Working Scientifically Flashcards

1
Q

Theories can involve different types of models- what are the two types of models used when explaining theories? Explain the models:

A

1) Representational Model- simplified description or picture of what is going on in real life. Like all models, it can be used to explain observations and make predictions. For example, Bohr Model.
2) Computational Models- use computers to make simulations of complex real-life processes, for example, climate change. They are used when there are a lot of different variables (factors that change) to consider. You can easily change their design to take into account new data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Do models have limitations- why?

A
  • Yes, all models have limitations on what they explain and predict.
  • For example, the ball and stick models can be used to show how ions are arranged in an ionic compound.
  • One of their limitations include that they don’t show the relative sizes of the ions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Scientific developments can create issues: what are the economic, social, personal, and environmental issues created with developments in the scientific world?

A

Economic Issues: Society can’t always afford to do things scientists recommend (e.g. investing in alternative energy sources) without cutting back elsewhere.

Social Issues: Decisions based on scientific evidence affect people- e.g. should fossil fuels be taxed more highly? The effect on people’s lifestyles is unacceptable.

Personal Issues: Some decisions will affect individuals. For Example, someone might support alternative energy but would object if a wind farm was built next to their house.

Environmental Issues: human activity often affects the natural environment. For example, building a dam to produce electricity will change the local habitat so some species might be displaced- but it will also reduce our need for fossil fuels, so will help to reduce climate change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the criteria for good evidence?

A
  • Repeatable- same person does an experiment again using the same methods and equipment, they’ll get similar results.
  • Reproducible- someone else does the experiment or a different method or piece of equipment is used, the results will be similar.

**repeatable and reproducible, reliable, and scientists are more likely to have confidence in it. **

-Valid results- both repeatable and reproducible AND they answer to original question; they come from experiments that were designed to be FAIR TEST.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the independent variable?

A

The variable you CHANGE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the dependent variable?

A

The variable you MEASURE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the control variable?

A

The variable you KEEP THE SAME

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why is a bigger sample size better?

A

Large samples are a better representation of the whole population- it shares many characteristics in the population.

For example, it is more realistic to study a thousand people, with a mixture of ages, gender, and race.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does the resolution of a measuring equipment mean?

A

The smallest value a measuring instrument can detect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a RANDOM ERROR?

A

Human-influenced anomaly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a SYSTEMATIC ERROR?

A

If a measurement is wrong by the same amount every time- repeating the experiment in the case of a systematic error in the exact same way and calculating a mean will not correct it!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a ZERO ERROR?

A

Type of error caused if a systematic error is caused by using equipment that isn’t zeroed properly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is an ANOMALOUS RESULT?

A

A result that doesn’t fit in with the rest of the results or the pattern.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When do you present your data in a bar chart?

A

If:

  • independent variable is categoric (distinct categories)
  • independent variable is discrete (can be counted in chunks, no -in-between value)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When do you present your data in a plotted graph?

A

If:

-both variables are continuous (numerical data can have any value within a range)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do you calculate the gradient of a graph?

A

Gradient. = change in y ÷ change in x

Pick two points on the line that is easy to read and a good distance apart

Draw a line down from one, and a line across from the other to make a triangle. The line drawn down the side of the triangle is the change in y, the line across the bottom is the change in x.

17
Q

What is a positive correlation?

A

As one variable increases, the other increases.

18
Q

What is inverse correlation?

A

As one variable increases, the other decreases

19
Q

What is no correlation?

A

NO relationships between two variables.

20
Q

What are the 3 possibilities for a correlation:

A

1) Chance
2) Linked by a 3rd variable
3) Cause

21
Q

How do you describe how an experiment could be improved (6 points):

A

1) Comment on method- was it valid, did you control all the variables to make it a fair test.
2) Comment on the quality of results- enough evidence to reach a valuable conclusion? Were the results repeatable, reproducible, accurate, and precise?
3) Any anomalous results? If there were none, say so. If there were, explain them.
4) How confident are you based on this analysis that your conclusion is right.
5) Suggest any changes to the method that would improve the quality of the results.
6) You could make more predictions based on your conclusion- then further experiments could be carried out to test them.