week 9 Flashcards
(81 cards)
recall
the act of retrieving a target based on a cue that does not include the target
recognition
the act of retrieving a target based on a cue that includes the target
retention interval
the period of time between a learning event and a test of memory for that event
both recall and recognition accuracy decreased over time, at every retention interval participants’ recognition was superior to their recall. - illustrates?
The finding that people are often able to recognize material they cannot recall illustrates that when a person cannot recall a particular memory, it is possible that the memory is still available if the correct cues are given.
Thus, we should only consider the complete loss of a memory trace as forgetting.
How can a researcher determine the trace is truly gone?
can’t use the inability to recall information as a measure that the trace no longer exists, as there is ample evidence that people can recognize material they cannot recall.
recognition can also fail - “No, I don’t remember that” but, as the storyteller begins to recount the event, suddenly the memory returns
forgetting is “the inability to recall something now that could be recalled on an earlier occasion”
John Wixted refined Tulving’s definition further and stipulates that forgetting
defined as the inability to access information that was (a) successfully encoded and (b) could previously be retrieved by the same retrieval cue
referring to information that is inaccessible but not necessarily unavailable; forgetting can occur with or without the loss of the actual memory trace.
incidental forgetting
which occurs without the intention to forget
Forgetting that occurs due to neurogenesis, molecular decay, or interference
motivated forgetting
which occurs when an individual intentionally tries to suppress a memory.
motivated forgetting relies on deliberate psychological processes,
The Seven Sins of Memory, Daniel Schacter
transience, absent-mindedness, blocking, misattribution, suggestibility, bias, and persistence. Schacter (2002) classified each sin as either one of omission (a failure to recall) or commission (a distortion in memory;
Sins of omission
three reasons that people may fail to recall material,
transience—- which refers to the general loss of information over time. Transience can be caused by interference or decay
Absent-mindedness—– occurs when a person does not pay enough attention to the to-be-remembered material for the material to be recalled later. Forgetting where you placed your keys because you weren’t paying attention when you put them down is an example of absent-mindedness.
Blocking —-occurs when a person tries to retrieve an item from memory but another memory interferes, or “blocks,” that retrieval. Blocking is responsible for the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon where individuals know they know the information they want to retrieve but simply cannot retrieve it
Sins of Commission
misattribution—— which occurs when a person correctly recalls a piece of information but incorrectly recalls the source of that information. For example, a person may recall reading that vitamin X cures cancer, but incorrectly recall that the information came from a medical journal rather than its true source, which was an advertisement on social media.
suggestibility, ——-which involves changing a recollection because outside information suggests the original recollection is incorrect. For example, witness A may recall that the traffic light was green when an accident occurred; however, after hearing another witness insist that the light was red, witness A later “recalls” that the light was red.
Bias——— occurs when a person’s present state of mind influences how she or he recalls the past. For example, a person who is depressed may tend to recall more negative events from the last year than a person who is not depressed, although both individuals experienced the same number of negative events.
persistence—– which involves the unwanted recall of distressing memories, ranging from embarrassing incidents to scary and traumatic experiences. Persistence can contribute to the development of phobias and is associated with post-traumatic stress disorder
The Forgetting Curve
Ebbinghaus (1885) created lists of nonsense syllables (such as hep, vax, and cru), memorized them, and then tested his memory for the syllables at different points in time. The results of these experiments led Ebbinghaus to propose the forgetting curve
The forgetting curve is reflected in Jost’s law, which states that for memories of similar strength, older memories will decay more slowly than newer memories
Forgetting curves are one of the most reliable phenomena in psychology. Forgetting curves are observed for both recall and recognition and the rate of forgetting is the same regardless of the level of learning; people who learn material well forget at the same rate as people who know the information less well
forgetting curve shows that forgetting occurs at different points in time after learning
steep drop in recall at short time courses implies that much material is lost soon after learning
forgetting continues to occur at longer retention intervals as well. The shape of the forgetting curve suggests that there are different sources of forgetting.
first theory about how consolidation affects memory was proposed in 1900 by Georg Müller and Alfons Pilzecker
suggested that after a learning event, such as being presented with a word list, a period of perseveration begins, and that the longer the perseveration period is, the more consolidated a memory will be.
Because perseveration is a process that requires resources, Müller and Pilzecker’s theory predicts that perseveration will be less effective following activities that demand cognitive resources than following inactivity.
more forgetting following wakeful activity than following a similar delay during which the individual slept
first biologically based consolidation theory was proposed by Donald Hebb in 1949.
neurons require a period of perseveration during which time they create new connections.
perseveration is a purely biological process and when this biological process is disrupted, memories are not consolidated and forgetting occurs.
best evidence for Hebb’s theory that perseveration is biological is the occurrence of retrograde amnesia following traumatic head injuries. In these cases, individuals cannot recall events that happened just before the injury occurred, suggesting that the memories were not permanent at the time of experience, and that normal brain function was critical to their consolidation.
John Wixted has argued that new memories can produce forgetting of old memories if the new memories engage the same neural circuit as the old memory and if the old memory is not fully consolidated.
recently learned material can be forgotten if new information is sufficiently similar to the old, unconsolidated information
difficulty remembering brushing your teeth three nights ago because you have brushed your teeth several times since then.
Wixted’s (2005) argument is supported by the finding that inducing long-term potentiation (LTP) (the process that forms new memories) in the hippocampus weakens previously established LTP and impacts hippocampal memory
Consolidation theory can explain why some memories are never formed, but consolidation theory cannot explain
retrieval failures for consolidated memories, that is, memories that have been successfully retrieved in the past.
can’t explain why you were able to recall the first 40 elements in the periodic table two years ago but can’t do so today.
McGeoch (1932) suggested that there are two types of interference that lead to forgetting
proactive interference, where existing memories affect one’s ability to access newly formed memories
retroactive interference, where learning new material makes it more difficult to access older memories.
In the lab, proactive and retroactive interference have been studied extensively using a
paired-associate paradigm —- a research paradigm where participants study word pairs (such as DOG–horse) and then later learn new word pairs that partially overlap with the old pairs (such as DOG–chair)
Retroactive and proactive interference are calculated by
comparing recall in the experimental condition to recall in the control condition.
used the results from paired-associate paradigm experiments to propose the three-factor theory of forgetting
McGeoch argued that there were three causes of forgetting: response competition, altered stimulus conditions, and set
Response competition can affect retrieval if a query results in more than one item being retrieved. For example, in the paired-associate learning task- a participant may learn DOG–chair and then DOG–horse and then be given the query DOG–????? and instructed to complete it with the associate she or he learned first.- recall both chair and horse but not which was learned first and thus has forgotten the correct answer to the query. - blocking
altered stimulus conditions, or changing contexts, can cause retrieval failures. Researchers consistently find that when the context changes between learning and recall, performance is worse - -Abernethy found that students who were tested in the classroom they learned in performed better than students who were tested in another environment
set (which is sometimes also referred to as mental set). In these cases, retrieval fails because context causes an individual to retrieve the wrong set of information. For example, suppose a person is watching a movie and trying to remember the name of an actor who seems familiar. The person will develop a set of possible names based on movies she or he has seen in the past. However, if the individual in the movie is not actually an actor but is instead a famous sports figure, the name may be more difficult to recall because the correct set has not been activated. - reflects bias
interference theories fit experimental data well; researchers were able to produce proactive and retroactive interference in a variety of different learning situations.
consolidated memories become plastic (or changeable), and that retrieval of multiple memories simultaneously can lead to changes in individual memories, including the integration of new information into each trace
The individual will no longer be able to remember which location was the location of the first psychology lab, and thus a consolidated long-term memory will appear forgotten through interference.
For almost 100 years, interference was thought to be
the main source of forgetting of consolidated memories.
recent advances in the understanding of the cellular and molecular bases for long-term memory persistence suggest that
decay is also a source of forgetting, and that this forgetting is highly adaptive.