Evaluation of Personality as a risk factor for addiction Flashcards

1
Q

AO3 - what research study?

A

P - research has suggested a r/ship between personality disorder and addiction.

E - Verheul et al (1995) - completed a review of research into this area and discovered personality disorders were apparent in 44% of alcoholics and 70% in cocaine addicts, 79% for opiate addiction.

E - They also suggested they were even more common for polydrug users. they shows a correlation between drug addiction and having a personality disorder.

L - this suggests that the development of a personality disorder may link to the development of the addiction. however, we could say that the addiction causes the personality and not the other way around.

  • Verheul et al (1995)
  • 44% - alc
  • 70% - cocaine
  • 79% - opioids
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

AO3 - Another Research study?

A

P - A research study conducted by Cao and Su (2006) used a vlounteer sample of 2620 high school kids from 4 schools.

E - the pt’s completed several surveys measuring personality varibles (EPQ). they were aged between 12 - 18, with a mean age of 15. 64 students were diagnosed as sufferring from internet addiction, this equated to a prevelance of 2.4%. The group had a significanlty higher rating scores of neuoticism and psychotism than comparison groups.

E - In conclusion, the prevelance of internet addiction in children/adolscents is concerning and appears psychological varibles can largely explain this issue.

  • Cao and Su (2006)
  • volunteer sample
  • 2620
  • 4 schools
  • EPQ
  • 12 - 18
  • 15
  • 64
  • 2.4%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A03 - A negative?

A

P - A lot of this research can be seen as just correlational.

E - For example, we can’t conclude that neurotiscism causes addiction issues, as the research evidence only suggests a r/ship between the 2 factors.

E - Teeson (2002) also argued a large amount of the research to support this risk factor just implies a correlation, not neccassirly causation.

L - this suggests that we can’t infer cause and effects.

  • neurotiscism
  • Teeson (2002)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly