2.1 | Arguments for the existence of God- Inductive Flashcards
Component 2 | Theme 1 (26 cards)
Cosmos
The universe as a system with an order and harmonious pattern
A posteriori
Based on experience/ empirical evidence
Empirical
Sensory/ physical evidence from within the world
Inductive
Argument constructed on true premises reaching a logically possible and persuasive conclusion
St. Thomas Aquinas’ First Three Ways
- Movement/ Change
- Cause and Effect
- Contingency and Necessity
Infinite Regress
Sequence that can be traced back and back but never comes to an end
Potentiality
The inherent but underdeveloped capabilities and the possibilities of someone/ something for development/ change
Actuality
State of being, the reality of something at this moment of time
Efficient Cause
Activity that brings about changes
Contingent
Dependent upon other things or other circumstances
Necessary Being
A being that is not dependent (independent) on something for in existence
Aquinas’ first way
MOVEMENT + CHANGE
- “Nothing can be reduced by potentiality to actuality; except by something that is in the state of actuality”
- Wood is actually cold but has the potential to become hot- only with heat, this doesn’t happen spontaneously
- There must be a first unmoved mover, there is no such thing as infinite regress - God
Aquinas’ Second Way
CAUSE AND EFFECT
Aquinas’ Third Way
CONTINGENCY AND NECESSITY
The Kalam Argument (William Lane Craig)
Denial of infinite regress
Personal God
Craig’s denial of infinite regress
The universe is finite
the present wouldn’t exist in an infinite
successive additions can’t be added to an infinite; it would then be a potential infintite
Infinite library
Red books = black books is accepted
Red books + black books= red books cannot be accepted
You can’t add to an infinite
Craig’s idea of a personal being
God is an agent of causation
Natural law didn’t exist prior to the universe- so it could have come about naturally
“The cause of the universe must be a personal being who freely chooses to create the universe”
Humes Challenges to Cosmological Argument
Empirical objections
Fallacy of Composition
Anthropomorphite Argument
Critique of Causes
Empirical Objections
Cosmological argument does not use empirical evidence
There does not need to be a first cause- universe could be infinite
Matter could be necessary or eternal
Anthropomorphite Argument
Like causes have like effects
Could the cause of the universe be finite?
Fallacy of composition
What is true for parts doesn’t need to be true for the whole
Just because parts of the universe is caused doesn’t mean the universe is caused
Bertrand Russel- turkey analogy
Critique of Cause
We have never witnessed the universes creation
We don’t know if it was caused
Aquinas’ Teleological Argument
5th way
Qua Purpose
Qua regularity
Qua regularity
Qua- relating to
Regularity of natural bodies
Entity gave it purpose
Requires intellectual supervision
Not luck
Eg. Seasons, orbiting planets, tides