Section 1 : Social Influence - Minority Influence and Social Change Flashcards

1
Q

What would happen if everyone went along with the majority

A

Nothing would change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What gains influence and changes the way the majority thinks

A

Small minorities and even individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What type of conformity is involved in minority influence

A

Internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Minority influence is stronger if the the minority is….

A

Consistent
Flexible
Committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Moscovici et al (1969)

A

Research into minority influence that compared inconsistent minorities with consistent minorities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What type of experiment was Moscovici et al (1969)

A

Laboratory experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the characteristics of he participants

A

192 women

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the task of Moscovici et al (1969)

A

In groups of 6, participants judged the colour of 36 slides.
All slides were blue but the brightness of blue varied on each slide.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Were there confederates

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How many confederates were there in each group

A

2 out of 6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the confederates job

A

In one condition, confederates called all 36 slides ‘green’ (consistent)
In another condition, confederates called 24 of the slides ‘green’ and 12 ‘blue’ (inconsistent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Was there a control group

A

Yes, it contained no confederates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the results in the control group of Moscovici (1969)

A

Participants called the slides ‘green’ 0.25% of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the results in the consistent condition

A

8.4% of the time participants adopted the minority position and called the slides ‘green’
32% of participants called slides ‘green’ at least once

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the results of the inconsistent condition

A

The participants moved to the minority position of calling the slides green only 1.25% of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the conclusion of Moscovici et al

A

The confederates were in the minority but their views appear to have been influenced the real participants. The use of the two conditions illustrates that the minority had more influence when they were consistent in calling the slides ‘green”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the evaluation of Moscovici et al (1969)

A

-Lacks ecological validity due to it being a lab experiment because task was artificial
-Participants may have felt that judging the colour of was trivial may have acted differently if principles were involved
-Study was carried out on women - results cannot be generalised to men
-We know that participants were actually influenced by the minority rather than being independently unsure of the colour slide - this is the significance of control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was Nemeth et al (1974)

A

A repeated Moscovici experiment but instructed participants to answer with all of the colours they saw in the slide, rather than a single colour. For example, they could answer ‘green-blue’ rather than ‘green’

19
Q

What were the three variation Nemeth (1974)

A

Where confederates:
1) said all of the slides were green
2) said the slides were ‘green’ or ‘green-blue’ at random
3) said the brighter slides were ‘green-blue’ and the duller slides were ‘green’ or vice versa

20
Q

What happened when the confederates said ‘green’ or varied their response (inconsistent)

A

They had no effect on the participants responses.

21
Q

What happened when where the confederates responses varied with a feature of the slide (brightness)

A

It had a significant effect on the participants responses

22
Q

What was the conclusion of Nemeth et al (1974)

A

The confederates had most influence when they were consistent but flexible- Nemeth proposed that rigid consistency wasn’t effective because it seemed unrealistic when more subtle responses were allowed

23
Q

What does Moscovici’s conversion theory suggest

A

That majority and minority influence are different processes

24
Q

What is the process of majority influence

A

-People compare behaviour to majority and change behaviour to fit in without considering majority views in detail
-So majority influence involves compliance - it doesn’t always cause people to change their private feelings just their behaviour

25
Q

What is the process of Minority influence

A

-When a minority is consistent people may examine the minority’s belief in detail because they want to understand why the minority sees things differently
-Can lead people to privately accept the minority view - they convert to the minority position
-social pressure to conform may mean their behaviour doesn’t actually change at least at first

26
Q

what does consistency show according to Moscovici and the factors that enable minority influence to occur

A

consistentcy shows commitement

27
Q

what can minority views initially be seen as

A

wrong, because they don’t match with what is considered the norms

28
Q

what is effect of consistency on minority influence

A

consistency shows commitment and the minority isnt willing to compromise, this creates a conflict - when your faced with a consistent majority you consider whether they might be right and if you should change your view

29
Q

what does Moscovici call the validation process

A

process when you are faced with a consistent majority and you seriously consider whether they may be right and if you should change your view

30
Q

what happens if there’s no reason to dismiss minority views

A

then you begin to see things as the minority does

31
Q

who created the social impact theory

A

Latane and Wolf

32
Q

what did latane and wolf argue

A

they argued that social influence occurs when the combined effect of three factors are significant enough

33
Q

what were the three factors discussed in the social impact theory

A

Strength
Numbers
Immediacy

34
Q

what does strength refer to

A

how powerful, knowledgeable and consistent the group appear to be

35
Q

what does numbers refer to

A

how many people are in the group

36
Q

what does immediacy refer to

A

how close the source of influence is to you (physically or relationship)

37
Q

how does minority influence happen according to latane and wolf

A

through the same process as majority influence - its just the balance of factors that create the social influence that’s different

38
Q

how can a minority exert social influence

A

the numbers may be small
but the minority strength and immediacy

39
Q

how does a majority iexert social infleunce

A

the numbers are big
so strength and immediacy isnt needed as much as minority influence

40
Q

how do minorities become majorities

A

through the snowball effect

41
Q

what is the snowball effect

A

people need to go from privately accepting the minority to publicly accepting it

42
Q

what is social cryptoamnesia

A

the public opinion changes gradually over time until the minority view is accepted as the norm, but people forget where the view originally came from

43
Q

give examples of minorities changing them public opinion

A

Martin Luther King Jr.
Gay Rights Movements