WK 3 - Ethics & critical evaluation Flashcards

1
Q

A participant’s ability to agree to participate in a study in an informed manner.

A

Informed consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Systematic errors in observation or results caused by the observer’s expectations regarding the outcome of the study.

A

Observer bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A phenomenon in which an experimental intervention produces an effect because participants believe it will product an effect.

A

Placebo effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Studies in which participants and the experimenter are not aware of important aspects of the research.

A

Double-blind studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A group of participants in an experiment who receive a relatively neutral condition to serve as a comparison group.

A

Control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The deliberate act of not revealing the true purpose of an experiment to a participant before the study commences

A

Deception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The extent to which the findings of a study can be generalised to situations outside the laboratory

A

External validiy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A fallacy in argument based on attacking an opposing argument for the purpose of strengthening one’s own argument.

A

Straw man

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which type of study design involves randomly assigning participants to different groups to compare their outcomes?

A

Experimental

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which type of study involves following a group of participants over a long period of time?

A

Longditudional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Three main principles in the APS Code of Ethics

A
  • Respect for the Rights and Dignity of People
  • Propriety
  • Integrity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Five 5 principles of the NHMRC guidelines

A

Merit, integrity, justice, beneficence, respect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The ethical principle that requires that a study has a potential benefit or contributes to knowledge

A

Merit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The ethical principle that research is done honestly and is open to public scrutiny

A

Integrity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The ethical principle that requires that participants are treated fairly

A

Justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The ethical principle that requires that benefits of research outweigh any risks, harm or discomfort

A

Beneficence

17
Q

The ethical principle that requires researchers to recognise and maintain each person’s privacy, welfare, beliefs, culture and capacity to give informed consent

A

Respect

18
Q

What are the 3Rs for the use of animals for scientific purposes

A

Replacement of animals with other methods
Reduction in the number of animals used
Refinement of techniques used to minimise the adverse impacts on animals

19
Q

The way participants’ perceptions of the researcher’s goal influence their responses

A

Demand characteristics

20
Q

A participant’s ability to agree to participate in a study in an informed manner

A

Informed consent

21
Q

Systematic errors in measurement due to the researcher seeing what he or she expects to see

A

Researcher bias/experimenter bias

22
Q

Research designs that employ the logic of experimental methods but lack absolute control over variables

A

Quasi-experimental designs

23
Q

The fallacy that an argument must be true because of the authority or reputation of the person making it

A

appeals to authority

24
Q

The fallacy that a popular or widely believed argument is true

A

appeals to popularity

25
Q

The fallacy in argument based on attacking the authors of alternative arguments

A

Arguments directed to the person