1.1- law making Flashcards

(12 cards)

1
Q

Explain parliamentary process

A

Green paper- initial report to provoke discussion

White paper- draft of bill

First reading- introduction of bill to HoC

Second reading- main principles debated

Committee- bill examined line by line, by committee

Report- committees recommended amendments are put in a report and considered in HoC

Third reading- final chance to debate

Lords- Bill goes to HoL who ping pong amendments to HoC

Royal assent- monarch authorises change from bill to law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is precedent

A

decisions from judges create law for future judges to follow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is original precedent

A

judges create law in new and novel situations
e.g. Donoghue V Stevenson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is binding precedent

A

earlier decision must be followed if there are similar case facts
e.g. Daniels V White

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is persuasive precedent

A

not binding, but court finds precedent appropriate to apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how does ‘overrule’ avoid precedent

A

a higher court decides lower court was wrong
E.g. R V R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how does ‘reverse’ avoid precedent

A

higher court on appeal may reverse decision
e.g. R V Woolin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how does ‘distinguish’ avoid precedent

A

distinguish differences between case facts, so applying is not relevant
RE A (2000)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

literal rule of statutory interpretation

A

gives words their plain and ordinary meaning, even if outcome is absurd
E.g. Whitely V Chappel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

narrow golden rule of statutory interpretation

A

two meanings but one would produce unwanted outcome
e.g adler v george

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

wide golden rule of statutory interpretation

A

not ambitious meaning but literal rule would produce repugnant outcome
RE Sigsworth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Mischief rule of statutory interpretation

A

look at what deviance statute was intended to cover, so apply to cover gap
Smith V Hughes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly