Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Louisiana Bar Exam July 2023- Created By Maryclaire Farrington > 24. Constitutional Law > Flashcards

24. Constitutional Law Flashcards

1
Q

Establishment Clause

A

Under the Establishment Clause, government action that PREFERS ONE RELIGIOUS SECT OVER OTHERS violates the First Amendment unless the action is necessary to achieve a compelling interest.

More broadly, the current approach to the Establishment Clause compels the government to pursue a course of neutrality toward religion, and it prohibits the government from directly or indirectly coercing individuals to exercise (or refrain from exercising) their religion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Establishment Clause Test

A

TEST: Whether government action that is not neutral is nonetheless permissible depends on whether it accords with history and the understanding of the Founders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Free Exercise Clause

A

The Free Exercise Clause forbids the enactment of laws or other state actions that PROHIBIT the free exercise of religion or PUNISH someone on the basis of that person’s religious beliefs.

If a regulation is targeted to a particular religious belief or expression, meaning that the purpose of the government’s action is to negatively affect a particular type of conduct because that conduct is dictated by a religious belief, such a regulation will not be upheld unless the government can show a compelling state interest under the strict scrutiny test.

GOV HAS TO BE NEUTRAL TOWARDS RELIGION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Limitations on Judicial Power

A

CRAMPS-11

  1. Case and Controversy
  2. Ripeness and Concreteness
  3. Abstention on Constitutional Issues
  4. Mootness
  5. Political Questions
  6. Standing
  7. 11th Am. and Sovereign Immunity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Case and Controversy Requirement

A

prohibits advisory opinions where actual controversies may not exist

does not prohibit declaratory judgments where controversy does exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Standing

A

plaintiff must have a personal stake in the outcome of the case that is likely to be redressed by the relief sought

injury must be distinct and palpable and must be fairly traceable to the alleged conduct (sufficient threat is ok)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Taxpayer Standing

A

Flast v. Cohen double nexus test:
(i) logical nexus between taxpayer status and TYPE of legislation attacked
(ii) nexus between taxpayer status and the NATURE of the constitutional infringement alleged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Citizen Standing

A

generally mere status as a citizen does not confer standing

requires that plaintiff allege some particular injury connected to his status as a citizen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mootness

A

case is moot when controversy ceases to exist or plaintiff obtains relief sought after filing suit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Exceptions to Mootness Requirement

A
  1. Recurring but Evading Review
  2. Voluntary Acquiescence (D voluntarily ceases – not automatically moot, D has burden to show it is unlikely challenged conduct will recur)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ripeness and Concreteness

A
  • threat cannot be merely hypothetical (need substantial likelihood that statute will be enforced/ prosecution will be undertaken)
  • adverse positions concretely fixed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Political Questions

A

function of separation of powers (won’t review policy decisions of other branches)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Powell Test for Political Questions

A

POWELL TEST:
(i) is there a “textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the issue to a coordinate political department of government”?
(ii) if so, what is the scope of the commitment?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

11th Amendment

A

there shall be no suit by citizens against any state in federal court for damages (can sue officials for conduct)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ex Parte Young Doctrine

A

federal court can enjoin state action that violates the federal constitution or federal law on the theory that unconstitutional action ceases to be legitimate state action (UNCONSTITUTIONAL action is not legit state action)

does NOT apply to violation of state law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Abstention from Constitutional Issues

A

court should dispose of issues in a case on non-constitutional grounds when possible

court decides dispositive unsettled state law question, abstains from deciding the constitutional issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Unconstitutional Violation of Separation of Powers

A
  1. where there is no constitutional authorization/ action exceeds authorization
  2. usurpation of power granted to other branch
  3. improper delegation of one branch to another
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Scope of Executive Power

A

Article II

if congress agrees = SCOTUS reviews broadly
if congress does NOT agree = reviews narrowly

  • sign/ veto legislation (no line item veto)
  • pardons
  • treaties (senate approval)
  • appoint ambassadors/ judges/ officers (senate approval)
  • convene special sessions of Congress
  • enforce/ execute laws
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Scope of Legislative Power

A
  • taxing and spending clause
  • regulate interstate commerce
  • declare war
  • raise/ support armies/ provide navy (limited by Appropriations Clause)
  • NECESSARY AND PROPER
  • no federal “police power”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Legislative Commerce Power

A
  • Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states.
  • Federal regulation must be a necessary and proper exercise of that power.

Federal regulation is permitted even if the activity merely “affects” interstate commerce. CANNOT BE PURELY LOCAL/ CANNOT COMPEL ACTIVITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Legislative Taxing and Spending Power

A

Congress the power to tax and to spend for the payment of national debts and for the general welfare.

A tax that seriously and unnecessarily burdens a fundamental right, therefore, may be unconstitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Regulating Through Taxing and Spending

A

Can regulate through taxing and spending – “penalty” can be a tax

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Is it a tax?

A

determination of whether a law passed by Congress imposes a tax does not depend on the label given to it by Congress, but rather on its function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Congress’s Delegation of Power

A

Legislative delegation of power to judicial/ executive branch is only permissible if it includes SUFFICIENT STANDARDS (can be judged for fidelity to legislative will).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Review of Congress’s Delegation of Power

A

Where there is a broad congressional delegation on a “major question,” the Court will examine whether the agency has

historically asserted such power

and whether there is clear congressional authorization for the power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

10th Amendment

A

= source of state powers

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Supremacy Clause

A

Constitution/ federal laws = supreme law of the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Preemption

A

State action or legislation is “preempted” by federal legislation if there is complete preemption or if there is a “collision” between the two. (Gibbons)

STATES CAN LEGISLATE WITHIN THE GAPS

Either FIELD preemption or CONFLICT preemption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Field Preemption

A
  • fed scheme so pervasive there is a reasonable inference Congress left NO ROOM for states to supplement it
  • fed legislation in a field in which the federal interest is so dominant that the federal system will be assumed to preclude enforcement of state laws
    • object and character reveals dominant federal interest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Conflict Preemption

A

the state policy may produce a result inconsistent with the objective of the federal statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Dormant Commerce Clause

A

whether a state’s action burdens the flow of interstate commerce

and thereby unconstitutionally interferes with the federal commerce power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Pike Balancing Test

A

= determines whether state laws place UNDUE burdens on interstate commerce (and thus unconstitutional)

balance degree of burden against the importance of the state interest being promoted by the state law or action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Dormant Commerce Clause Burdens:

state’s interest in health and safety

A

sufficiently important to justify burden

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Dormant Commerce Clause Burdens:

attempts to regulate businesses operating in other states

A

state CANNOT pass law that attempts to regulate businesses operating in other states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Dormant Commerce Clause Burdens:

discriminates interstate commerce in favor of intrastate

A

almost always invalid regardless of purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Dormant Commerce Clause Burdens:

primary purpose to protect/ promote state’s economic interest

A

not sufficient (even if it claims to promise health/ safety)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Dormant Commerce Clause Burdens:

if there is a less burdensome alternative available

A

burden not upheld

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

DCC Analysis

A

a. Does the law discriminate against interstate commerce?
b. If not, does the law burden interstate commerce?
1. How substantial is the burden?
2. What is the purpose of the law?
3. Is the law’s purpose important enough to justify the burden?
4. Is there a less burdensome alternative?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Governmental Market Participation Exception for DCC

A

State and local governments are not restricted by the Commerce Clause when they act as market “participants” rather than as market “regulators.”

LIMIT: Can’t use to regulate downstream market

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Privileges and Immunities Clause

A

“The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.”

Only applies to FUNDAMENTAL privileges and immunities

DOES NOT APPLY TO ALIENS/ NONCITIZENS/ CORPORATIONS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Fundamental Privileges and Immunities

A
  • right to travel
  • right to own property
  • right to transact business/ carry on a trade

NOT hunting licenses/ recreational activities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

When may state discriminate against nonresident with respect to a fundamental protected right?

A

only where

its reasons are “substantial” and

the difference in treatment bears a close relationship to the reasons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Limits on State Taxation

A

A state’s power of taxation may be limited by:

(i) the Commerce Clause,
(ii) the 14th Amendment,
(iii) the Privileges and Immunities Clause, and
(iv) the Import-Export Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Commerce Clause Limits on State Taxes

A

State taxation that unduly burdens or discriminates against interstate commerce violates the Commerce Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Privileges and Immunities Clause Limits on State Taxes

A

The right to pursue one’s trade is protected by the Privileges and Immunities Clause.

If a state tax restricts access to a protected privilege or immunity and is discriminatory against citizens of other states, it is unconstitutional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

14th Amendment Limits on State Taxes

A
  • Due Process Clause (no minimum contacts OR multiple taxation = violates DPC)
  • Equal Protection Clause (classification must be rational - state gets broad discretion)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Import-Export Clause Limits on State Taxes

A

a state may not impose “imposts or duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing its inspection laws”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Contract Clause

A

prohibits retroactive impairment of existing contracts

DOES NOT APPLY TO INVALIDATE STATE LAW THAT ONLY HAS INDIRECT EFFECTS ON CONTRACTS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

a state may not pass a law to ___ its ____ contractual obligations

A

a state may not pass a law to undo its own contractual obligations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

a state may not pass a law that retroactively effects a severe change in contractual circumstances unless . . .

A

the law is necessary to serve an important and legitimate public interest
OR
to address a broad economic or social problem

51
Q

Contract Clause: Private K

A

prohibits only SUBSTANTIAL IMPAIRMENTS of contractual obligations for private contracts

52
Q

Contract Clause: Burden for Government for Private K Regulation

A

If it is a substantial impairment,

  • must serve important and legitimate public interest and
  • is reasonably and narrowly tailored to promote that interest
53
Q

Contract Clause: Public K

A

a state or political subdivision cannot legislate to reduce or “undo” its own contractual obligations

54
Q

Contract Clause: Exceptions (Public K)

A

where the state has reserved to itself the power to revoke, alter, or amend a contract in the contract itself, a statute or other law,

or when the law is narrowly tailored to serve another legitimate public interest

55
Q

5th Amendment

A

= takings clause

private property shall NOT be taken for public use,
without just compensation

56
Q

Takings Analysis

A
  1. Was there a taking? (not merely regulating land use)
  2. Was the taking for a public purpose? (if no = return of property / if yes = only remedy is “just compensation”)
  3. What constitutes “just compensation”?
57
Q

Taking

A
  • a physical occupation of property by the state or condemnation of property
  • the denial of all rights in land or substantially all use of land

REDUCTION OF GOV BENEFITS = NOT A TAKING

58
Q

Zoning and Takings

A

MERE IMPAIRMENT (ZONING) IS NOT A TAKING UNLESS IT DENIES THE OWNER SUBSTANTIALLY ALL USES OF THE PROPERTY

59
Q

Reduction of Governemnt Benefits and Takings

A

REDUCTION OF GOV BENEFITS = NOT A TAKING

60
Q

Taking: Substantial Regulations that Impair Use of Property

A
  • substantial regulation closely related to substantial public purpose = NOT a taking
  • substantial regulation not closely related to public purpose = MAY be a taking
61
Q

Taking: Public Purpose Requirements

A
  • must be CLOSELY RELATED to the state regulation
  • public purpose so long as government reasonably believes that the taking will benefit the public, even if the public benefit is part of a redevelopment plan for economic revitalization
62
Q

Standard to Challenge Public Purpose Classification

A
  • states get WIDE LATITUDE
  • determination that it is a public purpose will not be disturbed unless palpably without reasonable foundation
63
Q

Just Compensation

A
  • ordinarily money damages
  • calculation begins at time use was denied (e.g. date of moratorium)
64
Q

State Action

A

AFFIRMATIVE STATE INVOLVEMENT NECESSARY
- state passes law
- leasing public property to private party
- encourages unconstitutional private action
- judicial enforcement

NOT: permission of private action/ granting of license

65
Q

14th Amendment

A

“no STATE shall” deprive any person of due process or equal protection of the laws

the plaintiff must allege and prove some “state action” in connection with the deprivation of due process or equal protection

66
Q

Procedural Due Process Elements

A
  1. The presence of state action;
  2. An adverse effect on a recognized liberty or property interest; AND,
  3. Notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard.
67
Q

Property Interest

A

must be a vested property right by law or otherwise

tenure ok; temp emp not

68
Q

Matthews Factors

A

determines nature/ timing of required notice and opportunity to be heard … CONSIDER:

  1. the private interest that will be affected by the official action
  2. risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value of additional procedural safeguards
  3. government’s interest (including fiscal/administrative burdens)
69
Q

Factors to Determine how much Process is Due

A

a. Are common law safeguards adequate to protect the right, or is additional process needed?

b. Is a pre-deprivation hearing necessary to provide a check against some substantial loss to the individual?

c. Will the requested procedures substantially reduce the risk of an erroneous deprivation of a right?

d. Has there been an historical incidence of abuse of these rights?

70
Q

Substantive Due Process

A

prohibits depriving a person of life, liberty, or property without due process of the law

5th = fed gov
14th = state gov

if you win you STOP the state action

71
Q

State Laws Regulating Business Operations

A

valid so long as the regulations imposed are rationally related to legitimate gov’t interest

broad discretion to state

72
Q

Punitive Damages Violation of DPC

A

award will violate the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment if it is “grossly excessive” in relation to state interests in punishing/ deterring

Court examines:

  • the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant’s conduct,
  • the ratio between the compensatory damages and the punitive damages and
  • the difference between the punitive damages award and the criminal or civil sanctions that could be imposed for comparable misconduct

10x actual damages = constitutionally excessive

73
Q

Privacy / Personal Rights

A

laws that infringe upon “fundamental rights” may be invalid under the Due Process Clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendments

74
Q

“Right to Privacy”

A
  • marriage
  • same-sex marriage
  • procreation
  • family relationships
  • consensual gay sexual relations
75
Q

Test for Privacy Rights

A

The Constitution can protect rights NOT specifically enumerated in its text or in the Bill of Rights if a right is

deeply rooted in the nation’s history and tradition
and is essential to the concept of ordered liberty. [Dobbs]

76
Q

State Regulation of a Fundamental Right

A

SUBJECT TO STRICT SCRUTINY

regulation MUST
- serve a compelling state interest, and
- be narrowly drawn so as to accomplish the compelling state interest with as little interference as possible with the fundamental right

77
Q

Right to Travel

A

fundamental right

  • a classification deemed to “penalize” a person who exercises his or her right of interstate migration = violation if no compelling state interest
78
Q

Right to Vote

A
  • severe restriction = strict scrutiny
  • reasonable non-discriminatory restriction = sufficiently justified by an IMPORTANT state interest
  • implied right to have one’s vote count EQUALLY
79
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

narrowly tailored to fulfill a compelling state interest

80
Q

Limits on Campaign Contributions

A

intermediate scrutiny

“closely drawn” to match a “sufficiently important” state interest

81
Q

Limits on Campaign Contributions: Your Own Campaign

A

cannot be limited

82
Q

Limits on Campaign Contributions: Someone Else’s Campaign

A

can be limited

83
Q

Limits on Campaign Contributions: Someone Else’s Campaign - Indirect Expenditures

A

cannot limit indirect expenditures – corporations can spend as much as they want to get someone elected

84
Q

Right of Access to Ballot

A

restrictions on candidate qualifications must be narrowly tailored to serve compelling state interest

strict scrutiny

85
Q

Right to Bear Arms

A

2nd/ 14th Amendment

special standard of review = within the nation’s “historical tradition of firearm regulation” with particular attention given to the practices in place at the time that the relevant amendments were adopted (i.e. 18/19th century) = LIMITS MUST BE HISTORICALLY BASED

86
Q

Fundamental Rights

A
  • privacy rights (marriage/ homo sex/ procreation)
  • right to travel
  • right to vote
  • right to bear arms
  • free speech
  • NOT education
87
Q

Equal Protection

A

Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the 5th Amendment prohibit the denial of equal protection of the laws

APPLIES WHEN PERSONS ARE PUT IN DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATIONS BY A LAW

88
Q

Degree of Scrutiny Considerations

A

depends on whether a classification is characterized as:
(a) burdensome to constitutionally protected rights,
(b) inherently suspect,
(c) quasi-suspect, or
(d) neither burdensome nor suspect

89
Q

Level of scrutiny for classifications that are burdensome to constitutionally protected rights

A

strict scrutiny

narrowly tailored to fulfill a compelling state interest

90
Q

Level of scrutiny for classifications that are inherently suspect

A

strict scrutiny

narrowly tailored to fulfill a compelling state interest

91
Q

Level of Scrutiny for quasi-suspect classifications

A

subject-by-subject basis

Generally classification must be substantially related to an important government interest (intermediate scrutiny)

92
Q

Level of scrutiny for neither burdensome nor suspect classifications

A

minimal scrutiny RATIONAL BASIS

classification bear some rational relationship to a legitimate governmental interest

93
Q

Suspect Classifications (3 Kinds)

A

(1) classifications that are facially discriminatory

(2) classifications that are discriminatory in their application (or that have a discriminatory impact)

(3) classifications that have a discriminatory motive

94
Q

Facially Discriminatory Classification

A

one that makes an explicit distinction between classes of persons

considered inherently suspect, and will seldom, if ever, be upheld

95
Q

Facially Neutral / Discriminatory Application Classification

A

discriminatory impact, by itself, is not enough to render the classification suspect

classifications that are discriminatory in their application must also be shown to have a discriminatory motive or purpose to be considered suspect

96
Q

Classifications of Race and Natural Origin

A

MOST RIGID SCRUTINY

must be shown to be necessary to the accomplishment of some compelling state objective, independent of the social discrimination which it was the object of the 14th Amendment to eliminate

97
Q

Discriminatory Purpose Burden

A

satisfied by showing that the legislation was intended to work to the disadvantage of a particular racial group

98
Q

Affirmative Action

A

OLD LAW CHANGED BY VERY RECENT CASE

  • race or sex may be considered to cure prior discrimination against, or under representation of, an identifiable minority group
  • plan must be narrowly tailored
  • no inflexible quotas / no blind numerical system
  • must be ONE FACTOR of many considered
  • states can prohibit affirmative action
99
Q

Classification of Alienage

A

state/ local = strict scrutiny

federal = rational basis

100
Q

Classification of Gender

A

“stiff intermediate”

closely reviewed and will not be upheld if they reflect “the baggage of sexual stereotypes”

separate but equal educational institutions are not permitted

101
Q

Classification of Illegitimacy

A

“intermediate lite”

Court looks to the purpose behind the classification, and will not uphold classifications intended to punish the offspring of illicit relationships

102
Q

Minimal Scrutiny / Rational Basis

A

2-step analysis:

(a) what is the purpose of the classification; and
(b) is there some connection between the classification and the purpose?

classification need not be the best method for promoting the state’s interest nor completely solve the problem

WEALTH/ AGE

103
Q

Content Regulation of Speech

A

impermissible content regulation either punishes one type of speech over others, or seeks to regulate based on the “message” contained in the speech

104
Q

Exceptions to Content Regulation of Speech

A
  • advocating lawless conduct
  • false/ deceptive commercial speech
  • public EEs in some circumstances
  • obscenity
  • fighting words
105
Q

Political Speech

A

highest level of protection - may not regulate unless the regulation is narrowly tailored to serve a state interest of the highest order

EXCEPTION: speech advocating lawless conduct (must be at least some possibility that the speech will result in the illegal conduct advocated)

106
Q

Speech Advocating Lawless Conduct

A

Brandenburg Test:
Gov can regulate if speech is:
a) Directed to imminent lawless action AND
b) Likely to incite or produce such action (SILLA Factors)

107
Q

Likelihood Factors for Speech Advocating Lawless Conduct

A

Likelihood factors (SILLA):
- seriousness of advocated conduct
- influence of speaker
- listeners
- location of speech
- aggravating circumstances increasing likelihood of violence

108
Q

Commercial Speech Test

A

Court tolerates greater restrictions on commercial speech than other speech when the restriction is necessary to promote a substantial state interest, and provided there is a “reasonable fit” between the regulation and the state interest at stake

subject to reasonable restrictions as to the time, place and manner of the speech

FULL PROTECTION WHEN CORP ENGAGES IN POLITICAL SPEECH

109
Q

Public EE’s Free Speech Rights

A

1) The speech must relate to a matter of “PUBLIC CONCERN” – speech that relates solely to private interests is not protected in the public workplace

2) if public concern - gov must show that its interest in efficiently delivering public services outweighs the employee’s free speech rights

3) OR gov can show that a negative employment decision would have been reached anyway for reasons unrelated to the employee’s speech

110
Q

Obscenity

A

not protected by 1st amendment

Miller Test:
a) The work must be such that “the average person applying contemporary community standards” would find that, taken as a whole, it appeals to the prurient interest

b) The work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by state law; and

c) The work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value

111
Q

Fighting Words

A

not protected by 1st amendment

speech that is likely to create a breach of the
peace

112
Q

Prior Restraint

A

gov must wait until speech occurs before acting

EXTREME cases (military code release)

113
Q

Time/ Place/ Manner Restrictions

A

reasonable restrictions permissible

  • must not be thinly-veiled content restrictions AND
  • must be no greater than necessary to achieve the government’s stated purpose

+
- license/ permit OK if no unfettered discretion
- cant restrict simply for annoyance

114
Q

Limited Public Forum / Nonpublic Forum

A

gov may regulate speech in such a forum to reserve the forum for its intended use IF:
a) Viewpoint-neutral AND
b) Reasonably related to a legitimate government purpose

115
Q

Symbolic Speech

A

CONDUCT, by itself, usually is not protected by the 1st Amendment

protected IF:
a) It is combined with protected speech OR
b) It constitutes “symbolic speech” by itself

can regulate to protect important gov interest - degree depends on the importance of gov interest in regulating non-speech interest (armbands ok/ burning draft cards not)

no prohibition of political expression but can prosecute cross burnings if done to intimidate another

116
Q

Overbreadth

A

statute is unconstitutionally overbroad if it restricts protected speech as well as unprotected speech

to successfully attack = regulation must reach expression within the protection of the 1st Amendment

117
Q

Vagueness

A

statute is unconstitutionally vague if it restricts 1st Amendment expression but fails to provide an ascertainable standard of acceptable conduct

  • related to due process: if a person cannot tell what speech is subject to regulation, then the person is likely to avoid engaging in protected speech as well (CHILLS CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED SPEECH)
118
Q

Freedom of Association

A

“the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”

119
Q

Freedom of the Press

A

no more protection than otherwise granted by 1st amendment (but matter of debate)

120
Q

Free Exercise Carveouts

A
  • employment discrimination laws to a decision by a religious group to fire one of its ministers or teachers
  • unemployment compensation programs that deny benefits to a person who lost a job or refused to accept an available job for reasons based on a sincerely-held religious belief
121
Q

NOT Violative of Establishment Clause

A

(1) employment of a chaplain by a legislature to open its session with prayer

(2) town boards can begin meetings with a non- discriminatory prayer by clergy where there is no coerced participation

(3) long-standing monuments with historical significance can remain in place

122
Q

Violates the Establishment Clause

A
  • prayer and Bible reading in public schools are invalid as an impermissible establishment of religion (even if called moment of silence/ voluntary)
  • state tax exemption that is available only to religious organizations or religious activities
123
Q

Free Exercise/ Government Benefit Programs

A

A state may not limit eligibility for a generally available government benefit to nonreligious organizations.

Even if not required to create the benefit, cannot exclude otherwise qualified individual/institution based solely on the basis of their religion status. (NO COMPELLING INTEREST)

Louisiana Bar Exam July 2023- Created By Maryclaire Farrington (19 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions