X Flashcards
In a not-for-profit entity, which of the following should be included in total expenses?
Grants to other organizations and depreciation
Grants to other organizations
Depreciation
Neither grants to other organizations nor depreciation
Grants to other organizations and depreciation
Per FASB ASC 720-25-25-1, contributions made by a business are considered expenses of the period. Not-for-profit entities recognize expenses the same way as businesses, so the contribution would be considered an expense with the other expenses of the period. FASB ASC 958-720-45-15 lists depreciation as an expense.
Belle, a nongovernmental not-for-profit entity, received funds during its annual campaign that were specifically promised by the donor to another nongovernmental not-for-profit health entity. How should Belle record these funds?
Increase in assets and increase in liabilities
Increase in assets and increase in revenue
Increase in assets and increase in deferred revenue
Decrease in assets and decrease in fund balance
Increase in assets and increase in liabilities.
Donors often use one not-for-profit as an intermediary to forward donations to the ultimate recipient. If the intermediary has the right to redirect the resources, then it would recognize restricted support or revenue. In this case, Belle has been given specific instructions to forward the resources to another entity and has been given no discretion. It is acting as an agent.
“Deferred revenue” and “fund balance” are governmental terms not used for a private not-for-profit.
Young Corp. purchased equipment by making a down payment of $4,000 and issuing a note payable for $18,000. A payment of $6,000 is to be made at the end of each year for three years. The applicable rate of interest is 8%. The present value of an ordinary annuity factor for three years at 8% is 2.58, and the present value for the future amount of a single sum of one dollar for three years at 8% is 0.79. Shipping charges for the equipment were $2,000, and installation charges were $3,500. What is the capitalized cost of the equipment?
A. $19,480
B. $21,480
C. $24,980
D. $27,500
C. $24,980
The capitalized cost of the equipment is $24,980:
Down payment $ 4,000 Present value of note ($6,000 x 2.58) = 15,480 Shipping charges 2,000 Installation charges 3,500 Total $24,980
A company’s foreign subsidiary operation maintains its financial statements in the local currency. The foreign operation’s capital accounts would be translated to the functional currency of the reporting entity using which of the following rates?
Historical exchange rate
Functional exchange rate
Weighted-average exchange rate
Current exchange rate at the balance sheet date
Historical exchange rate
When translating the capital accounts of a subsidiary, the historical exchange rate is used for the capital stock account and additional paid-in capital. This date cannot be earlier than the date the parent acquired the investment in the subsidiary.
Lando Company had the following items:
Service revenue $64,000
Gain on early extinguishment of bonds 41,000
Realized loss on sale of equipment 76,000
Foreign currency translation gain 23,000
Loss on impairment of building 9,500
Which of the following amounts would the statement of comprehensive income report as other comprehensive income or loss?
$13,500 other comprehensive income
$23,000 other comprehensive income
$42,500 other comprehensive income
$53,000 other comprehensive loss
23,000 other comprehensive income
Other comprehensive income includes items such as gains and losses on foreign currency translation ($23,000), gains and losses on derivative instruments, gains or losses associated with pension or other postretirement benefits, and unrealized holding gains or losses on available-for-sale debt securities.
All of the other items presented in the problem are included in net income.
After determining that a valid contract exists, what would be the next step in determining the appropriate revenue recognition approach in accounting for revenue from licenses?
Classify the license as either one of functional intellectual property or symbolic intellectual property
Determine if Topic 606 or specialized industry guidance applies
Allocate the transaction value in the contract to the license agreement
Determine whether the license is distinct from the other promises in the contract
Determine whether the license is distinct from the other promises in the contract
A good or service is distinct if it is both of the following: the good or service is capable of being distinct (i.e., it can be used on its own or in combination with other goods or services that could be obtained elsewhere by the customer); and it is separately identifiable (i.e., each obligation is distinct in terms of the contract; the seller is providing individual goods or services as opposed to providing a combined good or service in which the individual goods or services function as an input). If the good or service is not distinct, then combine the good or service with other goods or services until a distinct bundle is formed.
Distinct licenses are classified as either of the following: functional intellectual property (the license has significant standalone functionality; revenue is recognized when access to the license is granted) or as symbolic intellectual property (the license has no standalone functionality; revenue is recognized over the term of the license).
Income tax-basis financial statements differ from those prepared under GAAP in that income tax-basis financial statements:
do not include nontaxable revenues and nondeductible expenses in determining income.
include detailed information about current and deferred income tax liabilities.
contain no disclosures about finance and operating lease transactions.
recognize certain revenues and expenses in different reporting periods.
recognize certain revenues and expenses in different reporting periods.
Both income tax-basis and GAAP-basis financial statements recognize all the financial activities of a company’s business. However, it is the timing of this recognition that differs between the two methods. For income tax-basis financial statements, taxable revenues and tax-deductible expenses are recognized in the financial statements in the same period they are reported in the tax return. For financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, all revenues and expenses are recognized using the accrual method of accounting.
Pine Corp.’s books showed pretax income of $800,000 for the current year ended December 31. In the computation of federal income taxes, the following data were considered:
Gain on involuntary conversion (Pine has
elected to replace the property within
the statutory period using total proceeds.) $350,000
Depreciation deducted for tax purposes in excess
of depreciation deducted for book purposes $50,000
Federal estimated tax payments $70,000
Enacted federal tax rates 30%
What amount should Pine report as its current federal income tax liability on its December 31 balance sheet?
$50,000
$65,000
$120,000
$135,000
$50,000
The current income tax liability is based on the taxable income for the year and the tax rate for the year, so one needs to compute taxable income first.
The pretax income was $800,000 and part of this amount is a gain that qualifies for tax deferral, the reinvested proceeds from the involuntary conversion gain. Also, the amount of tax depreciation is used to compute taxable income.
Taxable income is $400,000 ($800,000 less the gain of $350,000, and less the additional tax depreciation of $50,000). This amount multiplied by the tax rate of 30% gives us the tax due of $120,000 ($400,000 × 0.30). Because some of this amount due has been paid in estimates already, only the remaining $50,000 is a liability yet to pay ($120,000 – $70,000).
Which of the following conditions must exist in order for an impairment loss to be recognized?
I. The carrying amount of the long-lived asset is less than its fair value.
II. The carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable.
I only
II only
Both I and II
Neither I nor II
II only
FASB ASC 360-10-35-17 establishes a recoverability test to determine when an impairment loss is to be recognized. If the undiscounted sum of estimated future cash flows from an asset or asset group is less that the asset’s or asset group’s book value, an impairment loss may need to be recognized. The impairment loss is the difference between the book value of the asset(s) and its (their) fair value. Note that there is not an impairment loss if the fair value exceeds the carrying amount.
Carr, Inc., purchased equipment for $100,000 on January 1, Year 1. The equipment had an estimated 10-year useful life and a $15,000 salvage value. Carr uses the 200% declining balance depreciation method. In its Year 2 income statement, what amount should Carr report as depreciation expense for the equipment?
$13,600
$16,000
$17,000
$20,000
$16,000
Year 1 depreciation = $100,000 × ((100% ÷ 10) × 2) = $20,000
Year 2 depreciation = ($100,000 - $20,000) × 0.20 = $16,000
On July 1, 20X0, Gee, Inc., leased a delivery truck from Marr Corp. under a 3-year operating lease. Total rent for the term of the lease will be $36,000, payable as follows:
12 months at $ 500 = $ 6,000
12 months at $ 750 = 9,000
12 months at $1,750 = 21,000
All payments were made when due. In Marr’s June 30, 20X2, balance sheet, the accrued rent receivable should be reported as:
$0.
$9,000.
$12,000.
$21,000.
$9,000
This problem tests the rule that straight-line recognition should be used to record the rent revenue, regardless of the payment schedule. At $1,000 per month (straight-line), total revenue recognized by the end of the second year should be $24,000. Since cash was actually received at that point in the amount of $15,000 ($9,000 + $6,000), a receivable of $9,000 remains in the rent receivable account for the difference ($24,000 − $15,000).
Hint: It helps to do journal entries and T accounts to see how this works, using the following three accounts: rent receivable, rent revenue, and cash.
An investor purchased a bond classified as a long-term investment between interest dates at a discount. At the purchase date, the carrying amount of the bond is more than:
the face amount of the bond.
neither the cash paid to the seller nor the face amount of the bond.
the cash paid to the seller.
both the cash paid to the seller and the face amount of the bond.
neither the cash paid to the seller nor the face amount of the bond.
If the investor buys a bond at a discount, then the bond will be carried at the discount price initially, which is below the face amount of the bond. However, if the investor buys a bond between interest payment dates, the investor will pay (in part) for the already accrued interest that the investor will soon receive back. Thus, the carrying amount of the bond will actually be less than the total the investor pays to acquire the bond, both its discount price plus the amount paid for the interest receivable.
Deed Co. owns 2% of Beck Cosmetic Retailers. A property dividend by Beck consisted of merchandise with a fair value lower than the listed retail price. Deed in turn gave the merchandise to its employees as a holiday bonus.
How should Deed report the receipt and distribution of the merchandise in its income statement?
At fair value for both dividend revenue and employee compensation expense
At listed retail price for both dividend revenue and employee compensation expense
At fair value for dividend revenue and listed retail price for employee compensation expense
By disclosure only
At fair value for both dividend revenue and employee compensation expense
FASB ASC 845-10-30-1 provides that “a nonmonetary asset received in a nonreciprocal transfer should be recorded at the fair value of the asset received. A transfer of a nonmonetary asset to a stockholder or to another entity in a nonreciprocal transfer should be recorded at the fair value of the asset transferred.”
Both receipt of the dividend and the distribution of the merchandise to employees should be recorded at fair value as dividend revenue and employee compensation expense.
Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts 8 (SFAC 8), Chapter 8, lists four limitations/constraints to consider related to disclosure requirements. They are:
cost constraint, materiality, potential adverse consequences, and historical cost.
relevance, representational faithfulness, materiality, and predictive value.
cost constraint, potential adverse consequences, future-oriented information, and relevance.
representational faithfulness, materiality, future-oriented information, and predictive value
cost constraint, potential adverse consequences, future-oriented information, and relevance
Is related to required financial statement note information:
- Relevance: Disclosure is based upon relevance, not entity-specific materiality.
- Cost constraint: The FASB has an expectation that financial statement users have awareness of accounting rules, policies, and regulations; thus, common knowledge can be excluded from the notes. Disclosure should include details of measurement if alternatives exist, methods not obvious to the user, or methods if changed since prior reporting.
- Potential adverse consequences: The FASB will consider potential adverse consequences. Disclosure can have both beneficial and adverse consequences.
- Future-oriented information: The FASB does not require entities to disclose predictions of future outcomes that could result in negative consequences. However, two types of forward-looking information are useful and should be provided: (1) estimates and assumptions, and (2) management’s existing plans and strategies for management-controlled matters
A corporation recently issued $4 million of 10-year, 3% bonds at 101. There were 200,000 detachable stock warrants included as part of the sale. Each warrant allows the bondholder to purchase one share of no-par common stock for $12 per share. On the date of issuance, the stock warrants had a fair value of $1 per warrant. By what amount did the corporation’s long-term debt increase as a result of this issuance?
$3,840,000
$4,000,000
$4,040,000
$4,200,000
$3,840,000
Corporations sometimes issue certificates with bonds, known as stock warrants, that give the holder of the warrant the right to purchase a specified number of shares of stock at a specified price within a specified time period. Stock warrants are included in the definition of equity securities and classified as shareholders’ equity on the balance sheet. Their fair value must be computed at the time that they are issued and separated from the value of the bond, which is classified as debt rather than equity.
In this example, the fair value of the warrants on issuance is known, $200,000 ($1 fair value per warrant × 200,000 warrants). This $200,000 would increase stockholders’ equity. Total cash received for the bonds with warrants was $4,040,000 ($4,000,000 × 1.01). The remaining $3,840,000 ($4,040,000 – $200,000) is allocated to the bonds payable account (long-term debt).
Lloyd Company had the following data regarding income tax expense at the end of 20X1:
Current income tax expense $151,000
Deferred income tax benefit (from decrease
in deferred tax liability) 27,400
Deferred income tax expense (from decrease
in deferred tax asset) 44,300
How much will Lloyd report as total income tax expense in its 20X1 income statement?
$222,700
$167,900
$151,000
$134,100
$167,900
Total income tax expense is the combination of current income tax expense, deferred income tax benefit and deferred income tax expense. For this case, it is computed as follows: $151,000 – $27,400 + $44,300 = $167,900
When a full set of general purpose financial statements are presented, comprehensive income and its components should:
appear as a part of discontinued operations and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.
be reported net of related income tax effect, in total and individually.
appear in a supplemental schedule in the notes to the financial statements.
be displayed in a financial statement that has the same prominence
be displayed in a financial statement that has the same prominence.
The FASB requires that all items that are recognized as components of comprehensive income be reported in a financial statement that has the same prominence as other financial statements. However, the FASB does not prescribe a specific format for the display of such information.
When a lease entered into by a governmental unit represents the acquisition of a general capital asset, the acquisition should be reflected as:
an expenditure but not as an other financing source.
an other financing source but not as an expenditure.
both an expenditure and an other financing source.
neither an expenditure nor an other financing source.
both an expenditure and an other financing source.
Under the current financial resources measurement focus used in governmental funds, neither capital assets nor long-term liabilities are recorded in those funds. However, the inception of a lease should be reported in the governmental fund from which the lease payments will be made. GASB 1800.128 states in this regard: “An expenditure and other financing source should be reported in the period the lease is initially recognized.” This is a “wash” entry that has no effect on fund balance.
The following is Gold Corp.’s June 30, 20X1, trial balance:
TRIAL BALANCE
June 30, 20X1
Debit Credit
Cash overdraft $ 10,000
Accounts receivable (net) $ 35,000
Inventory 58,000
Prepaid expenses 12,000
Land held for resale 100,000
Property, plant, and equipment (net) 95,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 32,000
Common stock 25,000
Additional paid-in capital 150,000
Retained earnings 83,000
$300,000 $300,000
======== ========
Additional information:
• Checks amounting to $30,000 were written to vendors and recorded on June 29, 20X1, resulting in a cash overdraft of $10,000. The checks were mailed on July 9, 20X1.
• Land held for resale was sold for cash on July 15, 20X1.
• Gold issued its financial statements on July 31, 20X1.
In its June 30, 20X1, balance sheet (statement of financial position), what amount should Gold report as current assets?
$225,000
$205,000
$195,000
$125,000
$225,000
Cash ($30,000 - $10,000) $ 20,000
Accounts receivable (net) 35,000
Inventory 58,000
Prepaid expenses 12,000
Land held for resale 100,000
Current assets on June 30, 20X1 $225,000
========
Since the land was held for resale and was indeed sold before issuance of the financial statements, the land should be classified as a current asset.
The overdraft shown in the trial balance is assumed to be the overdraft related to checks mailed in July.
The $30,000 in checks should not have been recorded (deducted from cash) in June since they weren’t issued until well into July. The $30,000 clearly remained in cash on June 30 and must be added back.
Green Co. had the following equity transactions at December 31:
Cash proceeds from sale of investment in Blue Co.
(carrying value $60,000) $75,000
Dividends received on Grey Co. stock 10,500
Common stock purchased from Brown Co. 38,000
What amount should Green recognize as net cash from investing activities in its statement of cash flows at December 31?
$37,000
$47,500
$75,000
$85,500
$37,000
Cash proceeds from the sale of an investment are a cash inflow and cash paid to purchase stock is a cash outflow. Both are investing activities.
• $75,000 - $38,000 = $37,000
The Securities and Exchange Commission was created under which of the following acts?
The 1933 Securities Act
The 1934 Securities Exchange Act
The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act
Both the 1933 Securities Act and 1934 Securities Exchange Act
The 1934 Securities Exchange Act
Both the 1933 Securities Act and the 1934 Securities Exchange Act were designed to restore investor confidence after the 1929 stock market crash. The 1933 act contains accounting and disclosure requirements for the initial offering of stocks or bonds. In addition to requirements for secondary market offerings, the 1934 Securities Exchange Act created the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Tott City’s serial bonds are serviced through a debt service fund with cash provided by the general fund. In a debt service fund’s statements, how are cash receipts and cash payments reported?
Cash receipts: Revenues; Cash payments: Expenditures
Cash receipts: Revenues; Cash payments: Operating transfers
Cash receipts: Operating transfers; Cash payments: Expenditures
Cash receipts: Operating transfers; Cash payments: Operating transfers
Cash receipts: Operating transfers; Cash payments: Expenditures
A transfer between funds does not carry a stipulation for repayment between the funds and does not meet the definition of revenue. Therefore, any answer with “revenue” would never be correct. The purpose of a debt service fund is to make the required payments on the debt and would be a classic example of an expenditure.
Which of the following is false regarding the reporting of capital assets at the entity-wide perspective?
Depreciation of general capital assets, including infrastructure capital assets, should be reported by function.
Depreciation on general capital assets, including infrastructure, is always required.
Depreciation is not taken on infrastructure assets accounted for using the modified approach.
General capital assets, including infrastructure capital assets, should be reported at known or estimated historical cost less any accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation on general capital assets, including infrastructure, is always required.
Under GASB 1400.105, certain infrastructure capital assets are not required to be depreciated under the modified approach. The other three statements are true.
In October 20X2, Hake paid $375,000 to a former employee to settle a lawsuit out of court. The lawsuit had been filed in 20X1, and on December 31, 20X1, Hake had recorded a liability from lawsuit based on legal counsel’s estimate that the loss from the lawsuit would be between $250,000 and $750,000. Select the proper financial statement category for recording the gain or loss upon settlement of the lawsuit.
Income from continuing operations
Nonoperating revenue and gains
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
Prior-period adjustment to beginning retained earnings
Income from continuing operation
The gain or loss from the settlement of the lawsuit would properly be included in income from continuing operations.