Cohort studies Flashcards

1
Q

Outline cohort study

A

Identify outcome free individuals
Identify exposure
Follow into future to see outcomes (exposed vs unexposed outcomes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Different types of cohort study

A

Concurrent/prospective = find people and data collect in present/later and follow up to future

Retrospective/historical = use health records to start follow up to identify outcomes
data collection starts in past

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Measurements cohort study

A

Incidence rates/rate ratio

Odds ratio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ideal study

A

Compare like with like - everything is the same apart from exposure of interest

Problem is this is virtually impossible - exposure is lined to other factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ideal vs what we can use

A

Ideal = experiment
Next best = randomised control trial (cannot do this due to ethical reasons for smoking for example)
Next best = cohort study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Person years calculation

A

Multiply people studies by the time they were studied for (if all timings same)

If not add up all years each person was studied for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Incidence rate =

A

diseased / person years

diseased in unexposed / person years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Incidence rate ratio =

A

Incidence rate of diseased / incidence rate of diseased in unexposed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

incidence rate example

A

If you followed 3 people for 10 years, person years = 3x10 = 30
if 2 people got asthma it would be 2/30 for incidence rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Calculating error factor

A

e to the power of 2x square root of 1/diseased unexposed + 1/diseased exposed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Confidence interval

A

Incidence rate ratio / EF (lower limit)

Incidence rate ratio x EF (upper limit)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Advantages of cohort study

A

Study exposures and personal characteristics (that are not usually collected)
Obtain more detailed info on outcomes and exposures
Collect additional data on potential confounders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Exposure data can be

A

Binary - yes/no
Several categories
Continuous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Comparisons can be made

A

Internally or externally in cohort study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Internal comparison

A

Comparison of sub-cohorts

Calculate incidence rate ratio and error factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

External comparison

A

Compare with external/reference population
Calculate standardised mortality ratio and error factor

= Observed number of cases / expected number of cases
e to the power of 2x square root of 1/Observed `

17
Q

Calculating expected cases

A

Cohort studies conducted over long time
people age as study continues
Disease rates in population change during study

18
Q

What is Lexis diagram?

A

Calculate expected number of deaths for each age group in each calendar time period

19
Q

Sample size and error factor relationship

A

As sample size increases, error factor decreases (results more reliable/precise)

20
Q

Limitations of external comparison

A
Useful when cannot use sub-cohorts 
But limited data is available 
no incidence data
Use mortality rates instead 
SELECTION BIAS?
SMR well below 100%
21
Q

What will standardised mortality ratio usually be

A

Well below 100% due to healthy worker effect - employment is restricted to healthy individuals so not representative of external population

22
Q

Advantages of concurrent cohort studies

A

detailed assessment of exposure, outcome and confounders

historical not as good at this

23
Q

Advantage of cohort over case control

A

study a range of outcomes (not restricted)
good for studying rare exposure
establish exposure that precedes outcome
good for conditions that fluctuate with age

(NOT AS GOOD FOR RARE OUTCOMES - they just wont happen)

24
Q

Disadvantages cohort study

A

Long time - expensive
Definitions of exposure and outcome = detailed
Risk of loss (survivor bias - those that are left are different)
Results = long time
Not good for rare outcomes
Difficulty with confounding

25
Q

Comparison of cohort studies

A

Internal - incidence rate ratio

External - standardised mortality ratio

26
Q

Cohort studies issues

A

Loss to follow up (survivor bias/differential loss)
Information bias (differential/non differential misclassification)
Confounding
Chance - random error