17. Ethics Flashcards

(14 cards)

1
Q

Why are ethics an important issue in Psychology

A
  • Psychological research & practice should aim to improve our self-understanding, be beneficial to ppl & try to improve the quality of life of individuals.
  • As professionals, psychologists are expected to do their work in an ETHICAL MANNER.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is The British Psychological Society (BPS)

A
  • The BPS has developed ethical guidelines for psychologists to follow when theyre designing studies, so that P’s are protected.
  • They are formal principles for what is considered to be acceptable or unacceptable, & include advice on deception, consent, & psychological harm.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What 5 principles are outlined in The BPS

A
  1. Informed consent
  2. Deception
  3. Protection from harm
  4. Debriefing
  5. Confidentiality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

INFORMED CONSENT

A
  • BPS state P’s should always give informed consent.
  • told aims & nature of study before agreeing to it.
  • know they have the right to withdraw at any time.
  1. U16’s cannot legally give consent (parent can).
  2. Consent not obtained in naturalistic observation. Acceptable provided its done in public location where ppl would expect to be observed.
  3. Still issues when consent is obtained. Menges (1973) reviewed 1000 American studies - found that 97% had not given ppl all info abt the research.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

DECEPTION

A
  • If P’s have been deceived then they cannot have given informed consent.
  • HOWEVER, sometimes researchers must withhold information abt study bc P’s wouldn’t behave naturally if they knew the aim.
  1. BPS state deception is ONLY ACCEPTABLE if theres strong scientific justification for the research & theres no alternative procedure available.
  2. Severity of deception differs, eg. research on memory may involve unexpected memory tests (that P’s weren’t informed abt). This is less objectionable than the deception involved in Milgram’s study.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

PROTECTION FROM HARM

A
  • BPS state the risk of harm to P’s should be no greater than they would face in their normal lives. Hard to accurately assess this.
  1. Research procedures can involve physical & psychological discomfort (eg. P’s in Milgram’s research suffered extreme distress).
  2. Some face risks in their work (eg. soldiers), but that doesnt mean they can be exposed to risks in research.
  3. Researchers dont always known in advance what might be distressing for P’s.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

DEBRIEFING

A
  • Debriefing is supposed to return P’s to state they were in before the research.
  • Especially important if deception has been used.
  1. Researchers must fully explain what research involved & what the results might show.
  2. P’s are given the right to withdraw their data.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CONFIDENTIALITY

A
  • None of P’s in a study should be identifiable from any reports produced.
  1. Data collected must be confidential - cant use ppl’s names in reports.
  2. P’s must be warned if their data is not going to be completely anonymous.
  3. HOWEVER, some groups or ppl might be easily identifiable from their characteristics - more so if report says when/where study was conducted.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What ethical issues to researchers have to deal with in their studies

A
  • Deception
  • Consent
    (ALSO - Animal rights)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ethical issues researchers have to deal with in their studies: DECEPTION

A
  • Sometimes it’s difficult to conduct meaningful research w/o slight deception - if P’s know exactly what’s being studied, behaviour might change –> data obtained would be useless.
  • Psychologists dont usually tell P’s every detail, but do try minimise deception. That way P’s arent likely to be upset when they find out the true nature of the study.
  • Milgrams experiment is an eg of a study that would not be considered ethical today - deceived P’s & many showed signs of stress.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ethical issues researchers have to deal with in their studies: CONSENT

A
  • Gaining consent is central to conducing research ethically. But telling P’s theyre being observed could change the way they behave
  • Milgrams P’s couldn’t give informed consent until after they were debriefed. If they’d known abt the nature of the suited, it wouldn’t have worked.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

SUPPORT for use of animals in research

A
  • Argued that animal research has provided valuable information for psychological & medical research.
  • Some experimental designs couldn’t have been conducted on humans - eg. Harlow’s study on attachment - young monkeys separated from their mothers & reared alone.
  • Some argue its acceptable to experiment on animals far less developed than humans.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

AGAINST the use of animals in research

A
  • May argue it’s ethically wrong to inflict harm & suffering on animals, & obviously animals cant give consent to take part.
  • Some argue it’s cruel to experiment on animals that have a similar intelligence to humans, bc they may suffer the same problems we would.
  • The supporting argument that its acceptable to experiment on animals far less developed than humans is COUNTERED by the view that there would be no point bc they’ll be too different from humans to give results that apply to us.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

HOWEVER, ethical guidelines dont solve all the problems (issues with ethical guidelines)

A
  1. May be researchers who dont follow the guidelines properly.
  2. If psychologist conducts research in an unacceptable way, although they’d most likely be kicked out of their uni, they cant be banned from research (unlike doctor who can be fired for misconduct).
  3. Even when followed, it can be difficult to assess things like psychological harm, or to fully justify the use of deception.
  4. Deciding whether the ends (benefits from study) justify the means (cost of study) is not straightforward either. Creates another dilemma for psychologists.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly