Yokley and Glenwick (1984)- results & conclusions Flashcards

(14 cards)

1
Q

Explain another result of the study?

A
  • The specific and monetary incentive group produced a 29% increase in number of immunisations recieved.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How much of an increase did the specific and monetary incentive group produce?

A

29%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The reseacrhers also investigate the most-cost effective interventions. What did they find?

A
  • The specific and monetary incentives were the MOST COST-EFFECTIVE signficant intervention in the LONG-RUN.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the MAIN conclusion of the study?

A
  • Specific, targeted interventions like personalized reminders, monetary incentives, and reducing barriers were significantly more effective at improving preschool immunization adherence than general strategies.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What do these specific, targeted interventions (personalised reminders, incentives, reducing barriers) help demonstrate?

A
  • HOW behavioural strategies could be applied in real-life community and clinical settings to tackle health-related challenges.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Summarise the results of Yokley and Glenwick (1984)?

A
  • Was there any changes/ impact? The study found satistically significant differences across the intervention groups.
  • Monetary intervention? Had the most powerful/ immidiate effect.
  • What was the most & least effective measures? Monetary, specfic, general, no-contact control.
  • Combined effectiveness? both specific prompt and monetary incentive led to sig 29% increase in immunisation/ adherence.
  • Long term effectiveness? Most cost-effective measure was the specific prompt group.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which result demonstrates that the intervention groups has a real, measurable impact on adherence?

A

The study found statistically signficant differences between the intervention groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What result demonstrated that the monetary incentive group had the most significant effect?

A

The monetary incentive group had the most powerful and immidiate effect on adhernece.

(More parents acted immediately when money was offered)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the order of effectiveness and immediate impact of the interventions?

A
  1. Monetary Incentive Group – highest, most immediate effect.
  2. Increased Access Group
  3. Specific Prompt Group – targeted information increased action.
  4. General Prompt Group – vague reminders were somewhat helpful.
  5. Control Group – no change; lowest adherence rates.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which interventions combined together increased adhernece even more?

A

Both the Specific Prompt Group and the Monetary Incentive Group led to a 29% increase in immunizations.

(suggest targted communication alone can be quite powerful- even w/out money)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Did the interventions have long-term effectiveness?

A

The positive impacts of the interventions remained statistically significant even at: 2-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly