1.1 | Religious Figures And Sacred Texts Flashcards

(54 cards)

1
Q

Birth Narratives

A

Story of Jesus birth appears in the gospel of Matthew and of Luke

They are not identical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Matthew 1:18–2:23

A

Emphasises Joseph

Includes marriage of Mary and Joseph

Announcement from an identified angel

Includes the wisemen visit

Shows Jesus fulfilment of prophecy

Implies Jesus was born in a house

Includes the flight to Egypt and the massacre of the innocence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Luke 1:26–2: 40

A

Emphasises Mary and Elizabeth (John the Baptist mother)

Includes birth of John the Baptist and the census

Announcement from Angel Gabriel

Includes the Shepherds visit

Has hymns and appeals to history

Implies Jesus was born stable and put in a manger

Includes Jesus’s presentation at the temp when circumcision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Birth narrative crossovers

A

Jesus came to save humankind

He was born in Bethlehem when Herod was king

Jesus was the son of God

His mother was Mary

Mary was engaged to Joseph

Conceived by the Holy Spirit

Mary was a virgin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Consistency and credibility

A

Luke’s history is inaccurate
—> Quirinus’ Census would’ve been after Herod

Luke hymns predate his gospel

Lack of evidence
—> Matthew’s massacre of the innocents is not verifiable

Miracles make both accounts less believable
—> virgin birth

Stories have different details
—> house vs manger
—> magi vs shepherds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Harmonisation

A

Combination of Matthew and Luke’s accounts- different perspectives
—> all events could be true

Supports Doctrine of Incarnation

Wisemen + shepherds may have both visited

Flight to Egypt could’ve occurred after temple visit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Redaction Criticism

A

Theory that New Testament writers alter pre-existing texts about Jesus to suit their own agenda
—> stories not directly revealed/ dictated by God

Accounts not created by Matthew + Luke

Matthew + Luke use common sources

Luke
—> gentile audience
—-> humble nature; visited by shepherds
—> quotes from sepugint
—>emphasised by the Greeks

Matthew
—> Jewish audience
—> visited by magi
—> focus on OT prophecy
—> genealogy connected to King David; threat to Herod

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Incarnation

A

‘To become flesh’

Latin: carnis- flesh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Doctrine of Incarnation

A

God becoming human in the form of Jesus Christ

*has caused controversy
—> God’s nature is eternal but human…?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What Doctrine of Incarnation Does Not Suggest

A

Dual personality disorder

Jesus possessed by God/ Holy Spirit

Ordinary human adopted by God

Half human + half God

Two Gods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hypostatic Union

A

Jesus is fully human + fully God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Person of Christ- Conception

A

Jesus conceived through Holy Spirit

Didn’t inherit Original Sin
—> wasn’t seminally present in Adam

Evident in
Matthew 1:18
Luke 1:35

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Person of Christ- Uncreated

A

Jesus is perfect and eternal

“Begotten not made, of one being with the Father” - Nicene Creed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Matthew 2:13

A

Jesus protected by angels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Matthew 1:23

A

Jesus called ‘Immanuel’
—> ‘God with us’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Substantial Presence

A

Emphasis on Jesus’ DIVINE nature
—> divine characteristics from birth
—> not inherited

Jesus fully human + fully divine

God visible in human form through Jesus

Supports Matthew

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Matthew 2:1-2

A

Jesus worshipped by magi due to divine role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Evidence of Substantial Presence

A

Virgin birth

Called Immanuel

Protected from harm
—> Herod was a threat

Visited by magi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Criticisms of Substantial Presence

A

Suggests God is limited by time and space

Challenges transcendence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Kenotic Model

A

Emphasis on Jesus’ HUMAN nature

Jesus fully human + fully God

Kenosis- (greek) ‘make empty’
—> God empties Himself of divine character (eg. Omnipotence, omniscience)

Jesus experienced real suffering, poverty + vulnerability

Associated with Gottfried Thomasius

Supports Luke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Evidence

A

Humble birth

Circumcision

Flight to Egypt
—> bring a refugee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Criticism of Kenotic Model

A

Imply Jesus ceased to be God
—> through emptying of divine characteristics

Could suggest God changes despite being ‘immutable’

23
Q

Difficulties with Incarnation

A

Doctrine of Incarnation not known by Gospel writers

Jesus is not referred to as God

‘Son of God’ could refer to any appointed divine leader

Natural birth

24
Q

Resurrection

A

Resurrectio- (Latin) ‘rise again’

Recorded in all 4 gospels

Jesus was
- crucified
- died
- placed in a tomb
- body vanished
- appeared to followers alive in physical form

25
Theological Significance to Resurrection
Central to Christian Belief —> foundation of early Christian faith + mission Symbolises Jesus’ victory over sin + death Validation Jesus as ‘Son of God’ + ‘Messiah’
26
Rudolf Bultmann
Pre-scientific world view Difficult to relate to Identify myths + interpret them ‘Sitz im leben’ - situation in life Form criticism- study of the original text
27
What Bultmann covers
Problem with literal resurrection Myths Demytholising Kerygma
28
Problem with the literal resurrection (Bultmann)
Modern people shaped by science + rationalism Struggle to believe in supernatural events —> physical resurrection
29
Myth (Bultmann)
Resurrection is a myth —> not a lie —> it’s a SYMBOLIC narrative to convey DEEPER TRUTH Impossible to accept literal understanding of resurrection —> especially for modern readers; although disciples did believe it meaningful in the original sitz im leben (situation in life) —> ie. For readers —> would need reinterpretation today
30
Demytholising (Bultmann)
To uncover underlying message/ kerygma of resurrection Resurrection is about the rise of faith within believers and disciples Focus shifts from a historical miracle to existential meaning a call to authentic faith + transformation
31
Kerygma (Bultmann)
Preaching/ proclamation —> proclaims victory in defeat + renewal of faith —> understand deeper meaning Resurrection points to new life + hope —> not just a past event Emphasises the TRANSFORMATIVE message of salvation Too reductionist Not a reason to disregard myths
32
N.T Wright
Critical realist Modern New Testament Scholar Believed resurrection accounts contain truth that must be analysed —> more history; contrast to Bultmann
33
Compelling evidence for resurrection (Wright)
Gospels based on eye witness accounts Death + resurrection of Jesus unexpected in Judaism —> especially as a criminal Unusual reaction —> followers didn’t give up + search for a new messiah (like previously) —> loyalty to Jesus No firm tradition of resurrection/ life after death in Judaism —> dualist- idea that soul and body are different things —> soul could live on without body
34
Life AFTER Life After Death (Wright)
‘Life in a new body’ Bodily resurrection Sudden mutation of Ancient Greek + Jewish belief with Christianity
35
Bodily Resurrection (Wright)
New physical existence in a renewed form Friends couldn’t recognise him His visits were public events He could walk through walls —> but remained human; not a ghost Some people rejected this —> viewed it as a metaphor for return of the nation Israel
36
Life After Life After Death- Impact on Belief (Wright)
Sudden mutation of Ancient Greek + Jewish belief within Christianity Central belief in Christianity —> contrasts the multiple views of Judaism
37
Resurrection Is The Only Option
Unusual to make this claim so it must be real Ockham’s razor —> simplistic answer is the most likely —> Jesus rose form the dead, followers believed this- making him ‘Son of God’
38
Rejection of Naturalistic Explanations of Resurrection- Bad Arguments (Wright)
Jesus swooned- didn’t actually die on the cross (just passed out) —> but… Romans knew how to kill people Followers were mistaken —> common but never results in resurrection claims Pre-scientific explanations —> but… people understood concept that dead people stayed dead at the time Jesus’ grieving followers were having visions/ hallucinations instead of seeing a real man Jesus’ body was stolen —> but… this would have been mentioned
39
Phillipians 1:21-24 - Interpretation of Death
‘My desire to depart and be with Christ is far better’ ‘Living is Christ and dying is gain’ We should not fear death Jesus’ resurrection offers hope of resurrection for all believers To die is to be with Christ —> living on earth is hard; life with Christ is better
40
1 Corinthians 15:12-14 - Interpretation of Death
‘If Christ has not been raised your faith is futile’ Resurrection is a central belief for all Christians —> informs the future event of our own deaths (resurrection) Without resurrection Christian preaching + belief is vain
41
Matthew 10:28 - Interpretation of the Soul
‘Do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul’ Soul is immortal —> cannot be destroyed like physical body —> survives physical death Dualist view —>body +soul are separate —> Greek influence
42
Luke 23:43 - Interpretation of the Soul
‘Today you will be with me in paradise’ *said by Jesus to criminal he as crucified with Immediate presence with God after death Soul can enter Heaven immediately upon death But… No agreement if soul can exist without body
43
John 20-21 - Interpretation of Resurrected Body
‘Although the doors were shut, Jesus came and stood among them and said, ‘Peace be with you’…’ Resurrected body is like earthly body but different —> could walk through walls and doors —> could still be touched by disciples (Thomas) Bodily resurrection —> body vanished form the tomb; needed for resurrection —> on going transformation; tells Mary not to touch him Narrative has chaism structure (ABCBA) (Similar events repeated in reverse order A- indirect belief B- appears to disciples C- encounter with Mary Magdalene B- appearances continue A- encourages belief bad on testimony- gives people Holy Spirit
44
1 Corinthians 15 - Interpretation of Resurrected Body
‘It is sown a physical body, it is raised a spiritual body’ Seed analogy —> earthly body= seed (perishable, mortal, sinful) —> resurrected body= plant (imperishable, powerful, spiritual) —> bodies related but not identical- transformed Resurrection is not resuscitation —> the new spiritual body does not remain the same after resurrection —> new model of existence —> Jesus rescucitated Lazarus’ daughter
45
1 Corinthians 15 - Interpretation of Afterlife
Afterlife wont happen immediately after death —> Christ will return first Christians then resurrected World ends + final Judgement takes place —>God reign over everything Uncertainty —> is resurrection individual or collective? —> just for believers? —> resurrection involves spiritual body as well as soul- doesn’t follow natural laws
46
What is in the Bible?
Tà biblía- (Greek) ‘the books’ Collection of books —> letters/ Gospels/ Acts/ Revelation Old Testament 39 books- Protestant Bibles (same as Jewish scripture; Torah) 46 books- Catholic + Orthodox BIbles- 7 other books are he ‘apocrypha’ (collection of Jewish writing) 1
47
Bible Authority- Protestant View
Sola scriptura Scripture alone is he ultimate authority Bible cannot be wrong —> does not require interpretation
48
Bible Authority- Fundamentalist View
Propositional truth Bible contains literal truths Directly revealed by God through scripture
49
Bible Authority- Conservative Christian View
Prima scriptura Bible is primary authority of faith + practice May require interpretation
50
Bible Authority- Liberal Christian View
Bible inspired by human reflection on God Shaped by historical and cultural context
51
Bible Authority- Catholic View
Bible has authority alongside the magisterium —> teaching authority of church- including Pope
52
Bible as a Source of Moral Advice- 2 Timothy 3:16-17
‘All scripture is God breathed ans is useful for teaching…, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good works’ Bible offers clear moral commands + ethical teachings —> scripture is advice about how to live * Sermon on the mount * Ten Commandments—> form legal/ national systems * ‘turn the other cheek’
53
Bible as a Source of Moral Advice- Ecclesiastes 12:13-14
‘…fear God and keep His commandments, …for God will bring every deed into judgement’ Behave to avoid punishment Deontological ethics —> emphasises duty to obey God’s laws as he judges our actions —> Conservative Christians believe Bible deems what is right and wrong —> Commandments outlined in NT- inc. Jesus’ teachings Difficulty —> Christians may use outdated commandments to respond to moral problems —> eg. Same sex relationships + abortion
54
Bible as a Source of Moral Advice- Luke 3:36-37
‘Be merciful, just as your father is. Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven.’ Appeals to human empathy Compassion + empathy —> BIble is a general example of how to conduct a moral life —> Jesus’ teachings should be mirrored in moral lived of Christians Difficulty —> Bible suits to desire of an individual Christian rather than authority