Section 3 : Attachment - Effects of Institutionalism Flashcards

1
Q

What is privation

A

Where a child has never had an attachment to its mother or caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is deprivation

A

Where an attachment was once formed but now is broken

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who criticised the maternal deprivation hypothesis

A
  • Rutter
  • said Bowlby was confused with the term deprivation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Rutter claim and where did evidence of this come from

A
  • That the effects of maternal privation are more likely to be serious than the effects of maternal deprivation
  • evidence comes from case studies of children who suffered difficult conditions or cruel treatment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was Curtiss 1977

A
  • case of a girl who suffered extreme cruelty from her parents and never formed any attachments
  • she was beaten, no chance to play with toys, strapped to a high chair most of her childhood
  • discovered at 13 years old physically underdeveloped, only speak with animal-like sounds
  • social and intellectual skills never seemed to fully develop
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the method Rutter et al 2007

A
  • 111 Romanian orphans who were adopted by British families were compared with a group 52 UK adoptees and followed over a prolonged period
  • some orphans were adopted before they were 6 months and some were older than 6 months
  • each child was assessed at ages 4,6,11
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the results of Rutter et al 2007

A
  • Romanian children who were younger than 6 months when they were adopted had same level of emotional development as other UK children who were adopted at the same age
  • However Romanian orphans who were older than 6 months at adoption showed signs of insecure attachments and social problems
  • the UK children who were older than 6 months at adoption didn’t show the same problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the conclusion of Rutter et al 2007

A
  • effects of privation can be reversed if attachment starts to form before the age of 6 months
  • long term effects are more permanent if attachment doesn’t start to occur within 6 months
  • maternal deprivation on its own doesn’t cause permanent effects because the UK adopted children had been separated but didn’t show any problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the evaluations of Rutter et al 2007

A
  • results with older children may be due to a lack of any stimulation in the orphanage
  • longitudinal study so the results provide a better insight into the long term effects of privation
  • however they collected mainly qualitative data which is more difficult to create generalised laws or theories from
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Rutter et al’s research was built upon what

A

Hodges and Tizard 1989

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the method of Hodges and Tizard

A
  • longitudinal study
  • studied 65 children placed in a residential nursery before they were 4 months old
  • they hadn’t the opportunity to form close attachments with any of their caregivers
  • by the age of 4 some of the children had returned to their birth mother, some had been adopted and some stayed in the nursery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the results of Hodges and Tizard 1989

A
  • at 16 years old, the adopted group had strong family relationships although a control group of the children from a normal home environment had a weaker peer relationship
  • those who stayed in the nursery or who returned to their mothers showed poorer relationships with family and peers than those who were adopted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the conclusion of Hodges and Tizard 1989

A

Children can recover from early maternal privation if they are in a good quality, loving environment, although their social development may not be as good as children who have never suffered privation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Give the evaluations of Hodges and Tizard 1989

A
  • natural experiment, high ecological validity
  • sample quite small and more than 20 of the children couldn’t be found at the end of the study
  • hard to generalise results
  • lack of stimulation due to lots of institutionalised children are often underfed and malnourished
  • these factors could influence their behaviour rather than lack of attachment itself
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Long term effects of institutionalisation includes….

A
  • affectionless psychopathy
  • anaclitic depression (involving appetite loss, sleeplessness, impaired social and intellectual growth)
  • deprivation dwarfism (infants are physically underdeveloped due to emotional deprivation)
  • delinquency (minor crimes committed by youths)
  • reduced intelligence (infants dont develop intellectually as fast as their peers)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly