Equity #36 - Market Based Valuation Flashcards

1
Q

what to know

A

LOS 36.a

  • rationale
  • drawbacks
  • calculation
  • fundamental influence
  • calculate justified ratio
  • use it with a stock
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

trailing P/R probelms

A

LOS 36.c,d

  • transitory, nonrecurring components of earnings that are company-specific
  • cyclicality components of earnings due to business or industry trends
  • differences in account practices
  • potential dilution of EPS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

underlying earnings

A

LOS 36.e

Analysts want to remove nonrecurring items from earnings for forecasting purposes. Result is persistent, continuing, and core earnings.

Nonrecurring items to remove include:

  • gain/loss on asset sales
  • asset write-downs - impairment
  • loss provisions (restructuring, etc)
  • changes in accounting estimates

Two methods:

  • historical EPS
  • avg ROE (preferred)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

“justified price multiple”

A

LOS 36.b

Can be justified by two methods:

  • comparables
  • forecasted fundamentals

Example using P/E:

  • P/E > V0/E ⇒ stock P is undervalued
  • P/E < V0/E ⇒ stock P is overvalued
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

using P/E in valuation

A

LOS 36.c

Rationales:

  • EPS (earnings power) is primary determinant of investor value
  • popularity
  • empirically explains long-run avg stock returns

Problems:

  • “E” can be negative
  • “E” is volatile, so difficult to interpret
  • management disrection distorts reports “E”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

using P/B in valuation

A

LOS 36.c

Rationales:

  • “B” usually positive
  • “B” more stable than EPS
  • “B” good NAV measure for firms with large liquid assets e.g. banks, insurance, etc.
  • useful for valuing firms going out of business
  • empirically explains long-run avg stock returns

Problems (that cause BV != MV):

  • doesn’t recognize value of nonphysical assets
  • misleading for large firm size differences
  • different accounting methods add to errors
  • inlation and technology changes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

using P/S in valuation

A

LOS 36.c

Rationales:

  • P/S meaningful even for distressed firms
  • sales rev difficult to manipulate vs. EPS
  • not as volatile as P/E
  • appropriate for mature, cyclical industries and for start-ups with no historical earnings
  • empirically explains long-run avg stock returns

Problems:

  • higher sales doesn’t mean higher operating profits
  • doesn’t capture cost structure differences
  • revenue manipulation/acceleration can distort it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

using P/CF in valuation

A

LOS 36.c

Rationales:

  • CF harder to manipulate than earnings
  • more stable than P/E
  • solves accrual accounting differences
  • empirically explains long-run avg stock returns

Problems:

  • EPS + NNC ignores some items affecting CFO
  • FCFE preferred but more volatile than CFO
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

using dividend yield (D/P) in valuation

A

LOS 36.c

Rationales:

  • Div contributes to total investment return
  • Div not as risky as cap apprec component of TR

Problems:

  • Div only one component of stock return
  • higher Div = slower growth, all else equal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

multiple influencers

A

LOS 36.g

All else equal:

  • P/E ⇔ +g, -re
  • P/S ⇔ +profit margin, -re
  • P/CF ⇔ +g of FCFE, -re
  • D/P ⇔ -g, +re
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

calculate P/E, P/B and P/S based on forecasted fundamentals and DCF valuation

A

LOS 36.h

lead P/E = P0/E1 = (1-b) / (r-g); (1-b) is “payout ratio”

P0/B0 = (ROE - g) / (r-g)

P0/S0 = (E0/S0) x (1 - b)(1 + g) / (r-g)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

PEG ratio

A

LOS 36.k

PEG = P/E x 1/g

  • lower PEG are more attractive, all else equal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

using price multiples to estimate terminal value, VT

A

LOS 36.l

for P/E, P/B, P/S, P/CF price multiples:

VT = price multiple x terminal vaue of fundamental variable i.e. denominator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

four common measures of CF for CF multiples and EV multiples

A

LOS 36.m

  1. E + NCC = NI + D + amort + depletion
    E + NCC = EPS + D/Sh + amort/Sh + depl/Sh
  2. adjusted CFO = CFO + (noncash int outflow)(1 - T)
    better value est. than E + NCC
  3. FCFE = CFO - CapEx - principal pmt to debtholders
    even better value est. but FCFE more volatile
  4. EBITDA = EBIT + D + amort (for forecasting)
    EBITDA = recur. earn cont. ops + Int + T + D + amort (for historical values)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

EV/EBITDA

A

LOS 36.n

EV = MVequity + MVdebt + MVpref - cash & equiv

EBITDA is a pre-interest ernaings measure and therefore measure of cash flow to the firm, both debt and equity holders.

EV/EBITDA commonly used to measure relative company value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

using EV/EBITDA in valuation

A

LOS 36.n

EV/EBITDA commonly used to measure relative company value

Rationales:

  • useful to compare firms with different degrees of financial leverage
  • EBITDA useful for valuing capital-intensive businesses with high depreciation
  • EBITDA usually positive

Problems:

  • if working capital (WC) is growing, EBITDA will overstate CFO
  • FCFF more strongly linked to value than EBITDA
17
Q

momentum indicators

A

LOS 36.p

momentum indicators relate price (or EPS, etc.) to:

  • historical values of itself or benchmark
  • estimated values of itself or benchmark
18
Q

earnings surprise / unexpected earnings

A

LOS 36.p

earnings surprise = reported EPS - expected EPS

standardized unexpected earnings (SUE):

SUE = (EPS surprise) / σEPS surpise to analyst est.

19
Q

relative strength

A

LOS 36.p

relative strength - compares a stock’s price or return over given time period with its own historical performance or to group of peer stocks

Rationale: patterns of persistence or reversal may exist in stock returns

20
Q

weighted harmonic mean

A

LOS 36.p

portfolio or index price multiple is calculated this way

wtd harm mean P/E = 1 (w1/PE1 + w2/PE2 + … + wn/PEn)