⚔️👑1066 - Fight for the Throne⚔️👑 Flashcards
(35 cards)
list the 4 claimants to the throne in 1066
Harold godwinson
Edgar aetheling
William of Normandy
Harald hardrada
list five reasons why Harold godwinson was a good claimant to the throne in 1066
- he claimed the king had promised it to him on his deathbed
- he had been kings chancellor
- he was great military commander
- he was married to Edith, kings sister
- he was English
list one reasons why Harold godwinson was a bad claimant to the throne in 1066
- he allegedly swore oath to William in 1064 over religious relics to make William king
list 2 reasons why Edgar atheling was a good claimant to the throne in 1066
- only blood relative
- atheling means throne worthy - indentified since birth
list three reasons why Edgar atheling was a bad claimant to the throne in 1066
- no support from earls
- no military experience
- only 14
list three reasons why William of normandy was a good claimant to the throne in 1066
- allegedly promised throne by king in 1051and Harold in 1064
- had backing of pope, and therefore god
- strong military leader
list three reasons why William of normandy was a bad claimant to the throne in 1066
- no firm evidence to back claims
- foreigner - not Anglo saxon
- no support from earls
list four reasons why Harald hardrada was a good claimant to the throne in 1066
- feared and respected ruler -hardrada means hard ruler
- big army - 15,000 men with 300 long ships
- Vikings had ruled England before last king
- support of the north of england
list one reasons why Harald hardrada was a bad claimant to the throne in 1066
- no support of English earls
how many cavalry did William have at the battle of hastings
2,000
why were Williams cavalry an advantage in the battle of hastings
- highly trained
- heavily armoured
- the English were not used to fighting against them
why were Williams cavalry an disadvantage in the battle of hastings
they struggled to charge uphill
why were Williams infantry an advantage in the battle of hastings
- lightly armoured
- well armed
why were Williams infantry an disadvantage in the battle of hastings
some of his men came from across Europe - they didn’t know how to fight alongside cavalry
who arrived first at the battle of hastings
Harold godwinson
what did Harold do when he arrived at the battle of hastings
he arranged his soldiers at the top of a hill surrounded with woodland and march and made a sheild wall
why was Harold’s defensive position at the battle of hastings effective
it made Williams archers and cavalry less effective
he couldn’t be flanked
he was in the front line so it boosted moral
why did Harold have a disadvantage at the start of the battle of hastings?
his men were exhausted from the battle of Stanford bridge and having to walk across the country twice
he had no archers
he was in the sheild wall and had no command over his troops
describe Harold’s army at the battle of hastings
housecarls - full time soldiers, well armoured, huge battle-axes
fyrd - poorly trained, had to provide own equipment
why did William win at the battle of hastings
leadership
preparation
tactics
luck
army/weapons
how did Williams leadership help him win the battle of hasting
gave rousing speech to inspire men
when men thought he dead, William rode with no helmet to show he alive
ordered archers to fire at Harold’s bannerman
how did Williams preparation help him win the battle of hasting
got approved by pope - holy crusade for god
gathered and strengthened army - 2,000 horses fed 13 tones of grain and also of hay
how did Williams tactics help him win the battle of hasting
feigned flight - pretended to retreat to draw Saxons out and break sheild wall
how did Williams luck help him win the battle of hasting
William was able to set sail just as Harold was in North fighting Vikings