Wills Capacity Flashcards

(47 cards)

1
Q

What are the four items that determine testamentary capacity?

A
  1. the testator understood the nature of the act,
  2. The testator understood the proposed testementery disposition,
  3. The testator knows the natural objects of her bounty, (The testator knows the extent of her property,)
  4. The will represents the testator’s wishes

These items must be known by the individual at the time of the will’s execution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an insane delusion in the context of testamentary capacity?

A

A false conception of reality which the testator adheres to against all evidence to the contrary

Different from a mistake, because a will based on an ID can be corrected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the outcome of In re Honigman’s Will regarding insane delusions?

A

An insane delusion may preclude testamentary capacity even if the person acts reasonably about other subjects

Looked at what the testator beleived, and if they had sufficent evididence to believe that fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In the case of In re Wright’s Estate, what was determined about idiosyncratic acts?

A

Idiosyncratic acts alone are not enough to show incapacity

The presumption is of sanity, and isolated irregularities cannot negate testamentary capacity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the concept of a lucid interval in relation to testamentary capacity?

A

A mentally incapacitated person can make a valid will during lucid intervals

Valid inter vivos transfers can also occur during these intervals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What must be proven to establish a lack of testamentary capacity?

A

Proof showing the testator’s condition prevented a decided and rational desire regarding property disposition (wilson v lane)

Eccentric beliefs do not automatically disprove capacity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the majority rule regarding the burden of proof in testamentary capacity?

A

Once due execution is shown, the contestant has the burden of persuasion to show lack of capacity

This is established under UPC 3-407.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is required to invalidate a will due to insane delusions?

A

Must show the testator was under an insane delusion and the will was a product of that delusion:

  1. Need persistent belief not based in fact and adhered to against all evidence.
    * Party asserting has the burden.
  2. Material impact on agreement.
    * Is connection between delusion and subject of the contract strong enough that delusion destroys person’s ability to act rationally and understand their agreement.n

The delusion must have caused the creation of a will that would not have been made otherwise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is an insane delusion?

A

false conception of reality which the testator adheres to against all evidence to the contrary.

Different from mistake because a mistake can be corrected if T is told truth. Courts do not invalidate wills over mistakes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What defines undue influence in the context of will contests?

A
  1. Ability to exert undue influence
  2. Dominant position in a confidential or dependent relationship
  3. Opportunity to exert influence
  4. Susceptibility of the testator
  5. Unnatural will indicating the product of undue influence

Typically involves a caretaker influencing a testator with diminished capacity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Test for mental soundness

A
  1. Does a person know what they own, who they are giving property to, disposition they are making?
  2. These fit together to build an orderly disposition plan
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is undue influence?

A

A donative transfer is procured by undue influence if the wrongdoer exerted such influence over the donor that it overcame the donor’s free will and caused the donor to make a donative transfer they otherwise would not have made.

Designed to protect testator freedom from impositions less overt than fraud/threat of force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the key elements of the test for undue influence?

A
  • Dominant position based on confidential or dependent relationship
  • Opportunity to exert undue influence
  • Susceptible testator
  • Unnatural will showing that it is the product of undue influence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a confidential relationship in the context of undue influence?

A

A relationship where a person is required to consider the interest of others, including fiduciary, reliant, and dominant/subservient relationships.

Fiduciary relationships arise from settled categories of fiduciary obligation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What must a contestant prove to establish undue influence?

A
  • The donor was susceptible to undue influence
  • The alleged wrongdoer had an opportunity to exert undue influence
  • The alleged wrongdoer had a disposition to exert undue influence
  • There was a result appearing to be the effect of the undue influence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What circumstances may indicate undue influence?
“suspicious cirucmstances”

A
  • Weakened physical/mental condition of the donor
  • Participation of the alleged wrongdoer in will preparation
  • Lack of independent advice for the donor
  • Secrecy or haste in will preparation
  • Changes in donor’s attitude toward others
  • Discrepancies between new and previous wills
  • Continuity of purpose in former wills
  • Unnatural disposition of property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the significance of a no-contest clause?

A

It deprives unsuccessful contestants of their bequest under the challenged will, potentially deterring contests.

A substantial bequest may influence a contestant’s decision to contest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

True or False: A presumption of undue influence exists when an attorney receives a bequest via a will they drafted.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the burden of proof in undue influence cases?

A

The contestant has the burden of proof and can use circumstantial evidence to infer undue influence.

20
Q

What is the effect of a caregiver statute on undue influence claims?

A

It creates a presumption of undue influence where there is a caregiver on whom the donor relies for health/social services. (dont need fiduciary power)

21
Q

Fill in the blank: A lifetime transfer procured by undue influence is _______.

A

voidable by transferor

22
Q

What are some strategies to avoid will contests?

A
  • Use witnesses like community leaders during execution
  • Make multiple wills over time
  • Have witnesses attest to the condition of the testator
  • Have the testator write a letter detailing disposition
  • Video record discussions with the testator
  • Dictate to a stenographer
  • Hold a family meeting explaining the disposition plan
  • Professional examination of client capacity
  • Include a no-contest clause
  • Use inter vivos trusts with an institutional trustee
23
Q

What is the concept of ante-mortem/living probate?

A

A testator institutes an adversary proceeding to declare the validity of a will (while alive).

a lot of negatives associated with this (people trying to gain favor w testator etc)

24
Q

What is the role of independent advice in proving undue influence?

A

If the donor received independent advice from an attorney or other competent and disinterested advisors, it may help rebut the presumption of undue influence.

25
What does the term 'suspicious circumstances' refer to in undue influence cases?
Conditions that indicate the donor was in a weakened state or that the alleged wrongdoer had significant involvement in the will's preparation.
26
In re Estate of Sharis holding undue influence
the court held that the conduct of a named beneficiary may amount to undue influence without proof of specific acts (grandchild did all the communication about the will, transferred money to himself etc.)
27
What does MRPC Rule 1.8(c) state regarding lawyers and gifts?
Lawyers are not to solicit gifts on behalf of clients and should ensure that clients receive detached advice from different lawyers.
28
What must the court consider in cases involving a gay couple's relationship and undue influence?
Whether the will was the product of free and intelligent expression of the testator's intent or the beneficiary's dominance.
29
What can help establish the mental capacity of a testator?
A professional examination of client capacity.
30
what is the presumption assocaited with confidential relationships
Presumption of undue influence is available for a contestant if there is a showing of a confidential relationship between the influencer and testator and the presence of one or more suspicious circumstances.
31
testamentary capacity VS Undue influence
- Testamentary capacity: Question of status that concerns the mental ability of the testator - Undue Influence: Question of conduct concerning actions of a third party.
32
confidential relationship
a Relationship where a person is required to consider the interest of others. Includes, fiduciary, reliant, and dominant/subservient.
33
What is a no contest clause
deprives unsuccessful contestant of bequest under challenged will (the person who challenges and fails gets nothing)
34
What is the impact of a No Contest Clause
If accompanied by a substantial enough bequest, a no-contest clause may deter a contest. (bait the trap) Prospective contestant has choice of taking smaller, guaranteed bequest or fighting for a larger one and risking getting nothing.
35
What constitutes a donative transfer procured by fraud?
Wrongdoer knowingly/recklessly made false representation to donor about a material fact that led donor to make a donative transfer they would not otherwise have made. ## Footnote This definition emphasizes the need for intentional deception in cases of fraud.
36
What is the key to fraud according to Madoff?
Deception, requiring intentional lies; a mistake is not sufficient. ## Footnote This highlights the necessity of intent in fraudulent actions.
37
What are the components of fraud?
* Misrepresentation with tortious intent to influence testamentary disposition * Causing testator to do something they otherwise would not have done. ## Footnote These components outline the essential elements that constitute fraud in the context of will execution.
38
What is fraud in the inducement?
Occurs when a misrepresentation causes a testator to execute or revoke a will, or to include particular provisions in the wrongdoer’s favor. This type of fraud distinguishes itself from undue influence as the testator acts freely but is misled.
39
What was the outcome of McDaniel v. McDaniel?
Son misled parents about facts(said brother deserted them and went to FL) Which lead them to cut him out of the will this case establisehd sufficient grounds for both fraud due and to undue influence ## Footnote This case illustrates the intersection of fraud and undue influence in testamentary decisions.
40
What is the challenge in proving fraud caused the donor to make a disposition?
Establishing a direct link between the fraud and the donor's decision. ## Footnote This emphasizes the difficulty plaintiffs face in fraud claims related to testamentary dispositions.
41
What does R. (2) of Torts 774B recognize?
Intentional interference with inheritance or gift as a valid cause of action. ## Footnote This rule extends protections typically afforded to commercial expectancies to include inheritances.
42
relevant facts & Holding Schilling v. Herrera?
Caretaker had T execute new powers of attorney and wills, making Caretaker sole beneficiary, then notified family of T's death LATE after will process was complete. (fraud part) H: Injured party may establish tort of intentional interference w/ expectancy of inheritance by showing that tortious conduct resulted in loss of expectancy and such tortious conduct precluded injured party from seeking relief in court. ## Footnote This case highlights the potential for intentional interference with testamentary expectancies.
43
What must an injured party show to establish the tort of intentional interference with expectancy of inheritance? (shilling herrera)
* Existence of an expectancy * Intentional interference with that expectancy by tortious conduct * Causation * Damages ## Footnote These elements are critical for a successful claim in tortious interference cases.
44
What is the purpose of recognizing tortious interference with expectancy?
To protect the testator's interest by allowing a beneficiary to sue on their behalf. ## Footnote This legal recognition aims to offer remedies for losses incurred due to wrongful actions.
45
What is a notable rejection regarding tortious interference with expectancy?
Some courts reject this tort; The new tort aims to prevent interference with probate and provide complementary remedies. Cautions against an award of punitive damages.
46
UPC approach to no contest clause
You can bring a contest of a will where there is a “NCC” and you loose (fail to establish undue influence), you can still get what was written in the will by showing there was probable cause to bring the suit not as harsh as an outcome
47
Fraud in the Execution
Occurs when a person intentionally misrepresents the character/contents of signed instrument that does not carry out T’s intent. Cannot probate as restitution action but can prevent unjust enrichment by imposing constructive trust