax ⤷ kanzi (bonobo) = around 3 year old lvl
39
explain: how children learn lang. in soundless or sightless envrt.
SOUNDLESS - learn same way hearing children learn spoken lang. ⤷ from parents - shows evi. for innate LAD SIGHTLESS - same dev. steps as sighted children - differences in interpretation ⤷ ex. when told to look up: blindfolded sighted children tilt heat up, blind infants raise hands - blind indiv. reading braille = activating in vis. cortex ⤷ only when exposed to braille for some time
40
explain: critical and sensitive periods as evidence for LAD
- genie and boy of aveyron couldn't learn lang. ⤷ suggests innate LAD ⤷ past critical period - another girl = isabelle ⤷ rescued at 6 yrs old ⤷ able to speak at same lvl as peers only 1 year later
41
question: how is grammar and vocab affected in bilingual children?
- it's not - grammar and vocab = correlated w/in each lang. but not across - don't confused the grammar ⤷ shows learning of vocab and their place (grammar) at the same time