social influence Flashcards
internalisation
going along with others as their point of view is consistent with yours
private and public acceptance of group’s opinion
compliance
going along with others to gain approval / avoid disapproval
little or no private attitude change
identification
we identify with a group, so want to be part of it
we publicly change our behaviour to be part of it, even if privately we disagree
it is often temporary
normative social influence
you conform as you want to be liked or respected by the group and because of the desire to ‘fit in’
evaluation for normative social influence
asch - when answers were written down - conformity dropped to 12.5%
schultz et al - 25% reduction in need for fresh towels when told 75% of guests reuse
informational social influence
you confirm as you believe the group has superior knowledge to you and is therefore right
evaluation for informational
lucas et al - greater conformity to incorrect maths answers when problems we difficult
asch - aim
to investigate the effects of conformity to a majority, when the task is unambiguous
asch - procedure
123 male undergraduates from us
one naive pp and group of 6-8 confederates
shown 2 white cards, one with a single line
other with three lines of various lengths
asked which line is same length
asch findings
control trials - in ordinary circumstances people made mistakes 1% of the time
critical trails - pp gave incorrect answers 36.8% of the time, 75% conformed at least once
asch conclusion
showed convincingly that group pressures to conform to a majority are much stronger than been thought previously
variations of asch - group size
1 confederate conformity was 3%
2 confederates was 12.8%
3 confederates was 32%
conformity is highest when the majority is only 3
variations of asch - task difficulty
if the task is made more ambiguous then conformity increases - probably due to informational social influence
variations of asch - unanimity
when a confederate gives the correct answer, conformity dropped to 5% - if they gave a different incorrect answer to the majority it dropped to 9%
asch evaluation - ethics
participants were deliberately deceived as they were told it was a vision test - study would have lacked validity if the aim was known
some felt stressed and underwent psychological harm although asch argued he interviewed them after to overcome this
asch evaluation - ethnocentric
perrin and spencer - replicated with british students and only 1 in 396 conformed
asch evaluation - sample
a bias sample of 50 american students was used
we cannot generalise to other cultures or to women - lacks population validity