Will Substitutes Flashcards

1
Q

Inter vivos gift

A

Gratuitous transfers made during life that cannot be revoked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Inter vivos gift requirements

A

Intent, delivery, acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Gifts causa mortis

A

Gifts made in the anticipation of death, extra requirement: PERIL OF DEATH

Revocable (automatic if they survive, can be volitional before death too)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tenancy by the entirety

A

Marriage, time, title, interest, possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Joint tenancy

A

Time, title, interest, possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Tenancy in common

A

Possession alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Right of Survivorship

A

T/E + J/T

when one party dies, their interest vanishes while the other party’s interest swells

T/E: divorce/death

J/T: severed into T/C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Problem with concurrent interest

A

Partitions by sale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Pay on death contracts

A

“When I die, pay X”

Title changes at death

Revocable and amendable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Problem with POD contracts (common law)

A

Testamentary in nature, not valid unless executed under conditions set out by the Wills Act (which they typically were not)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

POD contracts (UPC 6-101)

A

Are valid even though they are testamentary in nature and not executed in compliance with the Wills Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

First exception to the Wills Act

A

Life insurance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Can life insurance beneficiary designations be changed by divorce?

A

Yes - automatically under some statutes

UPC 2-804 - Yes, automatic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Hillman v. Marietta

A

Under federal employee life insurance, federal law preempts state law and a former spouse wins if that
is who was designated.

UPC does not like this case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Can life insurance beneficiaries be changed by a will?

A

Yes in some states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cook v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

A

Terms of the life insurance policy controlled over a holographic will

17
Q

Costs of the Cook rule?

A

Cannot control all of your clients assets in a will, complicating estate planning

Rule leads to injustice when D thought things were changed

18
Q

Benefits of Cook Rule

A

Immediate payment of the proceeds

Less litigation

19
Q

POD mutual funds account

A

Work a lot like a will

Stake chooses market-index funds with no load and low fees

20
Q

POD brokerage accounts

A

Also work a lot like a will

Owner can control the investments within the range of publicly traded securities, mutual funds, and ETFs

NO PROPERTY INVOLVED

21
Q

POD bank/brokerage accounts disputes

A

1) True J/T (some of the asset could be a lifetime gift, and some at death by will subs.)

2) POD account

3) Convenience or agency account

4) T/C

22
Q

Medical savings account

A

tax benefits, make payable to spouse to keep the tax advantage

23
Q

IRAs

A

contain POD clauses

defined contribution of a personal pension

24
Q

Do wills change a POD designation in an IRA?

A

Some states: yes

Terms of the IRA: often NO

25
Q

Egelhoff v. Egelhoff

A

ERISA has no provisions for IRAs designation after divorce, and the state law cannot overtake it

26
Q

Majority in Egelhoff benefit:

A

Pension law uniform across state lines

Reduces cost of plan administration

Speeds up payments

27
Q

Dissent in Egelhoff approach benefit:

A

Intent is met

Divorce agreement is followed

WA law followed

UPC followed

Courts would not have to create a new rule to deal with areas of law not covered by ERISA

28
Q

Benefits defined pensions v. defined contribution accounts

A

Employee worries less about investing

To get some secure benefits, a DB costs less with more benefits