11 13 Branching processes in discrete time Flashcards

1
Q

look at notes

A

notes done?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Branching processes in discrete time:Introduction
assumptions

A

Assume each individual of a population lives a fixed time (one generation) and produces at the end of its life a #offspring that is a RV with
some probability pₖ
#offspring for each is i.i.d
thus defines a branching process in discrete time.

All Markov processes are memoryless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Branching processes in discrete time: offspring distribution

A

{pₖ}ₖ₌₀ ∞

collection of all pₖ

P {X = k} ≡ Probability{X = k} = pk, k = 0, 1, 2, . . .
where p_k = P {X = k}

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

All Markov processes are memoryless

A

the number of individuals in generation n + 1, called
Zₙ₊₁, depend on Zₙ (number of individuals in generation n), but not on the past history of
the process Z0,Z1, · · · ,Zₙ₋₁(number of individuals in each generation 0 to n − 1).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Branching processes in discrete time:

Zₙ - #individuals in the nth generation

The #individuals in the (n+1)th generation?

A

The #individuals in the (n+1)th generation written as the sum of Zₙ independent RVs:
Zₙ₊₁ = X₁+X₂+X₃+..+X_{Zₙ}

{Zₙ independent Rvs in this sum}

X_i are iid
X_i represent #offspring of the ith member of the nth generation, independent realisations

(Markov property is satisfied- this is also a RV)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Branching processes in discrete time: Extinction of the population when?

A

if Z_n = 0 ⇒
Z_m = 0 for all m > n

if p₀≠ 0: one individual can have no offspring
extinction happens if all individuals in one gen have no offspring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Branching processes in discrete time: The mean
assume Z_0 given

A

Z₀=1 define the mean number of offspring of one individual i of the population in a given generation as µ

µ ≡ E(Xᵢ) = E(X)
= Σ{ₖ₌₀,..∞} kpₖ = p₁ + 2p₂ + 3p₃ + · · ·

idd for every individual i of every generation n, thus
E(Xᵢ) = E(X) and
the mean number of offspring of one individual is µ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Branching processes in discrete time: The mean number of individuals in generation n+1

A

E(Zₙ₊₁)
= E(ΣXᵢ) (for i=1,…,Zₙ)
= E(X₁) +…+E(X_{Zₙ})
= µ +…µ = µ E[Zₙ]
(Zₙ terms)

Zₙ is RV taking values k=0,1,….,E(Zₙ₊₁) also infinite sum of terms kµ with weights p(Zₙ=k) probability of k individuals in gen n having on average µ offspring:

E(Zₙ₊₁) = Σ{ₖ₌₀,..∞} kµP{Zₙ=k}
= µ E(Zₙ)

iterating:
E(Zₙ) = µE(Zₙ₋₁) = µµE(Zₙ₋₂)=…
=µⁿ⁻¹ µE(Z₀) = Z₀µⁿ = Z₀ exp(n lnu)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Branching processes in discrete time: The mean number of individuals in generation n+1 used to show exponential function:

A

iterating
E(Zₙ) = µE(Zₙ₋₁) = µµE(Zₙ₋₂)=…
=µⁿ⁻¹ µE(Z₀) = Z₀µⁿ = Z₀ exp(n lnu)

Thus: mean number of individuals increases exponentially as a function
of n if µ > 1, and decreases exponentially with n if µ < 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Branching processes in discrete time: Extinction of the population looking into this

probability that the population is not extinct by generation n is

A

If Zₙ individuals in gen n then the probability that the pop goes extinct in gen n+1 is p₀^{Zₙ}
(Zₙ is an RV so hard to find)
However, if Zₙ=0 for some n then Zₘ=0 for all m>n
Thus the probability that the population goes extinct by generation n (i.e. at, or before, generation n) is
0 ≤ P { population is extinct by n} = P {Zn = 0}.

probability that the population is not extinct by generation n is

0 ≤ P { population is not extinct by n} =
P {Zₙ ≥ 1}
= P {Zₙ = 1}+P {Zₙ = 2}+P {Zₙ = 3}+· · · .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Branching processes in discrete time: Comparing probabilities of extinction to E(Zₙ)

A

E(Zₙ)
= P{Zₙ=1}+2P{Zₙ=2}+3P{Zₙ=3}+…

Thus
probability that the population is not extinct by generation n is
0 ≤ P { population is not extinct by n } ≤ E(Zₙ).
We know that E(Zₙ) = Z₀µⁿ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Branching processes in discrete time:Conditions

0 ≤ P { population is not extinct by n } ≤ E(Zₙ) = Z₀µⁿ

A

If µ < 1 POPULATION EXTINCT sooner or later/guaranteed

P {Zₙ ≥ 1} ≤ µⁿ
P { population not extinct } → 0 as n → ∞

If µ > 1 then extinction is not guaranteed, but is still possible

This means that in this case, the population can go extinct or keep growing with a certain probability. Some realisations of the population obeying the rules of the branching process go extinct, but some never do and keep growing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Branching processes in discrete time: notation the probability uₙ that the population consisting initially of a single individual Z₀ = 1 is extinct by generation n

A

uₙ ≡ P {Zₙ= 0|Z₀ = 1}.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Branching processes in discrete time: finding the probability uₙ that the population consisting initially of a single individual Z₀ = 1 is extinct by generation n

uₙ ≡ P {Zₙ= 0|Z₀ = 1}.

A

u₀=0
u₁ =p₀
(if p₀=0 no pop extinction ever, so for this analisis assume 0<p₀<1)

uₙ prob of extinction by time for gen n and is an increasing function of n as it includes the possible extinction events at 1,2,..,n

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Branching processes in discrete time:
uₙ ≡ P {Zₙ= 0|Z₀ = 1}.
uₙ = φ(uₙ₋₁ ), with u₀ = 0,

how we found

A

k individuals when n = 0: probability that whole pop dies out before the nth gen is the prob that, independently k sub-families starting with one individual die out
P {Zₙ = 0|Z₀ = k} = uₙᵏ

if k individuals when n=1 we have
P {Zₙ = 0|Z₀ = k} =P {Zₙ₋₁ = 0|Z₀ = k} = uₙ₋₁ᵏ
If Z₀ =1
P {Z₁ = k|Z₀ = 1} = P {X = k} = pₖ

can then write expression of u_n in terms of u_{n-1} summing over all poss values of k which links to pgf of X

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Branching processes in discrete time: Example

Suppose that p0 = 0.2, p1 = 0.4 and p2 = 0.4.
Then φ(z) =
.

A

φ(z) = 0.2 + 0.4z + 0.4z^2
,
u1 = 0.2,
u2 = φ(u1) = φ(0.2) = 0.2 + 0.4 × 0.2 +0.4 × 0.2^2

for increasing n: 0,1,2,3,4,5
un
u0=0
u1= φ(u0)=0.296
u2=0.353…

17
Q

Branching processes in discrete time:

Is extinction the ultimate fate of the population?

A

*uₙ is an increasing function of n when p_0 > 0

*As n → ∞, uₙ approaches a limit u (with 0 ≤ u ≤ 1) which is the probability that extinction ever occurs,
and satisfies
u = φ(u)

the probability u that the pop extinction ever occurs is a fixed point! solutions s.t 0 ≤ u ≤ 1.
from pgf properties φ(1) = 1 is always a solution
u=1 always a fixed point

18
Q

Branching processes in discrete time:

Is extinction the ultimate fate of the population?

show u=1 is a unique fixed point

A

extinction certain
u = 1 is the unique fixed point of φ when φ’(1) ≤ 1
and it corresponds to population extinction with probability Hence,
population extinction is certain when φ’(1) ≤ 1.
diagram: φ(u) against u increases and meets line y=u

population extinction possible but not certain
when φ’(1) > 1 , there is another solution u∞= φ(u∞)
giving a fixed point
0 < u∞ < 1 (stable as |φ’(u∞)|<1) and u=1 unstable as because |φ’(1)| > 1)

diagram: φ(u) against u increases and meets line y=u twice, once at u∞ then at 1

19
Q

Extinction summary:

A

*The mean number of offspring from one individual is µ = φ’(1).

  • If µ ≤ 1 then extinction is guaranteed: u_n → 1 as n → ∞.
    The entire population goes extinct, sooner or later.

*If µ > 1 then extinction is not guaranteed (but still possible):
un → u∞ as n → ∞,
where 0 < u∞ < 1 and satisfies u∞ = φ(u∞).

*In a fraction u∞ of all realisations of the branching process, the population goes extinct, and in the other realisations (a fraction 1 − u∞ of them) there is no extinction and the population grows unbounded

20
Q

Example. Suppose that p0 = 0.2, p1 = 0.4 and p2 = 0.4. Then, φ(z) =
extinction?

A

φ(z) = 0.2 + 0.4z +0.4z²
φ’(z) = 0.4 + 0.8z, and the solution to is
u = 0.2 + 0.4u + 0.4u²
0 = 0.2 − 0.6u + 0.4u²
⇒ two fixed points: u = 0.5, u = 1.
Here, µ = φ’(1) = 0.4 + 0.8 = 1.2 > 1, and hence u = 0.5 is stable and gives the extinction probability ⇒ probability that the population ever goes extinct is u∞ = 0.5

21
Q

Interested in more general branching processes in discrete time: what do we need for a complete understanding of a discrete-time branching process describing the number of individuals in a population?

A

pdf of each of the RVs Z_n

giving the number of individuals in the nth generation of the
population. These can be obtained from the probability generating functions for Zn,

22
Q

pgf for discrete time branching processes: Deriving the pgf for the #individuals Zₙ in each generation n
Z_0
Z_1

A

we use initial condition Z₀=1 assuming single individual in the population and assume each individual in all generations leave behind X offspring with pgf of X φ(z)

  • If Z₀=1 : Z₁ has the same probability distribution as X pgf φ(z)
  • pgf for each Zₙ:
    gₙ(z) = ΣP(Z ₙ=k)zᵏ = E(Z^{Zₙ})
    (k=0,…,∞)

*Z₀=1
g₀(z)=z or δₖ,₁zᵏ
where δₖ,₁ kronecker delta function

g₁(z) = φ(z) as same probabilities Z₁=k as X=k as its the initial individual

23
Q

δₖ,₁ kronecker delta function

A

δₖ,ₘ = 1 if k=m
=0 if k/= m

24
Q

pgf for discrete time branching processes: Deriving the pgf for the #individuals Zₙ in each generation n

Zₙ₊₁
related to Zₙ?

A

Zₙ₊₁ = Σ Xᵢ from i=1 to Z ₙ £
each parent i contributing to pop in Zₙ₊₁
RV sum of RVs
so pgf:
gₙ₊₁ (z) = E(z^{Zₙ₊₁})
= E(z^(£))
= Σ_{k=0,∞} P(Zₙ=k)E(z^{Σ {i=1,k}Xᵢ})
= Σ
{k=0,∞} P(Zₙ=k)E(z^X₁)….E(z^Xₖ)
=Σ_{k=0,∞} P(Zₙ=k) (φ(z)ᵏ) = gₙ(φ(z))
** thus we have the recurrence relation**
gₙ₊₁(z)=gₙ(φ(z)) for n ≥ 0, with g₀(z) = z

25
Q

pgf for discrete time branching processes: Deriving the pgf for the #individuals Zₙ in each generation summary pgf for Z_n

A

g₁(z)=φ(z)
g₂(z)= g₁(φ(z)) = φ(φ(z))
….
gₙ(z)= φ(….φ(φ(z)…) (n-1 compositions)
= φ(gₙ₋₁)

gₙ₊₁(z)=φ(gₙ(z))
meaning we also have
gₙ₊₁(z) = φ(gₙ(z)) for n ≥ 0, with g₀(z) = z,

26
Q

pgf for discrete time branching processes: Deriving the pgf for the #individuals Zₙ in each generation WHEN Z_0=k>1

A

Each individual of the initial gen produces an independent family
Z_n in generation n is a sum of k identically distributed RVs

E(z^{Z_n} | Z₀=k)
=(E(z^{Zₙ}| Z₀=1))ᵏ
= (gₙ(z))ᵏ
(gₙ(z) is pgf of Zₙ when Z₀=1

This means that it
suffices to focus on the case with Z₀ = 1 to obtain gₙ(z) and then simply
use above to find the probability generating function of Zₙ if initially Z₀ = k>1

27
Q

Example. If the probabilities of having no children, one child and two children are
respectively p0, p1 and p2, then how many grandchildren can you have and with what
probability?

A

Let X be #children and let Z₂ be #grandchildren
g₂(z) be the pgf of Z₂.
assume p₀+ p1 + p₂ = 1,
with pₙ = 0 for n /∈ {0, 1, 2}.

pgf of X :** φ(z) = p₀ + p₁z + p₂z²**
pgf of Z₂:
g₂(z) = φ(φ(z))
= p₀ + p₁φ(z) + p₂φ(z)²
= p₀ + p₁(p₀ + p₁z + p₂z²)+ p₂(p₀ + p₁z + p₂z²)
=p₀ + p₀p₁ + p₀²p₂ + (p₁² + 2p₂p₀p₁)z²+ (2p₂²p₁)z³
+(p₂³)z⁴

defn of g₂(z) ≡
sum_k [ P {Z₂ = k} zᵏ

P {Z₂ = 0} = P { zero grandchildren } = p₀ + p₀p₁ + p₀²p₂
P {Z₂ = 1} =P{1 grandchild} = p₁² + 2p₂p₀p₁
P {Z₂ = 2} = P {2 grandchildren } = p₁p₂ + pp₁² + 2p₂²p₀
P{Z₂=3} =P{3 grandchildren } = 2p₂²p₁
P {Z₂ = 4} = P{ 4 grandchildren } = p₂³

{z }

28
Q

pgf for discrete time branching processes: summary part 2

A

We have obtained two equivalent forms for the recurrence relation giving the pgf of Zₙ₊₁, with
g₀(z) = z (Z₀ = 1):

gₙ₊₁(z) = gₙ(φ(z)) and gₙ₊₁(z) = φ(gₙ(z)).
It is also instructive to look at the second version:
gₙ₊₁(z) ≡ E(z^{Zₙ₊₁} ) = p₀ + p₁ E(z^{Zₙ₊₁}|Z₁ = 1) + p₂E(z^{Zₙ₊₁} |Z₁ = 2) + · · ·

= p₀ + p₁ E(z^{Zₙ}|Z₀ = 1) + p₂E(z^{Zₙ}|Z₀ = 2) + · · ·
= p₀ + p₁ gₙ(z) + p₂gₙ²(z) + · · ·
=Σₖ pₖgₙᵏ(z) ≡ φ(gₙ(z)).

29
Q
A