3.3 The reasons for the end of the craze Flashcards

(29 cards)

1
Q

Scepticism before 1630

1627 complaints about innocent people being executed

and then Dornheim’s proclamation

A
  • July 1627: Von Dornheim issued a proclamation stating those who give false testimony at witch trials should be beaten
  • authoriates renewed this proclamation in 1628, evidencing they must have been aware not all accusations were genuine.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Scepticism before 1630

Why did Dornheim issue the proclamation?

Forner

A
  • because there had been a series of accusations made against Forner
  • Dornheim was shocked the men who served in Bamberg in hunting witches should be accused themselves, and issued the proclamation as a warning against further slander.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ferdinan’s involvement: the case of Dorothea Flock

who was Georg Heinrich Flock? What about his wife

dorothea and Georg’s appeal

A
  • Georg Heinrich Flock was a bamberg councillor who fled to Nuremberg after being accused
  • His wife, Dorothea, was arrested
  • Georg appealed to Ferdiannd, stating her concern for her health with a newborn, and the legitimacy of the legal process.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ferdinan’s involvement: the case of Dorothea Flock

Dornheim’s (1st) letter to the emperor: what did he say about the Flocks? what was his justification?

A
  • there were no concerns over the health of either
  • the trials were simply following standards set in other parts of Germany
  • he accused Flock of being dishonest, he compelled the emperor to ignore these complaints
  • he also added he only initiated the trial to honour God and turn people away from ungodly behaviour.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ferdinan’s involvement: the case of Dorothea Flock

Renewed proceedings, Ferdinand and the Pope’s reaction?

A
  • April 1630 proceedings against her were renewed
  • her relatives appealed to the pope and to the emperor again, who both requested Dornheim stop the trial, writing if he didn’t stop, he would be punished.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ferdinan’s involvement: the case of Dorothea Flock

Dorothea’s execution

A
  • when hearing the letters on the way to Ferdinand from the Pope, Dornheim rushed the trial
  • She was executed before they could arrive on 17 May
  • she was beheaded, in secret.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ferdinan’s involvement: the case of Dorothea Flock

Her relatives protests… bitter letter to Ferdinand: on what grounds did they question the proceedings?

testimony, credibility, evidence.

A
  • Flock could not question the testimony of her accusers or hire a lawyer, because it was a secret trial
  • Carolina Law Code of 1532 required judges to establish the credibility of the witness. Flock couldn’t.
  • Carolina Law code also stated confessions through torture should only be permissible if they were supported by other evidence, this hadn’t happened.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the involvement of the imperial chamber court.

What was the imperial chamber court.

A
  • highest judicial court in the holy roman empire with judges appointed directly by the emperor. The emperor can become involved directly in cases.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

the involvement of the imperial chamber court

complaints from 2 other escapees about Von Dornheim

Emperor

A
  • complaints started reaching the imperial chamber court, where Von Dornheim’s representative reported back that 2 other escapees from the witch prison had sent complaints to the emperor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

the involvement of the imperial chamber court

What was the Diet of Regensburg

A
  • meeting of senior leaders of the Holy Roman Empire, held between July-November 1630
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

the involvement of the imperial chamber court

Who did Von Dornheim send to the Diet of Regensburg, why?

A
  • Dr Harsee and Dr Schwartzkonz were sent to the Diet of Regensburg to present a defence of the witch trials
  • high profile members felt Ferdinand’s position would be jeopardised if he tolerated the persecutions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

the involvement of the imperial chamber court

15 August 1630: Ferdinand’s letter to Dornheim

A
  • in an even more forceful tone than his previous letters, he criticised him for counting the trials in defiance of his earlier instructions
  • he complained about the case of Barbara Schwarz, who fled Vienna after escaping from the witch prison in Bamberg, and had petitioned to the emperor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

the involvement of the imperial chamber court

What did Ferdinand demand from Dornheim? How did he respond?

A
  • trial documents about Barbara Schwarz were demanded
  • Dornheim sent copies, refusing to send originals, and instead sending transcripts he claimed were copied verbatim
  • attatched to this was a letter from the witch-commissioners of Bamberg, stating no one had been arrested for witchcraft since June 1630
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

the involvement of the imperial chamber court

Despite the claim that witch-hunting had stopped, had it? What did Ferdinand discover? What was happening to the town?

A
  • Ferdinand discoverd in March 1631 that at least 25 people had been arrested in the meantime
  • relatives of the victims of Zeil informed him the commissioners continued to grow in riches from property confiscations, and the cost of the trials was making the town go bankrupt.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Georg Wilhelm Dümler’s letter and the end of the trials

who was Georg Wilhelm Dümler?

A
  • former administrator of St Martin’s Church in Bamberg
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Georg Wilhelm Dümler’s letter and the end of the trials

What was covered in his letter?

respectable people, proof, pregnant wife, carolina law code, trials.

A
  • Several hundred respectable people had suffer because of torture. The witch commission was led by false accusations.
  • There was never enough proof to find suspects guilty
  • August 1628, his pregnang wife had been taken from their house to the witch prison, where she was tortured and miscarried, she was executed, and now he was being accused. Both were entirely innocent
  • Carolina Law Code permitted a lwyer, but this was denied
  • cases of witchcraft in Bamberg were being held behind closed doors.
17
Q

Georg Wilhelm Dümler’s letter and the end of the trials

12 June 1631: what did Ferdinand announce?

punsishment, head of the witch commission, carolina law code, property.

A
  • those responsible for the trials would be punished
  • he appointed a new head of the witch commission, Dr Anton Winter
  • he decreed all future trials be conducted according to the carolina law code.
  • confiscation of property was forbidden.
18
Q

Georg Wilhelm Dümler’s letter and the end of the trials

What was Dornheim’s reaction?

support, letter, custody.

A
  • he gave little support to Winter
  • he sent one last letter to the emperor, reiterating his view that those who accused him of malpractice were involved in witchcraft
  • he refused to release those in custody
19
Q

the arrival of the swedish army: swedish involvement in the war

what was the swedish involvement in the thirty years war?

A
  • protestant swedish army entered the war in 1630
  • much of the territory lost by the protestants was regained 1630-1634 as a result
  • the army grew from around 40,000 in 1630 to 150,000 in 1632
20
Q

the arrival of the swedish army in bamberg

persecutions continuing?

A
  • despite the emperor’s direct involvement, as long as Von Dornheim remained a prince bishop, persecutions would continue
  • when the army arrived Dornheim had to flee.
21
Q

the arrival of the swedish armyb in bamberg

what did the thirty years war do to Bamberg’s population

A
  • declined by 40% during the war :(
22
Q

the arrival of the swedish army in bamberg

what happened to Dornheim when the swedish army arrived?

A
  • they arrived in February 1632
  • he looted the cathedral’s treasure, including 12 chests of Gold, and fled to Austria, where he died of a stroke in 1633
23
Q

the arrival of the swedish army in bamberg

why did the arrival of the army lead to an end to the trials?

A
  • Bamberg was preoccupied with a declining population, decimated farms and constnat fighting
  • the prince bishop fleeing meant witch hunting wasn’t seen as a priority anymore
  • any trials that took place had to follow the Carolina Law Code, and there was no longer a use for the witch prison and its torture chambers.
24
Q

conclusion: why were the Bamberg trials so extensive?

Main personalities: who influenced the extent of the witch hunt?

F, VA, VD

A
  • Forner was the most significant instigator
  • without the consent of Von Ashhausen though, the initial trials until 1619 would not have taken place
  • Dornheim acted with passion also to ensure the trials became extensive and horrific.
25
# conclusion: why were the Bamberg trials so extensive? **Other personalities**: who else made sure the witch craze was so extensive?
- members of the commission - Dornheim's legal adviser Dr Ernst Vasolt, along with the torture masters
26
# conclusion: why were the Bamberg trials so extensive? **Judicial environment**: why was this significant?
- the environment meant it could continue unchecked - judges were obliged to follow the lead of the witch hunters, who were held in high regard.
27
# conclusion: why were the Bamberg trials so extensive? **High profile individuals**: why was the involvement of high profile individuals essential to the extensive nature of the trials? | religion+
- property confiscations - this added much to the treasury - they were also targetted because a generation earlier, lots of officials in Bamberg were protestant - the witch hunts resulted in lots of accusations by eachothers collegues.
28
# conclusion: why were the Bamberg trials so extensive? **Edict of Restitution of 1629**: what was it? what was it's significance?
- Ferdinand II called for the conversion of Protestants to Catholicism - coincides with the most intense phase of witch hunting - justification?
29
# conclusion: why were the Bamberg trials so extensive? **Centralised power**
- old structures that kept the bishop in check (local council and cathedral chapter) were centralsied. More power was given to the prince bishops. - when Von Aschhausen became bishop, there was virtually no organised opposition in bamberg.